A geometric series grows linearly in $n$; an exponential grows exponentially. Eventually the exponential wins, but proving "eventually" rigorously requires a careful induction on an inequality. Unlike sum identities (where LHS = RHS at the end), here you must show LHS for $k+1$ is at least the RHS for $k+1$. This lesson teaches the moves: $2^n > n$, $n! > 2^n$, Bernoulli's $(1+x)^n \geq 1+nx$.
Today's hook, Compare $n!$ and $2^n$ at $n = 3$ and at $n = 4$. Which is bigger? Why is this the first place to anchor the base case if you want to prove $n! > 2^n$ for all sufficiently large $n$? Sketch your reasoning before card 05 unpacks the proof.
0/5QUESTS
1
You are here
Recall, your gut answer first
Start with the warm-up and record your first reasoning.
01
Recall, your gut answer first
+5 XP warm-up
You want to prove $2^n > n$ for all $n \geq 1$. Before reading on what does the inductive step need to show? Specifically, given $2^k > k$ (the IH), how would you bound $2^{k+1}$ from below and show it exceeds $k+1$? Sketch your reasoning.
auto-saved
2
The two moves for inequality induction
Orient yourself to the lesson goals, language, and core approach.
02
The two moves for inequality induction
+5 XP to read
Every inequality induction rewards two habits: apply the IH to bound LHS$_{k+1}$ from below, then close the gap with a small auxiliary inequality (often $k \geq 1$, $k \geq 4$, or $1 + x > 0$). Inequality proofs are about chains of $\geq$ that all point the right way.
The bound-and-close strategy: (1) express $\text{LHS}_{k+1}$ in terms of $\text{LHS}_k$, (2) use the IH to substitute a lower bound for $\text{LHS}_k$, (3) finish with a side inequality that converts the IH-bound to $\text{RHS}_{k+1}$.
$\text{LHS}_{k+1} \;\overset{\text{IH}}{\geq}\; \text{something involving } k \;\geq\; \text{RHS}_{k+1}$
Inequalities often fail for small $n$. For $n! > 2^n$ the inequality fails at $n = 1, 2, 3$, start the induction at $n = 4$ and state this clearly. Wrong base case = whole proof fails.
Multiply IH by a positive
To use the IH on $2^{k+1}$, write $2^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k$ and multiply both sides of the IH by $2 > 0$. Multiplying by a positive preserves the inequality direction.
State the side inequality
After applying the IH, you usually need one more step like "and since $k \geq 1$, we have $2k \geq k+1$". Write this side inequality explicitly, markers want to see why the closing $\geq$ holds.
03
What you'll master
Know
Key facts
$2^n > n$ for all $n \geq 1$
$n! > 2^n$ for all $n \geq 4$ (note the base shift)
Bernoulli's inequality: $(1+x)^n \geq 1 + nx$ for $x > -1$ and $n \geq 1$
Understand
Concepts
Why the inductive step must produce $\text{LHS}_{k+1} \geq \text{RHS}_{k+1}$ and not equality
Why multiplying both sides of the IH by a positive preserves the direction
Why a side inequality (e.g. $k \geq 1$) is often needed to close the chain
Can do
Skills
Prove $2^n > n$, $n! > 2^n$, and Bernoulli's inequality by induction
Choose the correct base case (often $n_0 > 1$)
Build a chain of inequalities that points consistently the same direction
04
Key terms
Inequality inductionInduction where $P(n)$ has the form $f(n) \geq g(n)$ or $f(n) > g(n)$. The step must show $\text{LHS}_{k+1} \geq \text{RHS}_{k+1}$, not equality.
Bernoulli's inequalityFor $x > -1$ and integer $n \geq 1$: $(1+x)^n \geq 1 + nx$. Proved by induction using $(1+x)^{k+1} = (1+x)^k (1+x) \geq (1+kx)(1+x)$.
Side inequalityA small auxiliary inequality used after applying the IH to close the gap to $\text{RHS}_{k+1}$. Common examples: $k \geq 1 \Rightarrow 2k \geq k+1$; $kx^2 \geq 0$.
Monotonic multiplicationIf $A \geq B$ and $c > 0$, then $cA \geq cB$. This is how the IH gets "scaled up" to fit $\text{LHS}_{k+1}$. The sign of $c$ matters, multiplying by a negative reverses $\geq$ to $\leq$.
Base shift ($n_0 > 1$)Many inequalities fail for small $n$. The base case is then the smallest $n_0$ for which $P(n_0)$ holds and the inductive step also works. For $n! > 2^n$ the base is $n_0 = 4$.
MEX-P2NESA Extension 2 outcome: further proof by induction, including inequalities and Bernoulli-type results, beyond the sum-identity context of Extension 1.
3
Inequality induction, the template
Work through the concept and complete its check.
05
Inequality induction, the template
core concept
The same five-line structure as Lesson 07, only the algebra inside the inductive step differs. The step becomes a chain of $\geq$ rather than a chain of $=$. Each link must point the same direction.
State $P(n)$ as an inequality, e.g. "$P(n)$: $2^n > n$".
Base at the smallest $n_0$ where the claim is true. For $n! > 2^n$ this is $n_0 = 4$ (note: $3! = 6 < 8 = 2^3$).
Assume $P(k)$ as the IH.
Show $\text{LHS}_{k+1} \geq \text{RHS}_{k+1}$ via a chain: rewrite $\text{LHS}_{k+1}$ in terms of $\text{LHS}_k$, apply the IH (multiplied by an appropriate positive), then close with a side inequality.
Conclude.
Resolving the hook: $3! = 6$ and $2^3 = 8$, so $n! > 2^n$ fails at $n = 3$. At $n = 4$: $4! = 24$ and $2^4 = 16$, so the inequality first holds at $n = 4$. That is the correct base case.
Direction discipline. The step needs $\text{LHS}_{k+1} \geq \text{RHS}_{k+1}$. After applying the IH you usually get something like "$\text{LHS}_{k+1} \geq f(k)$"; you then need a side inequality to show $f(k) \geq \text{RHS}_{k+1}$. Two consecutive $\geq$ chained together give the result.
Inequality induction uses the same 5-line template; chain of $\geq$ replaces chain of $=$ · Base case: smallest $n_0$ where the inequality first holds (often not $n = 1$) · $n! > 2^n$ starts at $n_0 = 4$; $2^n > n$ starts at $n_0 = 1$ · Always close with an explicit side inequality (e.g. $k \geq 1 \Rightarrow 2k \geq k+1$)
Pause, copy the inequality induction checklist: chain of $\geq$, correct base case $n_0$, and always closing with an explicit side inequality, into your book.
Quick check: What is the correct base case $n_0$ for proving $n! > 2^n$ by induction?
4
Bernoulli's inequality, the structural classic
Build the next proof move and complete its check.
06
Bernoulli's inequality, the structural classic
core concept
We just saw the inequality induction template where a chain of $\geq$ replaces $=$, requiring an explicit side inequality to close the step (e.g. $k \geq 1 \Rightarrow 2k \geq k+1$). That raises a question: what is the canonical example that exam questions model? This card answers it → Bernoulli's inequality $(1+x)^n \geq 1+nx$ for $x > -1$, where the condition $1+x > 0$ enables multiplying the IH.
Bernoulli's inequality is the canonical inequality-induction result: for $x > -1$ and integer $n \geq 1$,
$$(1+x)^n \geq 1 + nx.$$
The condition $x > -1$ matters: it makes $1 + x > 0$, which is what lets us multiply both sides of the IH by $(1+x)$ without flipping the inequality. The proof:
Step: $(1+x)^{k+1} = (1+x)^k(1+x) \geq (1+kx)(1+x)$ since $1+x > 0$ and IH. Expand: $(1+kx)(1+x) = 1 + (k+1)x + kx^2 \geq 1 + (k+1)x$, since $kx^2 \geq 0$.
Hence $P(k+1)$, conclude by induction.
Common mistake. Forgetting the side inequality $kx^2 \geq 0$. After expanding $(1+kx)(1+x)$ you have an extra $kx^2$ term, it is non-negative for $k \geq 1$ and real $x$, which is exactly why the $\geq$ closes. Skipping this line drops the final structural mark.
Bernoulli: $(1+x)^n \geq 1 + nx$ for $x > -1$, $n \geq 1$ · Condition $x > -1 \Rightarrow 1+x > 0$ (lets us multiply IH by $1+x$) · Step: $(1+x)^{k+1} \geq (1+kx)(1+x) = 1 + (k+1)x + kx^2 \geq 1 + (k+1)x$ · Side inequality: $kx^2 \geq 0$, write it explicitly
Pause, copy Bernoulli's inequality $(1+x)^n \geq 1+nx$ for $x>-1$, $n \geq 1$, the inductive step $(1+x)^{k+1} \geq (1+kx)(1+x) = 1+(k+1)x+kx^2 \geq 1+(k+1)x$, and the side inequality $kx^2 \geq 0$ into your book.
Did you get this? True or false: in the inductive step of Bernoulli's inequality, we use the fact that $1 + x > 0$ (which follows from $x > -1$) to multiply both sides of the IH $(1+x)^k \geq 1 + kx$ by $(1+x)$ without reversing the inequality.
5
Worked examples · 3 in a row, reveal as you go
Follow the worked examples, then complete the check.
Worked examples · 3 in a row, reveal as you go
PROBLEM 1 · 2ⁿ > n
Prove by induction that $2^n > n$ for all integers $n \geq 1$.
1
State & Base. Let $P(n)$: $2^n > n$. When $n = 1$: LHS $= 2$, RHS $= 1$, and $2 > 1$ ✓. So $P(1)$ is true.
Statement is an inequality; base case is a direct numerical check at $n = 1$.
2
Assume. Assume $P(k)$: $2^k > k$ for some integer $k \geq 1$ (IH). Show. Required: $2^{k+1} > k+1$.
Write the goal explicitly. The step must end at $2^{k+1} > k+1$.
3
$2^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k \;\overset{\text{IH}}{>}\; 2k$ (multiplied IH by $2 > 0$, $\geq$ preserved). Side inequality: since $k \geq 1$, $2k = k + k \geq k + 1$. Hence $2^{k+1} > 2k \geq k + 1$, so $2^{k+1} > k+1$. Conclude. By induction, $2^n > n$ for all $n \geq 1$. $\blacksquare$
Two-link chain of $\geq$ (one strict): IH gives $> 2k$, side inequality $k \geq 1$ gives $2k \geq k+1$. Combining gives $> k+1$.
PROBLEM 2 · n! > 2ⁿ (BASE SHIFT)
Prove by induction that $n! > 2^n$ for all integers $n \geq 4$.
1
State & Base. Let $P(n)$: $n! > 2^n$ for $n \geq 4$. When $n = 4$: LHS $= 24$, RHS $= 16$, and $24 > 16$ ✓. So $P(4)$ is true. (Note: $P(3)$ is false since $6 < 8$, justifying the base shift.)
Base shift to $n_0 = 4$. State the smallest $n_0$ at which the inequality first holds.
2
Assume. Assume $P(k)$: $k! > 2^k$ for some integer $k \geq 4$ (IH). Show. Required: $(k+1)! > 2^{k+1}$.
Goal is the inequality for $k + 1$.
3
$(k+1)! = (k+1) \cdot k! \;\overset{\text{IH}}{>}\; (k+1) \cdot 2^k$ (multiplied by $k+1 > 0$). Side inequality: since $k \geq 4$, $k+1 \geq 5 > 2$, so $(k+1) \cdot 2^k > 2 \cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1}$. Hence $(k+1)! > 2^{k+1}$. Conclude. By induction, $n! > 2^n$ for all $n \geq 4$. $\blacksquare$
Multiply IH by $(k+1) > 0$. Side inequality $k+1 \geq 5 > 2$ scales $2^k$ up to exceed $2^{k+1}$. Chain closes.
PROBLEM 3 · BERNOULLI'S INEQUALITY
Prove by induction that $(1+x)^n \geq 1 + nx$ for all integers $n \geq 1$ and all real $x > -1$.
1
State & Base. Let $P(n)$: $(1+x)^n \geq 1 + nx$ for $x > -1$. When $n = 1$: LHS $= 1+x$, RHS $= 1+x$, so $\geq$ holds with equality. $P(1)$ is true.
Equality at the base is fine, the claim is $\geq$, not strict $>$.
2
Assume. Assume $P(k)$: $(1+x)^k \geq 1 + kx$ for some $k \geq 1$ (IH). Show. $(1+x)^{k+1} \geq 1 + (k+1)x$.
Set up the goal in the same form as the RHS for $n = k+1$.
3
$(1+x)^{k+1} = (1+x)^k(1+x) \;\overset{\text{IH}}{\geq}\; (1+kx)(1+x)$ (since $1+x > 0$, multiplying preserves $\geq$). Expand: $(1+kx)(1+x) = 1 + x + kx + kx^2 = 1 + (k+1)x + kx^2$. Side inequality: $kx^2 \geq 0$ (since $k \geq 1$ and $x^2 \geq 0$). So $1 + (k+1)x + kx^2 \geq 1 + (k+1)x$. Combining: $(1+x)^{k+1} \geq 1 + (k+1)x$. Conclude. By induction, Bernoulli's inequality holds for all $n \geq 1$. $\blacksquare$
Two links: IH (uses $1+x > 0$ to preserve $\geq$); then drop $kx^2 \geq 0$. Both side conditions are made explicit.
Fill the gap: In the inductive step of $2^n > n$, we write $2^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k > 2k$ (by IH). Then since $k \geq 1$, we have $2k \geq k + m$, where $m =$ . Hence $2^{k+1} > k+1$.
6
Misconceptions to fix · the 3 traps that cost marks
Correct the common traps and test your understanding.
Misconceptions to fix · the 3 traps that cost marks
Trap 01
Using the wrong base case
Trying to prove $n! > 2^n$ starting from $n = 1$, but the inequality fails for $n = 1, 2, 3$. The base case must be the smallest $n_0$ for which the inequality is true; for $n! > 2^n$ this is $n_0 = 4$. State the base shift explicitly so markers see you understand why.
Trap 02
Reversing the inequality direction
If you multiply both sides of the IH by a negative quantity, $\geq$ becomes $\leq$, and the proof breaks. For Bernoulli, the condition $x > -1$ is precisely what guarantees $1 + x > 0$ so the multiplication preserves direction. Forgetting this condition is the most common Bernoulli error.
Trap 03
Missing the side inequality
After applying the IH you typically get $\text{LHS}_{k+1} \geq f(k)$. You still need a separate $f(k) \geq \text{RHS}_{k+1}$ step. Skipping the side inequality is the single biggest cause of lost marks in inequality induction. Always write something like "since $k \geq 1$, $2k \geq k+1$" or "since $kx^2 \geq 0$".
Did you get this? True or false: in proving $n! > 2^n$ by induction, it is acceptable to use $n_0 = 1$ as the base case provided we check that the inductive step works.
7
Revisit your thinking
Complete the practice activities and revisit your opening thinking.
Activities · practice with the ideas
1
Prove by induction that $2^n > n$ for all $n \geq 1$. Show the IH multiplication and side inequality explicitly.
2
Prove by induction that $n! > 2^n$ for all $n \geq 4$. State why the base case must be $n_0 = 4$ and not $n_0 = 1$.
3
Prove Bernoulli's inequality: $(1+x)^n \geq 1 + nx$ for $x > -1$ and integer $n \geq 1$. Make every step (IH multiplication, side inequality $kx^2 \geq 0$) explicit.
4
Prove by induction that $3^n > 2n + 1$ for all $n \geq 2$. Identify the correct base case and the side inequality you need.
5
In the inductive step of Bernoulli's inequality, why is the condition $x > -1$ essential? What goes wrong if you allow $x = -2$?
Odd one out: Three of these statements about inequality induction are correct. Which one is NOT?
11
Revisit your thinking
Earlier you sketched how to prove $2^n > n$: starting from $2^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k$ and using the IH to bound this by $2k$.
The complete chain is: $2^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k > 2k$ (by IH, multiplying by $2 > 0$), and since $k \geq 1$, $2k \geq k + 1$. Combining the two $\geq$ steps gives $2^{k+1} > k+1$. The side inequality $k \geq 1 \Rightarrow 2k \geq k+1$ is the part students most often skip, it's also the only thing standing between you and full marks.
auto-saved
1
Show what you have learned
Multiple choice, then short answer under exam conditions.
01
Multiple choice
+5 XP per correct · +25 XP all-correct
Pick your answer, then rate your confidence. That tells the system what to drill next. Each retry pulls a fresh mix from the bank.
02
Short answer
ApplyBand 33 marks
Q1. Prove by induction that $2^n > n$ for all integers $n \geq 1$. (3 marks)
auto-saved
ApplyBand 43 marks
Q2. Prove by induction that $n! > 2^n$ for all integers $n \geq 4$. State why $n_0 = 4$ is the correct base case. (3 marks)
auto-saved
AnalyseBand 54 marks
Q3. Prove Bernoulli's inequality $(1+x)^n \geq 1 + nx$ by induction for $x > -1$ and integer $n \geq 1$. Make explicit (a) where the IH is used, (b) where $1 + x > 0$ is used, and (c) where $kx^2 \geq 0$ is used. (4 marks)
5. The condition $x > -1$ gives $1 + x > 0$, so multiplying the IH by $1 + x$ preserves $\geq$. If $x = -2$, then $1+x = -1 < 0$, so multiplying would flip $\geq$ to $\leq$ and the chain breaks. Also $(1+x)^n = (-1)^n$ alternates between $1$ and $-1$, while $1+nx = 1 - 2n$ is large negative, Bernoulli still holds numerically but the inductive proof method fails.
Q1 (3 marks): State $P(n)$ + base ✓ [1]. Step: $2^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k > 2k$ (IH used) [1]. Side inequality $2k \geq k+1$ + conclusion [1].
Q2 (3 marks): Justify base shift to $n_0 = 4$ with $3! = 6 < 8$ [1]. Base $4! = 24 > 16$ + assume IH [1]. Step uses IH and $k+1 \geq 5 > 2$; conclusion [1].
Q3 (4 marks): State $P(n)$ + base $n=1$ ✓ [1]. Assume IH; multiply by $(1+x)$, note $1+x > 0$ from $x > -1$ [1]. Expand $(1+kx)(1+x) = 1 + (k+1)x + kx^2$; note $kx^2 \geq 0$ [1]. Conclude by induction with proper conclusion line [1].
1
Consolidate and move on
Sit the module quiz, then close the lesson off.
01
Take the full module quiz
quiz
A full module quiz covering every lesson in this module, not just this one. Set aside a decent block of time and treat it like a real assessment.