Module 1 · L18 of 2130 min⚡ +50 XP in Learn · +25 to completeYear 11 · Module 1 · IQ3
Periodic Trends: Electronegativity and Reactivity
Today's hook, Fluorine will tear an electron away from almost anything, including water and glass. Its next-door neighbour neon will not react with anything at all.
0/5QUESTS
1
You're here
Warm up and recall
Warm up first
Three quick questions from earlier lessons. Pulling old material back to mind before you learn something new makes the new material stick better, so this is not busywork.
Worksheets
Practise this lesson
Four printable worksheets that build from the foundations up to exam-style questions, start at whatever level suits you.
Fluorine is the most electronegative element and reacts violently with almost everything. Cesium is one of the least electronegative elements and also reacts violently with water. Yet their reactivity comes from opposite tendencies, fluorine wants to gain electrons, while cesium wants to lose them. How can two elements at opposite ends of the periodic table both be considered "highly reactive"?
auto-saved
What you'll master, and the words for it
03
What you'll master
Know
Key facts
Electronegativity increases across a period and decreases down a group; F is the highest at 4.0
Metal reactivity increases down a group; non-metal reactivity decreases down a group
Understand
Concepts
Why the electronegativity trend follows the same logic as ionisation energy, both depend on the pull on outer electrons
Why metals and non-metals show opposite down-group trends (they lose vs gain electrons)
Why the 1.7 threshold is a guide, not a sharp boundary, bonding is a continuum
Can do
Skills
Calculate |Δχ| for any bond and classify it as non-polar covalent, polar covalent, or ionic
Assign δ+ and δ− to the correct atoms in a polar covalent bond
Predict which of two elements is more reactive and justify with shell distance, shielding and effective nuclear charge
2
Electronegativity: Trends and Explanation
05
Electronegativity: Trends and Explanation
core concept
Across period (L→R)
Trend:Electronegativity increases
Explanation:Z_eff increases (same shielding, more protons) → stronger nuclear pull on bonding electrons → greater tendency to attract shared electrons toward the atom
Values:Period 2: Li(1.0) → F(4.0). Period 3: Na(0.9) → Cl(3.2)
Down a group
Trend:Electronegativity decreases
Explanation:Atomic radius increases (new shells) → bonding electrons further from nucleus → more shielded → weaker ability to attract bonding electrons
Highest electronegativity: F (4.0), top-right corner (excluding noble gases). Lowest: Fr/Cs (≈0.7), bottom-left corner. Noble gases are usually left without a Pauling electronegativity value: the Pauling scale is calculated from bond energies, and noble gases form bonds so rarely that the data needed are not available. That is a data limitation, not proof that they cannot bond, a few noble-gas compounds (such as XeF₂) are known.
Selected Pauling electronegativity values
H: 2.2
Li: 1.0
Be: 1.6
B: 2.0
C: 2.6
N: 3.0
O: 3.4
F: 4.0
Na: 0.9
Mg: 1.3
Al: 1.6
Si: 1.9
P: 2.2
S: 2.6
Cl: 3.2
Electronegativity = the ability of an atom to attract bonding electrons in a covalent bond (Pauling scale, 0.7–4.0). Increases across a period (more protons, same shielding → stronger pull); decreases down a group (more shells, more shielding). Key values: F = 4.0, O = 3.4, Cl = 3.2, N = 3.0, C = 2.6, H = 2.2, Na = 0.9.
Pause, copy the highlighted electronegativity trends and key values into your book before moving on.
Match each element to its Pauling electronegativity. Use the trend (highest at top-right) to decide.
F (fluorine)
Cl (chlorine)
C (carbon)
Na (sodium)
2.6
4.0, the highest electronegativity of any element
0.9
3.2
3
Using Electronegativity Difference to Classify Bonds
06
Using Electronegativity Difference to Classify Bonds
core concept
The difference in electronegativity between two bonded atoms (|Δχ|) determines whether the bond is non-polar covalent, polar covalent, or ionic. These are approximate thresholds, bond character is actually a continuum from fully covalent to fully ionic.
|Δχ| range
Bond type
Electron distribution
Example
< 0.4
Non-polar covalent
Equally (or nearly equally) shared
H₂ (Δχ=0), Cl₂ (Δχ=0), CH₄ (Δχ=0.4)
0.4–1.7
Polar covalent
Unequally shared; δ+ on less electronegative, δ− on more electronegative
Electron effectively transferred; full charges form (M⁺ and X⁻)
NaCl (Δχ=2.3), MgO (Δχ=2.1), KF (Δχ=3.3)
Important caveat: The 1.7 threshold is a guide, not a sharp boundary. Many compounds near 1.7 have significant character of both ionic and covalent bonding. The classification is useful but simplistic.
A polar bond is not the same as a polar molecule. |Δχ| classifies one bond. Whether the whole molecule is polar also depends on its shape: in a symmetric molecule the individual bond dipoles can point in opposite directions and cancel, leaving no net dipole. CO₂ (O=C=O, linear) and CCl₄ (tetrahedral) both have polar bonds yet are non-polar molecules. Always check the geometry before calling a molecule polar.
Metals (left side)
Across a period (L→R):Metallic reactivity decreases L→R (metals become less reactive; left side metals more reactive)
Down a group:Metallic reactivity increases going down
Explanation:Metals react by LOSING electrons. Down a group: atomic radius ↑, IE ↓ → easier to lose electrons → more reactive. Across period: IE increases → harder to lose electrons → less reactive.
Non-metals (right side)
Across a period (L→R):Non-metallic reactivity increases L→R (right side non-metals more reactive)
Down a group:Non-metallic reactivity decreases going down
Explanation:Non-metals react by GAINING electrons. Down a group: atomic radius ↑ → harder to attract new electrons → less reactive. Across period: electronegativity ↑ → greater tendency to attract electrons → more reactive.
Key contrast, metals vs non-metals: For metals going down a group, reactivity INCREASES (easier to lose electrons). For non-metals going down a group, reactivity DECREASES (harder to gain electrons). These are opposite trends. Always specify which type of element you're discussing. These trends are reliable for the Group 1 metals and Group 17 non-metals studied here; what you actually observe also depends on conditions. Reaction rate (kinetics), temperature and surface area all matter, and some reactive metals appear unreactive because a thin oxide layer passivates the surface (aluminium is the classic example) even though the metal underneath is reactive.
Displacement Reactions as Evidence for Reactivity
A more reactive metal will displace a less reactive metal from its salt solution. A more reactive halogen will displace a less reactive halide from its solution. These reactions are direct evidence of relative reactivity (covered in more depth in Module 2).
Activity series (metals, most → least reactive): K > Na > Ca > Mg > Al > Zn > Fe > Pb > (H) > Cu > Ag > Au Halogen reactivity (most → least): F₂ > Cl₂ > Br₂ > I₂
Worked Example 1, Method A: Predict bond type from electronegativity difference
Worked Examples
1
Worked Example 1, Method A: Predict bond type from electronegativity difference
Classify the bonds in the following as non-polar covalent, polar covalent, or ionic. Use electronegativity values from the table above: (a) Na–Cl, (b) N–H in NH₃, (c) C–H in CH₄, (d) O–F in OF₂.
Method A, Direct Δχ calculation
(a) Na–Cl
χ(Na) = 0.9, χ(Cl) = 3.2 → |Δχ| = 3.2 − 0.9 = 2.3 ≥ 1.7 → Ionic Na effectively transfers its 3s¹ electron to Cl → Na⁺ and Cl⁻ form ionic bond.
(b) N–H in NH₃
χ(N) = 3.0, χ(H) = 2.2 → |Δχ| = 3.0 − 2.2 = 0.8 (0.4–1.7) → Polar covalent N is more electronegative → δ− on N, δ+ on H. This is why NH₃ is a hydrogen bond acceptor and has significant dipole moment.
(c) C–H in CH₄
χ(C) = 2.6, χ(H) = 2.2 → |Δχ| = 2.6 − 2.2 = 0.4 → borderline non-polar covalent Some sources classify this as just inside non-polar; others as very weakly polar. Methane is generally treated as non-polar overall.
(d) O–F in OF₂
χ(O) = 3.4, χ(F) = 4.0 → |Δχ| = 4.0 − 3.4 = 0.6 (0.4–1.7) → Polar covalent F is more electronegative → δ− on F, δ+ on O. Unusual case: O is δ+ here, not δ−.
Answer
(a) Ionic (|Δχ|=2.3). (b) Polar covalent N–H (|Δχ|=0.8). (c) Non-polar covalent C–H (|Δχ|=0.4, borderline). (d) Polar covalent O–F (|Δχ|=0.6), with δ− on F and unusual δ+ on O.
2
Worked Example 2, Method B: Compare reactivity from periodic position
Method B: Without electronegativity values, use only periodic table position to predict: (a) Which is more reactive as a metal, Na (Z=11) or K (Z=19)? (b) Which is more reactive as a non-metal, Cl (Z=17) or Br (Z=35)? Justify each with reference to atomic structure.
Method B, Position-based reasoning
(a) Na vs K, Group 1 metals
Na is Period 3; K is Period 4 → K is further down Group 1 Going down Group 1: atomic radius increases (more shells) → valence electron further from nucleus and more shielded → weaker nuclear pull on valence electron → lower IE → easier to lose the valence electron → MORE reactive metal. K (Period 4) > Na (Period 3) in metallic reactivity.
(b) Cl vs Br, Group 17 halogens
Cl is Period 3; Br is Period 4 → Br is further down Group 17 Going down Group 17: atomic radius increases (more shells) → valence shell further from nucleus → more shielded → weaker nuclear attraction for an incoming electron → HARDER to gain that electron → LESS reactive non-metal. Cl (Period 3) > Br (Period 4) in non-metallic reactivity.
Key contrast
Metals MORE reactive going down; non-metals LESS reactive going down. Same underlying reason (larger atom, more shielding) but opposite outcomes because metals LOSE electrons and non-metals GAIN electrons.
Answer
(a) K is more reactive than Na, both Group 1 metals, but K has a larger atomic radius (Period 4 vs Period 3) → valence electron more loosely held → easier to lose → more reactive. (b) Cl is more reactive than Br, both Group 17 halogens, but Br has a larger atomic radius → valence shell further from nucleus → weaker attraction for an incoming electron → harder to gain an electron → less reactive.
Common Mistakes
⚠️
Common Mistakes
⚠
Applying the same reactivity trend to both metals and non-metals. For metals, reactivity increases down a group. For non-metals, reactivity decreases down a group. These are opposite because metals lose electrons while non-metals gain them. Always specify which type of element before predicting the trend.
⚠
Confusing electronegativity with electron affinity. Electronegativity measures the pull on bonding electrons in a bond. Electron affinity measures the energy change when an isolated atom gains an electron. They're related but not the same. HSC questions about periodic trends typically use electronegativity.
⚠
Using |Δχ| thresholds as exact boundaries. The 0.4 and 1.7 thresholds are approximate guides. A bond with |Δχ| = 1.6 is mostly covalent with some ionic character; one with |Δχ| = 1.8 is mostly ionic with significant covalent character. Don't treat the boundaries as sharp, acknowledge they're approximate in exam answers.
Copy Into Your Books
▼
Electronegativity
Across period: INCREASES (↑Z_eff)
Down group: DECREASES (↑atomic radius)
Highest: F (4.0), top right
Lowest: Cs/Fr (~0.7), bottom left
Bond Classification
|Δχ| < 0.4: non-polar covalent
|Δχ| 0.4–1.7: polar covalent
|Δχ| ≥ 1.7: ionic
δ− on more electronegative atom
Reactivity
Metals: react by LOSING electrons
Metal reactivity ↑ down group (easier to lose e⁻)
Non-metals: react by GAINING electrons
Non-metal reactivity ↓ down group (harder to gain e⁻)
️ Exam Traps
Metals and non-metals have OPPOSITE down-group reactivity trends
Thresholds are approximate (say ~1.7 not exactly 1.7)
F = most electronegative (4.0); Cl = 3.2 (check Pauling table)
Noble gases not given χ values
4
Activities
Activities
📊 Activity 1, Data Analysis: Electronegativity
1 Using the Pauling electronegativity values given in the lesson, classify each bond as non-polar covalent, polar covalent, or ionic. State the direction of polarity (δ+/δ−) where relevant: (a) H–F, (b) Mg–O, (c) P–Cl, (d) S–O.
✏️ Answer in your book
2 Arrange the following in order of decreasing electronegativity: F, Na, O, Al, Cl. Justify by reference to period and group position.
✏️ Answer in your book
🔥 Activity 2, Reactivity Comparison
A Predict which element in each pair is more reactive, and give the mechanistic reason: (a) Li vs Cs (both Group 1), (b) F₂ vs I₂ (both Group 17), (c) Mg vs Ba (both Group 2).
✏️ Answer in your book
B Bromine water (Br₂ dissolved in water, orange-brown) is added to a solution of potassium iodide (KI, colourless). A purple colour develops, indicating I₂ has been produced. Write a word equation and explain which halogen is more reactive. Relate this to the periodic trend.
✏️ Answer in your book
Explore the model
Interactive: Electronegativity Trend Interactive
Revisit Your Initial Thinking
We just saw how electronegativity trends across periods and down groups. That raises a question: how is the difference in electronegativity between two bonded atoms used to classify the type of bond formed? This card answers it → the absolute electronegativity difference (|Δχ|) places a bond into one of three categories along the ionic–covalent continuum.
Look back at what you wrote in the Think First section. What has changed? What did you get right? What surprised you?
Bond polarity classification by |Δχ| (electronegativity difference): <0.4 → non-polar covalent; 0.4–1.7 → polar covalent; ≥1.7 → ionic. In a polar covalent bond, δ− sits on the more electronegative atom, δ+ on the less electronegative atom. The 1.7 threshold is a guideline, bonding is a continuum. Always state which atom carries δ+ and δ−.
Add the highlighted bond classification rule to your notes before the check below.
Quick check: using χ(Mg)=1.3 and χ(O)=3.4, classify the bond in MgO.
5
Using Electronegativity Difference to Classify Bonds
07
Using Electronegativity Difference to Classify Bonds
core concept
The difference in electronegativity between two bonded atoms (|Δχ|) determines whether the bond is non-polar covalent, polar covalent, or ionic. These are approximate thresholds, bond character is actually a continuum from fully covalent to fully ionic.
|Δχ| range
Bond type
Electron distribution
Example
< 0.4
Non-polar covalent
Equally (or nearly equally) shared
H₂ (Δχ=0), Cl₂ (Δχ=0), CH₄ (Δχ=0.4)
0.4–1.7
Polar covalent
Unequally shared; δ+ on less electronegative, δ− on more electronegative
Electron effectively transferred; full charges form (M⁺ and X⁻)
NaCl (Δχ=2.3), MgO (Δχ=2.1), KF (Δχ=3.3)
Important caveat: The 1.7 threshold is a guide, not a sharp boundary. Many compounds near 1.7 have significant character of both ionic and covalent bonding. The classification is useful but simplistic.
A polar bond is not the same as a polar molecule. |Δχ| classifies one bond. Whether the whole molecule is polar also depends on its shape: in a symmetric molecule the individual bond dipoles can point in opposite directions and cancel, leaving no net dipole. CO₂ (O=C=O, linear) and CCl₄ (tetrahedral) both have polar bonds yet are non-polar molecules. Always check the geometry before calling a molecule polar.
We just saw the three bond polarity categories and the 1.7 threshold. That raises a question: how do you apply this in practice for a specific bond in an exam question, including showing the δ+/δ− assignment? This card answers it → look up both χ values, calculate |Δχ|, classify, then assign δ+ to the less electronegative atom.
Bond classification method: look up χ for each atom → subtract (take positive value) → apply three thresholds. Examples: H–F (Δχ = 1.8) → strongly polar covalent (δ− on F); Na–Cl (Δχ = 2.3) → ionic; C–H (Δχ = 0.4) → borderline non-polar covalent. Acknowledge that the 1.7 threshold is approximate, bonds near it have mixed character.
Pause, write the highlighted bond classification method into your book.
Two truths and a lie: three statements about the |Δχ| thresholds. Pick the false one.
6
Reactivity Trends: Metals and Non-metals
08
Reactivity Trends: Metals and Non-metals
core concept
Metals (left side)
Across a period (L→R):Metallic reactivity decreases L→R (metals become less reactive; left side metals more reactive)
Down a group:Metallic reactivity increases going down
Explanation:Metals react by LOSING electrons. Down a group: atomic radius ↑, IE ↓ → easier to lose electrons → more reactive. Across period: IE increases → harder to lose electrons → less reactive.
Non-metals (right side)
Across a period (L→R):Non-metallic reactivity increases L→R (right side non-metals more reactive)
Down a group:Non-metallic reactivity decreases going down
Explanation:Non-metals react by GAINING electrons. Down a group: atomic radius ↑ → harder to attract new electrons → less reactive. Across period: electronegativity ↑ → greater tendency to attract electrons → more reactive.
Key contrast, metals vs non-metals: For metals going down a group, reactivity INCREASES (easier to lose electrons). For non-metals going down a group, reactivity DECREASES (harder to gain electrons). These are opposite trends. Always specify which type of element you're discussing. These trends are reliable for the Group 1 metals and Group 17 non-metals studied here; what you actually observe also depends on conditions. Reaction rate (kinetics), temperature and surface area all matter, and some reactive metals appear unreactive because a thin oxide layer passivates the surface (aluminium is the classic example) even though the metal underneath is reactive.
Displacement Reactions as Evidence for Reactivity
A more reactive metal will displace a less reactive metal from its salt solution. A more reactive halogen will displace a less reactive halide from its solution. These reactions are direct evidence of relative reactivity (covered in more depth in Module 2).
Activity series (metals, most → least reactive): K > Na > Ca > Mg > Al > Zn > Fe > Pb > (H) > Cu > Ag > Au Halogen reactivity (most → least): F₂ > Cl₂ > Br₂ > I₂
We just saw how to classify bond polarity using |Δχ|. That raises a question: how does electronegativity connect to the reactivity trends of metals and non-metals? This card answers it → metals react by losing electrons (lower electronegativity, lower IE down a group → more reactive); non-metals react by gaining electrons (higher electronegativity, weaker pull on incoming electrons down a group → less reactive).
Metal reactivity increases down a group (more shells → larger atom → lower ionisation energy → easier to lose electrons; K > Na > Li). Non-metal reactivity decreases down a group (more shells → weaker pull on incoming electrons; F > Cl > Br > I). Halogen displacement: a more reactive halogen displaces a less reactive one from its halide solution (e.g. Cl₂ + 2KBr → 2KCl + Br₂).
Add the highlighted reactivity trends to your notes before the check below.
Match each trend to the reactivity outcome.
Metals, going down a group
Metals, going across a period (L→R)
Non-metals, going down a group
Non-metals, going across a period (L→R)
Reactivity decreases, larger atoms attract incoming electrons less strongly.
Reactivity decreases, IE increases, making outer electrons harder to lose.
Reactivity increases, electronegativity increases, so atoms attract electrons more strongly.
Reactivity increases, larger radius and more shielding make outer electrons easier to lose.
Short Answer Questions
09
Short Answer Questions
core concept
6. The following observations are recorded in a halogen displacement experiment: Chlorine water added to KBr solution → orange-brown colour develops (Br₂ formed). Bromine water added to KI solution → purple colour develops (I₂ formed). Iodine solution added to KCl solution → no colour change. Arrange Cl₂, Br₂, and I₂ in order of decreasing reactivity as oxidising agents, and explain the trend using the periodic table. 4 MARKS
✏️ Answer in your book
7. Explain, using electronegativity and bond polarity, why HF is a polar molecule but F₂ is non-polar. In your answer, include a Δχ calculation for each bond and describe the charge distribution. 4 MARKS
✏️ Answer in your book
We just saw the metal and non-metal reactivity trends. That raises a question: how do you write exam answers on electronegativity and reactivity that earn full marks? This card answers it → always show Δχ working, name the correct direction of δ+/δ−, and for reactivity trends, explicitly mention IE (metals) or electron affinity (non-metals).
For exam answers on electronegativity: always quote at least one χ value and show the Δχ calculation, don't just classify by inspection. For reactivity trend answers: metals, "more shells → lower IE → easier to lose electrons"; non-metals, "more shells → weaker attraction for incoming electron → harder to gain". For halogen displacement: the more electronegative halogen wins.
Pause, copy the highlighted exam language into your book before moving on.
Quick check: Cl₂ is added to KBr solution and the solution turns orange-brown. Which conclusion is correct?
7
Worked examples
Worked examples · reveal as you go
Worked example+5 XP on full reveal
Classify the bonds in the following as non-polar covalent, polar covalent, or ionic. Use Pauling electronegativity values: (a) Na–Cl, (b) N–H in NH₃, (c) C–H in CH₄, (d) O–F in OF₂.
F is more electronegative, so δ⁻ sits on F and δ⁺ on O, unusual because O is usually the more electronegative atom.
Worked example+5 XP on full reveal
Without using electronegativity values, use periodic table position to predict: (a) Which is more reactive as a metal, Na (Period 3) or K (Period 4)? (b) Which is more reactive as a non-metal, Cl (Period 3) or Br (Period 4)? Justify each with reference to atomic structure.
1
(a) Na vs K, Group 1 metals, both want to LOSE their valence electron.
Both are Group 1, but K is further down (Period 4 vs Period 3). K has more electron shells and more shielding.
2
As we go down Group 1: atomic radius ↑, nuclear pull on valence electron ↓, ionisation energy ↓
Larger radius + more shielding = valence electron held more loosely. Lower IE means it's easier to lose that electron.
3
Therefore: K is more reactive as a metal than Na
K's valence electron is easier to remove, so K reacts more vigorously (esp. with water).
4
(b) Cl vs Br, Group 17 halogens, both want to GAIN one electron (opposite to metals!)
Both are Group 17, but Br is further down (Period 4 vs Period 3). Br has more electron shells and more shielding.
5
As we go down Group 17: atomic radius ↑, nuclear pull on INCOMING electron ↓, reactivity ↓
Larger Br atom means the nucleus is further away and more shielded. Harder to attract a new electron into the valence shell.
6
Therefore: Cl is more reactive as a non-metal than Br
Opposite trend to metals! Same reason (size + shielding) but opposite outcome because non-metals gain electrons.
Put the method in order
Predict, then reveal+8 XP
1 · Predict
2 · Reveal
3 · Compare
Using χ(H) = 2.2 and χ(F) = 4.0, predict (i) the |Δχ| of the H–F bond, (ii) the bond classification, and (iii) which atom carries the δ−.
Confidence:50%
Answer
|Δχ| = 4.0 − 2.2 = 1.8, just above the ≥1.7 guide, but HF is actually a polar covalent molecule (the 1.7 cutoff is approximate, not a law) · δ− on F
Strictly by the threshold, 1.8 is in the "ionic" band. In practice HF is treated as a strongly polar covalent molecule (highly polar bond, very large dipole), a good example of why 1.7 is a guide, not a sharp cutoff. F is more electronegative, so the bonding pair is pulled toward F: δ⁺H–Fδ⁻.
How close was your prediction?
Nice, |Δχ| then classify, then assign δ− to the more electronegative atom.
Remember: subtract smaller χ from larger, compare to the 0.4 / 1.7 thresholds, then δ− goes on the more electronegative atom.
Misconception to fix
Common errors · the 3 traps that cost marks
1
Misconception to fix
Wrong: Electronegativity and electron affinity are the same thing.
2
Misconception to fix
Right: Electronegativity is an atom's ability to attract bonding electrons in a covalent bond (a relative scale). Electron affinity is the energy change when an atom gains an electron (a measurable thermodynamic quantity). They are related but distinct concepts.
3
Putting δ− on the less electronegative atom
Some students reason "Na lost an electron so it must be δ−". In fact δ− always sits on the MORE electronegative atom, the one pulling the shared electrons toward itself. In H–Cl, Cl (χ = 3.2) is more electronegative than H (χ = 2.2), so Cl is δ− and H is δ+. Reversing this loses the polarity mark and any follow-on dipole-moment marks.
Fix: Always identify the atom with higher χ first, label it δ−, then label the other atom δ+.
8
Drill, then revisit
Quick-fire practice · 5 reps +2 XP per reveal
1
Which element has the highest Pauling electronegativity, and what is its value?
Fluorine (F), 4.0.
2
Calculate |Δχ| for H–Cl using χ(H)=2.2 and χ(Cl)=3.2, then classify the bond.
|Δχ| = 3.2 − 2.2 = 1.0. Range 0.4–1.7 → polar covalent bond. δ− on Cl, δ+ on H.
3
Predict whether K or Na is a more reactive metal, and justify in one sentence.
K is more reactive, both are Group 1, but K (Period 4) has a larger radius and more shielding than Na (Period 3), so its valence electron is lost more easily.
4
Cl₂ is bubbled into a colourless solution of NaBr and the solution turns orange-brown. Write the balanced equation and state what it shows about reactivity.
Cl₂ + 2 NaBr → 2 NaCl + Br₂. Cl₂ has displaced Br⁻, so Cl₂ is a more reactive non-metal/oxidising agent than Br₂.
5
Using χ values from the lesson, calculate |Δχ| for the Mg–O bond in MgO. Classify the bond and explain whether the 1.7 threshold gives the full picture.
|Δχ| = 3.4 − 1.3 = 2.1 ≥ 1.7 → classified as ionic (Mg²⁺ O²⁻). The 1.7 threshold is approximate; MgO still has some covalent character because bonding is a continuum, but at |Δχ| = 2.1 it is well into the ionic region.
auto-saved
auto-saved
auto-saved
auto-saved
12
Revisit your thinking
Look back at what you wrote in the Think First section. What has changed? What did you get right? What surprised you?
The Periodic Table tool shows elements are arranged in periods and groups. Elements in the SAME GROUP have…
✓
Multiple choice
01
Multiple choice
+5 XP per correct · +25 XP all-correct
Pick your answer, then rate your confidence. That tells the system what to drill next.
Spot the error+5 XP
A student is asked to compare the reactivity of magnesium (Mg, Period 3) and barium (Ba, Period 6) as metals. One line in their answer contains an error, click it.
Mg and Ba are both in Group 2 (alkaline earth metals).
Going from Mg to Ba (down the group), atomic radius increases and shielding increases.
Metals react by losing their outer electrons to form positive ions.
Therefore Ba is less reactive than Mg, because its outer electrons are more shielded and harder to lose.
02
Short answer
ApplyApply4 MARKS
Q1. 6. The following observations are recorded in a halogen displacement experiment: Chlorine water added to KBr solution → orange-brown colour develops (Br₂ formed). Bromine water added to KI solution → purple colour develops (I₂ formed). Iodine solution added to KCl solution → no colour change. Arrange Cl₂, Br₂, and I₂ in order of decreasing reactivity as oxidising agents, and explain the trend using the periodic table.
auto-saved
ApplyApply4 MARKS
Q2. 7. Explain, using electronegativity and bond polarity, why HF is a polar molecule but F₂ is non-polar. In your answer, include a Δχ calculation for each bond and describe the charge distribution.
auto-saved
📖 Comprehensive answers (click to reveal)
Activity 1
1. (a) H–F: |Δχ| = 4.0−2.2 = 1.8 ≥ 1.7 → ionic (or very strongly polar covalent, many sources classify H–F as polar covalent with very high polarity due to the discrete H–F bond; |Δχ|=1.8 sits right at the boundary. Accept "polar covalent" with δ− on F and δ+ on H). (b) Mg–O: |Δχ| = 3.4−1.3 = 2.1 ≥ 1.7 → ionic; Mg gives electrons to O → Mg²⁺ and O²⁻. (c) P–Cl: |Δχ| = 3.2−2.2 = 1.0 (0.4–1.7) → polar covalent; δ− on Cl, δ+ on P. (d) S–O: |Δχ| = 3.4−2.6 = 0.8 (0.4–1.7) → polar covalent; δ− on O, δ+ on S.
2. Decreasing electronegativity: F > Cl > O > Al > Na. F (Group 17, Period 2): highest χ=4.0. Cl (Group 17, Period 3): χ=3.2, same group as F but lower period → lower than F. O (Group 16, Period 2): χ=3.4, same period as F but one group to the left → lower than F; higher than Cl because Period 2 vs Period 3. Al (Group 13, Period 3): χ=1.6, Period 3 but far left. Na (Group 1, Period 3): χ=0.9, far left of Period 3.
Activity 2
A: (a) Cs more reactive than Li, both Group 1 metals; Cs is in Period 6, Li in Period 2. Going down Group 1: atomic radius increases, valence electron is further from the nucleus and in a higher shell with more shielding → lower IE → much easier to lose the electron → Cs is far more reactive (reacts explosively with water). (b) F₂ more reactive than I₂, both Group 17; F is Period 2, I is Period 5. Going down Group 17: atomic radius increases, the valence shell is further from nucleus → weaker pull on incoming electron → harder to gain that electron → less reactive. F₂ is the most reactive non-metal known. (c) Ba more reactive than Mg, both Group 2; Ba is Period 6, Mg is Period 3. Larger radius, lower IE → easier to lose 2 valence electrons → Ba is more reactive.
B: Word equation: bromine + potassium iodide → iodine + potassium bromide (Br₂ + 2KI → I₂ + 2KBr). This shows Br₂ is more reactive than I₂ because Br₂ can displace I⁻ from solution (more reactive halogen displaces less reactive halide). Periodic trend: Br is in Period 4, I is in Period 5 (same Group 17). Going down the group, atomic radius increases → the valence shell is further from the nucleus → nuclear attraction on an incoming electron weakens → harder to gain an electron → I₂ is less reactive than Br₂ as an oxidising agent (electron acceptor).
❓ Multiple Choice
F has χ=4.0, the highest of all elements. O is 3.4, N is 3.0, Cl is 3.2.
|Δχ| = 4.0−0.8 = 3.2 ≥ 1.7 → ionic. K effectively transfers its 4s¹ electron to F.
Cs is below Li in Group 1, larger atomic radius, more shielded valence electron, lower IE₁ → easier to lose the valence electron → more reactive metal. A is wrong: Cs has lower electronegativity (not higher). B is wrong: all Group 1 elements have 1 valence electron. C is wrong: Cs has a LARGER radius, not smaller.
K (Period 4) > Na (Period 3) for metallic reactivity. B incorrectly uses mass. C is wrong: Mg reacts less vigorously than Na with water. D is wrong: F₂ is more reactive than Cl₂ (halogen reactivity decreases down the group).
Si and P are in the same period (Period 3), same shell shielding. P has Z=15, Si has Z=14 → P has one more proton → higher Z_eff → stronger attraction for bonding electrons → higher electronegativity (Si: 1.9, P: 2.2).
Short Answer Model Answers
Q6 (4 marks): Order (most to least reactive as oxidising agents): Cl₂ > Br₂ > I₂ (1 mark). Halogens react by gaining one electron to form a halide ion (X⁻); the more reactive halogen can displace a less reactive halide from solution (1 mark). Going down Group 17 from Cl (Period 3) to Br (Period 4) to I (Period 5), the atomic radius increases, the outer valence shell is further from the nucleus with more inner electron shielding (1 mark). This weakens the nuclear attraction on an incoming electron, making it progressively harder to gain that electron → reactivity as an oxidising agent decreases down the group. This explains why Cl₂ can displace Br⁻ and I⁻, Br₂ can displace I⁻ but not Cl⁻, and I₂ cannot displace either Br⁻ or Cl⁻ (1 mark).
Q7 (4 marks): HF bond: χ(H) = 2.2, χ(F) = 4.0. |Δχ| = 4.0 − 2.2 = 1.8 ≥ 1.7 (1 mark). The bond is ionic/highly polar (at boundary). Bonding electrons are strongly attracted toward F (more electronegative) → F end carries δ− (partial negative charge) and H end carries δ+ (partial positive charge) → the molecule has a net dipole → HF is polar (1 mark). F₂ bond: χ(F) = 4.0 for both F atoms. |Δχ| = 4.0 − 4.0 = 0 (1 mark). There is zero difference in electronegativity → bonding electrons are shared exactly equally → no partial charges → no dipole → F₂ is a non-polar molecule (1 mark). Both are diatomic molecules, but their polarity differs entirely because one has identical atoms (F₂) and one has different atoms with different electronegativities (HF).
✓
Check what actually stuck
Check what actually stuck
01
Take the full module quiz
quiz
A full module quiz covering every lesson in this module, not just this one. Set aside a decent block of time and treat it like a real assessment.