Enzyme-substrate binding happens at a molecular scale that cannot be observed directly with school equipment. To meet the syllabus requirement to model the action of enzymes in cells, this investigation uses simple physical models to compare the lock-and-key and induced fit mechanisms described earlier in this lesson.
Aim
To construct physical models of the lock-and-key and induced fit mechanisms of enzyme action, and to evaluate which model better represents real enzyme behaviour.
Materials
- Card or foam board, cut into one fixed "active site" shape and several matching and non-matching "substrate" shapes
- Modelling clay or plasticine, moulded into a second "active site"
- A range of small objects of different shapes and sizes to act as substrates (e.g. blocks, marbles, irregular pieces)
- Ruler and stopwatch
Method
- Lock-and-key model: Cut a rigid card "active site" with one exact complementary shape. Time how long it takes to correctly fit the matching substrate, then attempt to fit two non-matching substrates into the same rigid shape.
- Induced fit model: Mould a piece of clay into an approximate active site shape. Press the same matching substrate into the clay and observe how the clay reshapes around it to form a snug fit. Repeat with the non-matching substrates, noting whether the clay can also accommodate a reasonable range of shapes.
- For each model, record whether the correct substrate bound successfully, whether either incorrect substrate could also bind, and how long fitting took.
- Remove each substrate and check whether the active site, card or clay, returns to a shape that can accept the correct substrate again, modelling enzyme reusability.
- Compare both models against the interactive enzyme-substrate diagram earlier in this lesson and the X-ray crystallography evidence described for the induced fit model.
What the models represent, and their limits
The rigid card model represents the original lock-and-key hypothesis: a fixed shape that only one substrate fits. The reshaping clay model represents induced fit: a flexible active site that changes conformation around the substrate. Neither model is a perfect representation, cards and clay do not show the actual chemical bonds (hydrogen bonds, ionic interactions) that hold a real substrate in an active site, and unlike a real enzyme, the clay model does not spontaneously return to its exact original shape after the substrate is removed.
Discussion Questions
- Which model, the rigid card or the reshaping clay, more accurately represents real enzyme behaviour? Justify your answer using the X-ray crystallography evidence described earlier in this lesson.
- Explain one limitation of using a physical model to represent a molecular-level process such as enzyme-substrate binding.
- Despite being an oversimplification, explain why the lock-and-key model is still a useful starting point for explaining enzyme specificity.
- Suggest one modification to the clay model that would better represent the reversible nature of enzyme-substrate binding (E + S ⇌ ES).