Chemistry • Year 11 • Module 2 • Lesson 15

Gas Stoichiometry

Build HSC Band 5–6 extended-response technique on gas stoichiometry calculations, evaluating molar volume choices, and analysing a student’s systematic error.

Master · Extended Response

1. Data + scenario: ammonia synthesis at the Orica plant, Kooragang Island

9 marks   Higher-order

Scenario. The Orica nitrogen plant at Kooragang Island, NSW, synthesises ammonia via the Haber process: N2(g) + 3H2(g) ⇌ 2NH3(g). An engineer measures gas flows and needs to calculate volumes at plant conditions. A student is asked to predict the volume of NH3 produced from a given volume of H2. The table below summarises measurements made at two different condition sets.

RunH2 volume fed inConditionsExpected V(NH3) produced (theoretical)
A9.00 LSATP (25 °C, 100 kPa)?
B9.00 LSTP (0 °C, 100 kPa)?

Assume 100% conversion for this theoretical calculation. All species are gases under both condition sets. Molar volumes: STP = 22.71 L mol−1; SATP = 24.8 L mol−1.

Q1. Analyse the data above by completing both calculations and then evaluating the significance of choosing the correct molar volume. In your response you must:

  • Calculate the expected volume of NH3 for both Run A (SATP) and Run B (STP), showing full working.
  • Identify which method you used (full 4-step or volume ratio shortcut) and justify your choice.
  • Quantify the absolute and percentage difference between the two answers.
  • Explain, in terms of Avogadro’s law and molar volume, why the volumes differ.
  • Evaluate what consequence using the wrong molar volume would have on an industrial gas measurement, using your numerical data.
Plan: Run A, all gases, same T and P → volume ratio = coefficient ratio; H2:NH3 = 3:2; V = 9.00 × (2 ÷ 3) = 6.00 L. Run B: same shortcut; same V(NH3) = 6.00 L. Then revisit: are the volumes actually different? They should be the same (mole ratios don’t depend on Vm). Explore why the question table hints they might differ, and what happens if a student mistakenly converts using the wrong Vm mid-calculation.

2. Experimental design, verifying the molar volume of CO2 at SATP

8 marks   Higher-order

Research question. A Year 11 student wants to verify experimentally that the molar volume of CO2 at SATP (25 °C, 100 kPa) is approximately 24.8 L mol−1. They plan to use the decomposition of a known mass of marble chips (CaCO3) in excess hydrochloric acid: CaCO3(s) + 2HCl(aq) → CaCl2(aq) + H2O(l) + CO2(g).

Constraints: The student has access to: digital balance (±0.01 g), 250 mL conical flask, gas syringe (0–100 mL, ±0.5 mL), rubber stopper and delivery tube, thermometer, excess 1.0 mol L−1 HCl. The experiment must be completed in a single 60-minute laboratory session.

Q2. Design the investigation. Include all of the following:

  • State the hypothesis as a testable prediction including the expected molar volume value.
  • Identify the independent variable, dependent variable, and at least two controlled variables.
  • Describe a procedure in at least five numbered steps, including how molar volume will be calculated from the results.
  • Calculate the mass of CaCO3 needed to produce exactly 50.0 mL of CO2 at SATP (show working). Use this as your recommended sample size.
  • Identify two sources of error and explain how each would affect the calculated molar volume (would it be over- or under-estimated?).
Mass of CaCO3: n(CO2) = 0.0500 L ÷ 24.8 = 0.002016 mol; ratio 1:1; n(CaCO3) = 0.002016 mol; m = 0.002016 × 100.09 = 0.202 g. Errors: gas CO2 dissolving in water → less gas collected → V underestimated → Vm underestimated. Temperature above 25 °C (exothermic reaction) → gas expands → V overestimated → Vm overestimated.
Answers, Do not peek before attempting

Q1, Sample Band 6 response (9 marks), annotated

Calculations, both runs:

For Run A (SATP) and Run B (STP): All species in N2(g) + 3H2(g) ⇌ 2NH3(g) are gases. By Avogadro’s law, at constant temperature and pressure, equal volumes contain equal moles, so the volume ratio equals the coefficient ratio directly, the volume ratio shortcut is valid for both runs [1, method identified and justified].

H2:NH3 coefficient ratio = 3:2. V(NH3) = 9.00 × (2 ÷ 3) = 6.00 L for both Run A and Run B [1, correct answer for Run A; 1, correct answer for Run B].

Difference between runs: The theoretical V(NH3) is identical (6.00 L) in both cases because the volume ratio shortcut does not depend on the value of the molar volume, it depends only on the coefficient ratio [1]. Absolute difference = 0 L; percentage difference = 0%. The molar volume cancels out when all species are gases at the same T and P: the ratio V(H2) / V(NH3) = n(H2) × Vm / n(NH3) × Vm = n(H2) / n(NH3) regardless of Vm [1, explanation with algebra or reasoning].

Where the wrong Vm causes an error: If a student mistakenly converts the 9.00 L of H2 to moles using the wrong molar volume before applying the ratio, then converts back, errors compound. Example: using Vm = 22.71 at SATP → n(H2) = 9.00 ÷ 22.71 = 0.3965 mol; n(NH3) = 0.3965 × (2 ÷ 3) = 0.2643 mol; V(NH3) = 0.2643 × 24.8 = 6.56 L, an error of 0.56 L (9.3%). The industrial consequence is a 9.3% mis-estimate of ammonia produced per batch; at industrial scale this could mean misallocation of storage tanks, incorrect billing of product, or safety risks from pressure build-up in downstream vessels [1, consequence identified and quantified; 1, industrial significance explained].

Avogadro’s law explanation: Avogadro’s law states that at constant T and P, equal volumes of all gases contain equal numbers of molecules. Therefore the mole ratio between H2 and NH3 is exactly reflected in their volume ratio (3 L H2 produces 2 L NH3). The molar volume value (22.71 or 24.8 L mol−1) sets the absolute scale but cancels in the ratio; the ratio is condition-independent as long as all species are at the same conditions [1, Avogadro’s law correctly referenced].

Marking criteria summary (9 marks): 1 = identifies and justifies volume ratio shortcut. 1 = correct V(NH3) Run A = 6.00 L. 1 = correct V(NH3) Run B = 6.00 L. 1 = explains the two answers are equal with mathematical/logical reasoning. 1 = explains how molar volume cancels in the ratio (or equivalent algebraic reasoning). 1 = demonstrates a concrete worked example of the error caused by using the wrong Vm. 1 = quantifies the percentage error (9.3% or equivalent). 1 = identifies at least one industrial consequence. 1 = uses precise chemical vocabulary throughout (Avogadro’s law, molar volume, coefficient ratio, SATP, STP).

Q2, Sample Band 6 response (8 marks), annotated

Hypothesis: If the molar volume of CO2 at SATP is 24.8 L mol−1, then when a known mass of CaCO3 is dissolved in excess HCl at 25 °C and 100 kPa, the ratio V(CO2) ÷ n(CO2) will equal 24.8 L mol−1. IV = mass of CaCO3; DV = volume of CO2 collected (mL); controlled: concentration of HCl (excess; 1.0 mol L−1), temperature (25 °C; measured with thermometer), pressure (100 kPa; atmospheric) [1, hypothesis + IV, DV + 2 controlled variables].

Recommended sample mass calculation: n(CO2) = 0.0500 L ÷ 24.8 L mol−1 = 0.002016 mol; ratio 1:1 → n(CaCO3) = 0.002016 mol; m(CaCO3) = 0.002016 × 100.09 = 0.202 g [1, correct mass with working].

Procedure: (1) Measure and record the laboratory temperature (aim 25 °C) and atmospheric pressure. (2) Accurately weigh 0.202 g of marble chips (CaCO3) on a balance (±0.01 g). (3) Add 50 mL of 1.0 mol L−1 HCl to the conical flask; connect the gas syringe via the rubber stopper and delivery tube; ensure all joints are airtight. (4) Add the marble chips to the flask and reseal immediately; record the syringe volume every 30 s until no further gas is produced. (5) Read the total volume of CO2 collected (V, mL) from the syringe when volume is stable. Calculate n(CaCO3) = m ÷ 100.09; since ratio is 1:1, n(CO2) = n(CaCO3); calculate experimental Vm = V(L) ÷ n(CO2) and compare to 24.8 L mol−1 [1, five steps; 1, calculation method described].

Error 1, CO2 dissolving in water: CO2 is slightly soluble in water; some gas dissolves in the HCl solution rather than reaching the syringe. Result: V(CO2) collected is less than the true value → calculated Vm = V ÷ n is underestimated compared to 24.8 L mol−1 [1, source identified; 1, direction of error explained].

Error 2, Reaction is exothermic; temperature above 25 °C: The reaction of CaCO3 with HCl releases heat; the solution temperature rises above 25 °C during the reaction. At higher temperatures, gas molecules have more kinetic energy and occupy more volume, V(CO2) is measured while hot, then the gas cools in the syringe after collection, giving an inflated volume reading. Result: V(CO2) measured is slightly greater than at true 25 °C → Vm is overestimated [1, source identified; 1, direction of error explained].

Marking criteria summary (8 marks): 1 = hypothesis + IV, DV, 2 controlled. 1 = correct mass calculation (0.202 g). 1 = procedure in at least 5 numbered steps. 1 = calculation of Vm described. 1 = source of error 1 (CO2 dissolution) identified. 1 = direction of error 1 on Vm (underestimate). 1 = source of error 2 (exothermic heating) identified. 1 = direction of error 2 on Vm (overestimate).