Cane toads were introduced in 1935 to control cane beetles, but the beetles were largely unaffected while the toads spread across northern Australia and harmed native predators. This lesson uses that case study to examine how biodiversity is threatened by invasive species, habitat fragmentation, overexploitation, pollution, climate change and the loss of genetic diversity itself.
Use the PDF for classwork, homework or revision. It includes key ideas, activities, questions, an extend task and success-criteria proof.
Lock in your first explanation before the categories are formalised.
1. Why can an introduced species damage biodiversity even if humans originally brought it in for a useful purpose?
2. If a population becomes very small but does not go extinct immediately, why can it still be at growing long-term risk?
Write your starting answer now. We will revisit it after the cane-toad and genetic-erosion sections.
Write your initial answer in your book, then return later to compare it with your final explanation.
Wrong: Bacteria and viruses are the same thing.
Right: Bacteria are living cells; viruses are non-living particles that require host cells to reproduce.
Core Content
Connect this concept to the broader biology framework. Understanding how systems interact is essential for HSC success.
Why a biological “solution” can become a biodiversity disaster
Major threats to biodiversity
Introduced species can alter ecosystems through predation, competition, disease transmission, hybridisation and indirect changes to ecological relationships.
Cane toads were introduced to Australia in 1935 to control cane beetles, but the plan failed because the beetles were not effectively controlled while the toads spread through tropical Queensland and the Northern Territory. Cane toads are toxic, and many native predators such as quolls, goannas and freshwater crocodiles are vulnerable when they attempt to eat them. The result is not just the survival of the toad population itself, but disruption across food webs and population declines in native species.
Different pathways, same result: lower resilience and higher extinction risk
Biodiversity declines for many reasons, but the major threats can be organised into a small set of recurring categories.
| Threat | What It Does | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Habitat loss and fragmentation | Reduces available space, isolates populations and lowers gene flow | Land clearing for agriculture, mining, urban expansion |
| Introduced / invasive species | Adds new predators, competitors, diseases or hybridisation pressures | Cane toads, cats, rabbits, foxes, chytrid fungus, myrtle rust |
| Overexploitation | Removes organisms faster than reproduction can replace them | Overfishing, illegal wildlife trade, shark-fin demand |
| Pollution | Changes chemical conditions and harms organisms directly or indirectly | Eutrophication, pesticides, heavy metals, plastics |
| Climate change | Shifts habitats, temperatures and ecological conditions faster than some species can track | Bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef, range shifts, increased fire frequency |
Fragmentation is especially important because it links directly to the evolutionary ideas from earlier lessons. When habitat patches become isolated, populations become smaller and more cut off from one another. That reduces gene flow, increases the importance of drift, and raises the risk that local populations cannot recover from disturbance.
Why a small population can still be in danger even if it is not extinct yet
As population size decreases, genetic diversity usually decreases as well. This process is called genetic erosion.
Small populations are more likely to lose rare alleles by chance and more likely to breed with close relatives. That can produce inbreeding depression and lower the population's ability to adapt to future environmental change. A population might appear to persist for a time, but its evolutionary resilience is shrinking.
The Tasmanian devil case study helps show why this matters. Low genetic diversity is one reason devil facial tumour disease has been such a serious threat, because genetically similar populations may be less able to resist or contain emerging disease pressures.
Activities
Explain why the cane toad introduction should be assessed as ecologically harmful rather than neutral. Include at least two different ecological effects in your answer.
A strong answer should go beyond “it spread a lot” and explain what changed in the ecosystem.
Draft your assessment in your book first, then record the final answer here.
A conservation student argues that once a species stops declining in number, the biodiversity threat has basically ended. Explain why genetic erosion shows that this conclusion can be too optimistic.
A strong answer should mention rare alleles, inbreeding and reduced adaptive capacity.
Write the longer explanation in your book, then summarise it here.
The strongest way to think about biodiversity threats is as pressures on both present ecosystems and future evolutionary potential. A species can be alive now while still becoming more vulnerable every generation.
If your first answer treated biodiversity loss as just “fewer animals”, the upgrade is to include ecosystem interactions, gene flow, and genetic diversity.
Assessment
Answer first, then read the explanation
1. Which is the best description of habitat fragmentation?
2. Why are cane toads considered a major biodiversity threat in Australia?
3. Which threat category best matches nutrient runoff causing algal blooms and oxygen depletion?
4. What is genetic erosion?
What is NOT genetic erosion?
5. Why does genetic erosion increase long-term biodiversity risk?
1. Explain how an introduced species can affect both biotic and abiotic factors in an ecosystem. (4 marks)
1 mark: biotic effect | 1 mark: abiotic effect or broader ecosystem condition | 1 mark: introduced-species context | 1 mark: clear explanation
2. Distinguish between habitat fragmentation and genetic erosion. (3 marks)
1 mark: fragmentation defined | 1 mark: genetic erosion defined | 1 mark: clear relationship/distinction
3. Assess why low genetic diversity can make a species more vulnerable to disease. (3 marks)
1 mark: low variation idea | 1 mark: disease vulnerability | 1 mark: adaptive/inbreeding implication
Answers
SA1: An introduced species can affect biotic factors by preying on native species, competing with them for resources, spreading disease, or disrupting food-web structure. It can also affect abiotic conditions indirectly by changing vegetation cover, soil chemistry or fire regimes through its ecological effects. The key point is that the introduced species alters both living relationships and the broader environmental conditions that shape the ecosystem.
SA2: Habitat fragmentation is the splitting of a continuous habitat into smaller isolated patches, often reducing movement and gene flow between populations. Genetic erosion is the loss of genetic diversity as a population becomes small and loses alleles over time. Fragmentation can lead to genetic erosion because isolated populations become smaller and more cut off from one another.
SA3: Low genetic diversity makes a species more vulnerable to disease because individuals are genetically similar, so fewer may carry resistant variants. That means a pathogen can spread more effectively through the population. Low diversity is also linked to inbreeding and lower adaptive potential, making it harder for the species to respond to future disease pressures.
Say each answer aloud before moving to the next prompt