Equation of a Line, Parametric & Cartesian
The vector equation $\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda\mathbf{b}$ is one line written three ways. Splitting it component-by-component gives the parametric form; eliminating $\lambda$ gives the symmetric Cartesian form. Each form is best for a different question type, and being able to convert between them is the core skill of MEX-V1 line problems.
From Lesson 05 you know $\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda\mathbf{b}$. If $\mathbf{r} = \langle x, y, z \rangle$, $\mathbf{a} = \langle 2, -1, 4 \rangle$ and $\mathbf{b} = \langle 1, 3, -2 \rangle$, write three scalar equations by matching components. Sketch your reasoning below.
Vector $\to$ parametric: read off components. Parametric $\to$ Cartesian: solve each scalar equation for $\lambda$ and equate. Going backwards (Cartesian $\to$ parametric $\to$ vector) is the reverse: set the common ratio equal to $\lambda$, then read off $\mathbf{a}$ and $\mathbf{b}$.
The three-form ladder: vector $\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda\mathbf{b}$ at the top, parametric in the middle, Cartesian at the bottom. Each step removes (or restores) the parameter $\lambda$.
Parametric: $x = a_1 + \lambda b_1$, $y = a_2 + \lambda b_2$, $z = a_3 + \lambda b_3$.
Cartesian (all $b_i \neq 0$): $\dfrac{x-a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y-a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z-a_3}{b_3}$.
Key facts
- Parametric form: $x = a_1 + \lambda b_1$, $y = a_2 + \lambda b_2$, $z = a_3 + \lambda b_3$
- Cartesian (symmetric) form: $\dfrac{x-a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y-a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z-a_3}{b_3}$
- Cartesian form requires every $b_i \neq 0$
- If $b_i = 0$: that coordinate is fixed at $a_i$
Concepts
- Why parametric form is just the vector equation read component-wise
- Why eliminating $\lambda$ gives the symmetric Cartesian form
- How to recover $\mathbf{a}$ and $\mathbf{b}$ from a Cartesian equation
Skills
- Convert vector $\to$ parametric $\to$ Cartesian and back
- Handle the edge case where a direction component is zero
- Test whether a point lies on a line using any of the three forms
Starting from $\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda\mathbf{b}$ with $\mathbf{r} = \langle x, y, z \rangle$, $\mathbf{a} = \langle a_1, a_2, a_3 \rangle$, $\mathbf{b} = \langle b_1, b_2, b_3 \rangle$, matching components gives the parametric form:
If every $b_i \neq 0$, solve each equation for $\lambda$: $\lambda = \dfrac{x-a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y-a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z-a_3}{b_3}$. Dropping the $\lambda =$ gives the symmetric Cartesian form:
Worked through the hook with $\mathbf{a} = \langle 1, 2, -1 \rangle$, $\mathbf{b} = \langle 3, -1, 2 \rangle$:
- Parametric: $x = 1 + 3\lambda$, $y = 2 - \lambda$, $z = -1 + 2\lambda$.
- Cartesian: $\dfrac{x-1}{3} = \dfrac{y-2}{-1} = \dfrac{z+1}{2}$.
Degenerate case. If, say, $\mathbf{b} = \langle 0, 2, 5 \rangle$, then $x$ is constant ($x = a_1$) and the Cartesian form becomes $x = a_1$, $\dfrac{y - a_2}{2} = \dfrac{z - a_3}{5}$.
Parametric: $x = a_1 + \lambda b_1$, $y = a_2 + \lambda b_2$, $z = a_3 + \lambda b_3$ · Cartesian: $\dfrac{x-a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y-a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z-a_3}{b_3}$ (only when every $b_i \neq 0$) · $b_i = 0$ $\Rightarrow$ replace that fraction with $x_i = a_i$ · Each fraction equals $\lambda$, that is why they are all equal
Pause, copy the parametric form ($x=a_1+\lambda b_1$ etc.), the Cartesian symmetric form, the rule for $b_i=0$ (write $x_i=a_i$ instead of a fraction), and the fact that each fraction equals $\lambda$ into your book.
Quick check: The line $\mathbf{r} = \langle 2, -3, 5 \rangle + \lambda \langle 4, 1, -2 \rangle$ in symmetric Cartesian form is:
We just saw the chain vector → parametric → Cartesian: set $x = a_1+\lambda b_1$, $y = a_2+\lambda b_2$, $z = a_3+\lambda b_3$, then eliminate $\lambda$ to get $(x-a_1)/b_1 = (y-a_2)/b_2 = (z-a_3)/b_3$ (when no $b_i = 0$). That raises a question: how do we reverse the process, reading a point and direction off a Cartesian equation? This card answers it → $\frac{x-p}{u} = \frac{y-q}{v} = \frac{z-r}{w}$ gives point $(p,q,r)$ and direction $\langle u,v,w\rangle$; watch the sign.
Given a symmetric Cartesian equation $\dfrac{x - p}{u} = \dfrac{y - q}{v} = \dfrac{z - r}{w}$, the line passes through $(p, q, r)$ in direction $\langle u, v, w \rangle$. So the equivalent vector form is:
Reading carefully: the numerators give $\mathbf{a}$ (after flipping signs as needed: $x - p$ means $p$, not $-p$). The denominators give $\mathbf{b}$.
Degenerate Cartesian form. If the Cartesian appears as "$x = a_1$, $\dfrac{y - a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z - a_3}{b_3}$" then $b_1 = 0$ and the line is parallel to the $yz$-plane (its $x$-coordinate never changes). The vector form is $\mathbf{r} = \langle a_1, a_2, a_3 \rangle + \lambda \langle 0, b_2, b_3 \rangle$.
Point-on-line via Cartesian. A point $(x_0, y_0, z_0)$ lies on $\dfrac{x-a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y-a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z-a_3}{b_3}$ iff all three fractions evaluate to the same number. This is often quicker than solving the parametric system.
Cartesian $\dfrac{x-p}{u} = \dfrac{y-q}{v} = \dfrac{z-r}{w}$ $\Rightarrow$ point $(p,q,r)$, direction $\langle u, v, w \rangle$ · Watch sign: $x + 3 = x - (-3)$ so $p = -3$ · If one denominator is zero, that coordinate is constant (write it as $x_i = a_i$) · Point on line test: evaluate all three fractions; equal $\Rightarrow$ on the line
Pause, copy the Cartesian → vector reading rule (denominators = direction, constants after $-$ = point), the sign trap ($x+3 \Rightarrow p=-3$), and the point-on-line test (all three fractions equal) into your book.
Did you get this? True or false: the line with Cartesian equation $\dfrac{x+1}{2} = \dfrac{y-3}{-1} = \dfrac{z+4}{5}$ passes through the point $(-1, 3, -4)$ with direction $\langle 2, -1, 5 \rangle$.
Worked examples · 3 in a row, reveal as you go
A line has vector equation $\mathbf{r} = \langle 4, -2, 1 \rangle + \lambda \langle 3, 5, -1 \rangle$. Write the parametric form, then convert to symmetric Cartesian form.
A line has Cartesian equation $\dfrac{x+2}{4} = \dfrac{y-1}{-3} = \dfrac{z}{2}$. Write a vector equation of the line and find the point at $\lambda = 1$.
Write parametric and Cartesian equations for the line through $A(3, -1, 4)$ with direction $\mathbf{b} = \langle 0, 2, -5 \rangle$.
Fill the gap: The symmetric Cartesian form of the line $\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda\mathbf{b}$ is $\dfrac{x - a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y - a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z - a_3}{b_3}$, valid only when every is .
Misconceptions to fix · the 3 traps that cost marks
Did you get this? True or false: the Cartesian equation of the line through $(2, 5, -1)$ with direction $\langle 3, 0, 4 \rangle$ may be written $\dfrac{x-2}{3} = \dfrac{y-5}{0} = \dfrac{z+1}{4}$.
Activities · practice with the ideas
Convert $\mathbf{r} = \langle 0, 3, -2 \rangle + \lambda \langle 1, -4, 2 \rangle$ to (a) parametric and (b) symmetric Cartesian form.
A line is given by $\dfrac{x-1}{2} = \dfrac{y+3}{4} = \dfrac{z}{-1}$. Write a vector equation and find the point at $\lambda = 3$.
Write the parametric and Cartesian forms of the line through $(2, 5, -3)$ with direction $\langle 0, 1, 4 \rangle$. Why is the standard symmetric form not usable in full?
Show that $P(7, -8, 5)$ lies on the line $\dfrac{x-1}{2} = \dfrac{y+2}{-2} = \dfrac{z-2}{1}$.
A line passes through $A(1, 0, 2)$ and $B(3, 4, -1)$. Write a vector equation, then the parametric and Cartesian forms.
Odd one out: Three of these correctly describe the line $\mathbf{r} = \langle 1, 2, 3 \rangle + \lambda \langle 2, -1, 4 \rangle$. Which one does NOT?
Earlier you converted $\mathbf{r} = \langle 1, 2, -1 \rangle + \lambda \langle 3, -1, 2 \rangle$ to parametric and Cartesian forms and asked what changes when a direction component is zero.
The parametric form is $x = 1 + 3\lambda$, $y = 2 - \lambda$, $z = -1 + 2\lambda$; the Cartesian form is $\dfrac{x-1}{3} = \dfrac{y-2}{-1} = \dfrac{z+1}{2}$. If any $b_i$ were zero, you'd have had to split that coordinate off as a constant. The crucial insight is that all three forms describe the same line they just emphasise different aspects (parameter, components, ratios). Choose the form that best fits the question.
Pick your answer, then rate your confidence. That tells the system what to drill next. Each retry pulls a fresh mix from the bank.
Q1. Convert $\mathbf{r} = \langle 3, -1, 2 \rangle + \lambda \langle 1, 4, -2 \rangle$ to parametric and symmetric Cartesian form. (2 marks)
Q2. A line has Cartesian equation $\dfrac{x+2}{3} = \dfrac{y-4}{-1} = \dfrac{z-1}{2}$. Write a vector equation, and show that the point $P(7, -1, 7)$ lies on the line. (3 marks)
Q3. The line $\ell$ passes through $A(2, 3, -1)$ with direction $\mathbf{d} = \langle 0, 4, -2 \rangle$. Write parametric equations for $\ell$, then explain why the standard symmetric Cartesian form must be modified, and write the modified form. (3 marks)
Comprehensive answers (click to reveal)
Activity answers:
1. (a) $x = \lambda$, $y = 3 - 4\lambda$, $z = -2 + 2\lambda$. (b) $\dfrac{x}{1} = \dfrac{y - 3}{-4} = \dfrac{z + 2}{2}$ (or equivalently $x = \dfrac{y-3}{-4} = \dfrac{z+2}{2}$).
2. Point $(1, -3, 0)$, direction $\langle 2, 4, -1 \rangle$. $\mathbf{r} = \langle 1, -3, 0 \rangle + \lambda \langle 2, 4, -1 \rangle$. At $\lambda = 3$: $\mathbf{r} = \langle 7, 9, -3 \rangle$.
3. Parametric: $x = 2$, $y = 5 + \lambda$, $z = -3 + 4\lambda$. Cartesian: $x = 2$, $\dfrac{y - 5}{1} = \dfrac{z + 3}{4}$. The fraction $\dfrac{x - 2}{0}$ is undefined, so $x = 2$ must be stated separately.
4. Substitute: $(7 - 1)/2 = 3$; $(-8 + 2)/(-2) = 3$; $(5 - 2)/1 = 3$. All three equal $3$, so $P$ lies on the line (at $\lambda = 3$).
5. $\mathbf{b} = \mathbf{B} - \mathbf{A} = \langle 2, 4, -3 \rangle$. Vector: $\mathbf{r} = \langle 1, 0, 2 \rangle + \lambda \langle 2, 4, -3 \rangle$. Parametric: $x = 1 + 2\lambda$, $y = 4\lambda$, $z = 2 - 3\lambda$. Cartesian: $\dfrac{x-1}{2} = \dfrac{y}{4} = \dfrac{z-2}{-3}$.
Q1 (2 marks): Parametric: $x = 3 + \lambda$, $y = -1 + 4\lambda$, $z = 2 - 2\lambda$ [1]. Cartesian: $\dfrac{x-3}{1} = \dfrac{y+1}{4} = \dfrac{z-2}{-2}$ [1].
Q2 (3 marks): Point $(-2, 4, 1)$, direction $\langle 3, -1, 2 \rangle$ $\Rightarrow$ $\mathbf{r} = \langle -2, 4, 1 \rangle + \lambda \langle 3, -1, 2 \rangle$ [1]. Test $P(7, -1, 7)$: $\dfrac{7+2}{3} = 3$; $\dfrac{-1-4}{-1} = 5$, these are not equal, so $P$ does NOT lie on the line. (Marking note: if instead $P = (7, 1, 7)$: $\dfrac{9}{3} = 3$, $\dfrac{-3}{-1} = 3$, $\dfrac{6}{2} = 3$ ✓.) Award marks for correct vector form [1] and a correct, well-justified point-on-line test [1]. (NESA MEX-V1.)
Q3 (3 marks): Parametric: $x = 2$, $y = 3 + 4\lambda$, $z = -1 - 2\lambda$ [1]. Because $d_1 = 0$, the fraction $\dfrac{x-2}{0}$ is undefined, so the standard symmetric form fails [1]. Modified Cartesian: $x = 2$, $\dfrac{y-3}{4} = \dfrac{z+1}{-2}$ [1].
A full module quiz covering every lesson in this module, not just this one. Set aside a decent block of time and treat it like a real assessment.
Start the module quiz →Mark lesson as complete
Tick when you've finished the practice and review.