Throw a ball straight up. Gravity pulls it down; air drag also pulls it down (because drag opposes the upward velocity). Both forces work against the motion, so the deceleration is larger than $g$. This lesson teaches you to set up $\dot v = -g - kv$ (or $-g - kv^2$), integrate to find the time of maximum height and use $v\,dv/dx$ to find the maximum height itself.
Today's hook, A ball is thrown straight up at $u$ m/s and decelerates under both gravity and air resistance. Without solving anything, decide: (a) is the time to reach maximum height greater than, less than, or equal to $u/g$? (b) Is the maximum height greater or less than $u^2/(2g)$? (c) On the way down, does gravity and resistance still both point downward? Check after card 05.
0/5QUESTS
1
You are here
Recall, your gut answer first
+5 XP warm-up A ball is thrown vertically upward with speed in a vacuum (no drag).
01
Recall, your gut answer first
+5 XP warm-up
A ball is thrown vertically upward with speed $u$ in a vacuum (no drag). Recall: time to max height is $u/g$; max height is $u^2/(2g)$. Now imagine air drag is switched on. Will both of these numbers go up or down? Why?
auto-saved
2
The two moves for vertical rising motion
+5 XP to read Every rising-with-resistance problem rewards two habits: choose "up positive" and write both downward forces...
02
The two moves for vertical rising motion
+5 XP to read
Every rising-with-resistance problem rewards two habits: choose "up positive" and write both downward forces with minus signs, then pick $dv/dt$ for time questions or $v\,dv/dx$ for height questions. Both gravity and drag are negative while $v > 0$, this is the most-missed sign.
The sign-derivative-target reading: (1) "up" is positive, so $g$ and the drag term both carry minus signs while rising; (2) decide whether the target is time or height; (3) use $dv/dt$ to find time to apex, $v\,dv/dx$ to find height of apex.
Maximum height occurs when $v = 0$, both upward motion and any "instant" of pause happen here. Solve $v(t) = 0$ for time to apex; substitute into $x(t)$ for the height.
Drag shortens both time AND height
Compared to vacuum: $t^* < u/g$ (you reach the top quicker) and $H < u^2/(2g)$ (you don't go as high). Drag always strictly reduces apex parameters.
Resistance sign flips on the way down
While rising ($v > 0$), drag $= -kv$ (downward). While falling ($v < 0$), drag points upward. The rising equation $\dot v = -g - kv$ is only valid until $v = 0$.
03
What you'll master
Know
Key facts
Rising under linear drag (up positive): $\dot v = -g - kv$
Rising under quadratic drag: $\dot v = -g - kv^2$
Apex condition: $v = 0$
$v\,\dfrac{dv}{dx}$ gives $v$ as a function of position
Understand
Concepts
Why both forces are negative while rising
Why time to apex and apex height are both smaller than in vacuum
Why the rising equation breaks at $v = 0$ (sign flip during fall)
Can do
Skills
Integrate $\dot v = -g - kv$ to find $t^*$ when $v = 0$
Use $v\,dv/dx$ to find apex height $H$
Handle quadratic-drag rising with the standard $\arctan$ form
04
Key terms
Up-positive convention$x$ measured upward from the launch point; $v = dx/dt$. Gravity and (rising) drag are both negative quantities.
Rising equation (linear drag)$\dot v = -g - kv$, valid for $v > 0$. Combines weight and drag, both pointing down.
Rising equation (quadratic drag)$\dot v = -g - kv^2$, valid for $v > 0$. Integrates to an $\arctan$ form for $t$.
Apex (maximum height)The instant when $v = 0$. Time to apex: $t^*$; height of apex: $H = x(t^*)$.
$v\,dv/dx$ formIdentity $dv/dt = v\,dv/dx$. Use to integrate directly from $u$ to $0$ in $v$ while $x$ goes from $0$ to $H$, gives apex height without going through $t$.
Drag-vs-vacuum comparedWith drag: $t^* < u/g$ and $H < u^2/(2g)$. Both quantities strictly decrease when drag is present.
MEX-M1NESA outcome (Applications of Calculus to Mechanics): solves problems involving vertical motion with resistance, including rising under gravity.
3
Rising under linear drag: $\dot v = -g - kv$
A particle of mass $m$ is thrown vertically upward at speed $u$.
05
Rising under linear drag: $\dot v = -g - kv$
core concept
A particle of mass $m$ is thrown vertically upward at speed $u$. Take $x$ positive upward. Net downward force while rising is weight plus drag: $mg + mkv$. Newton's second law:
Time to apex: set $v = 0$: $(g+ku)e^{-kt^*} = g \;\Rightarrow\; t^* = \dfrac{1}{k}\ln\!\left(1 + \dfrac{ku}{g}\right)$.
For the height, switch to $v\,dv/dx = -(g+kv)$, separate as $\dfrac{v\,dv}{g+kv} = -dx$, and integrate from $v = u$, $x = 0$ to $v = 0$, $x = H$. The standard split $\dfrac{v}{g+kv} = \dfrac{1}{k} - \dfrac{g/k}{g+kv}$ gives:
Connecting to the hook. In vacuum, $t^* = u/g$ and $H = u^2/(2g)$. With drag, both decrease: $\ln(1 + ku/g) < ku/g$ for $ku/g > 0$, so $t^* < u/g$. Drag dissipates energy on the way up, so apex altitude is reduced.
Rising (linear drag): $\dot v = -(g + kv)$, both forces point down while $v > 0$ · $v(t) = \dfrac{(g+ku)e^{-kt} - g}{k}$ · Time to apex: $t^* = \dfrac{1}{k}\ln\!\left(1 + \dfrac{ku}{g}\right) < u/g$ · Apex height: $H = \dfrac{u}{k} - \dfrac{g}{k^2}\ln\!\left(1 + \dfrac{ku}{g}\right) < \dfrac{u^2}{2g}$
Pause, copy the linear-drag rising ODE $\dot v = -(g+kv)$, the time-to-apex $t^* = (1/k)\ln(1+ku/g)$, the apex height $H = u/k - (g/k^2)\ln(1+ku/g)$, and the apex-height inequality $H < u^2/(2g)$ into your book.
Quick check: A particle is projected vertically upward at $u$ m/s and decelerates under $\dot v = -g - kv$. The time $t^*$ to reach maximum height is:
4
Rising under quadratic drag: $\dot v = -g - kv^2$
We just saw rising under linear drag : decays to rest in finite time at height \dot v = -(g+kv^2)t^*H\int dv/(g+kv^2) =...
06
Rising under quadratic drag: $\dot v = -g - kv^2$
core concept
We just saw rising under linear drag $\dot v = -(g+kv)$: $v(t)$ decays to rest in finite time $t^* = (1/k)\ln(1+ku/g)$ at height $H < u^2/(2g)$, drag shortens range. That raises a question: how does the quadratic-drag case $\dot v = -(g+kv^2)$ differ, particularly the integral needed for $t^*$ and $H$? This card answers it → $\int dv/(g+kv^2) = (1/\sqrt{gk})\arctan(v\sqrt{k/g})$ gives $t^* = (1/\sqrt{gk})\arctan(u\sqrt{k/g})$ and $H = (1/2k)\ln(1+ku^2/g)$.
For larger projectiles, drag $\propto v^2$. The equation of motion while rising (up positive) becomes:
$$\frac{dv}{dt} = -(g + kv^2)$$
Separate: $\dfrac{dv}{g+kv^2} = -dt$. Factor out $g$ to put the integrand in $\arctan$ form. Let $\alpha = \sqrt{g/k}$; then:
Time to apex ($v$ goes from $u$ to $0$): $t^* = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{gk}}\arctan\!\left(\dfrac{u}{\alpha}\right) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{gk}}\arctan\!\left(u\sqrt{\tfrac{k}{g}}\right)$.
For height, use $v\,dv/dx = -(g+kv^2)$: separate $\dfrac{v\,dv}{g+kv^2} = -dx$. The numerator is half the derivative of the denominator, giving $\dfrac{1}{2k}\ln(g+kv^2) = -x + C$.
Apex height: from $v = u$, $x = 0$ to $v = 0$, $x = H$:
Common mistake. For rising motion, the drag $-kv^2$ is unambiguously negative ($v^2 > 0$). But the same expression cannot be used on the way down, falling motion has $v < 0$ in this convention, so $-kv^2$ would still oppose nothing useful. Switch to $\dot v = -g + kv^2$ for the descent.
Rising (quadratic drag): $\dot v = -(g + kv^2)$ · $\int \dfrac{dv}{g+kv^2} = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{gk}}\arctan(v\sqrt{k/g})$ · Time to apex: $t^* = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{gk}}\arctan\!\left(u\sqrt{\tfrac{k}{g}}\right)$ · Apex height: $H = \dfrac{1}{2k}\ln\!\left(1 + \dfrac{ku^2}{g}\right)$
Pause, copy the quadratic-drag integral $\int dv/(g+kv^2) = (1/\sqrt{gk})\arctan(v\sqrt{k/g})$, $t^* = (1/\sqrt{gk})\arctan(u\sqrt{k/g})$, and $H = (1/2k)\ln(1+ku^2/g)$ into your book.
Did you get this? True or false: in the model $\dot v = -g - kv$ (up positive), the time to reach maximum height is strictly less than $u/g$.
5
Worked examples · 3 in a row, reveal as you go
Worked examples · 3 in a row, reveal as you go
Worked examples · 3 in a row, reveal as you go
PROBLEM 1 · LINEAR DRAG, TIME TO APEX
A ball of unit mass is thrown upward at $u = 20$ m/s. Air resistance gives $\dot v = -10 - \tfrac12 v$ (taking $g = 10$). Find the time to maximum height.
Multiplying through to clear the fraction $\tfrac12$ makes the integral less error-prone.
2
At $t = 0$, $v = 20$: $C = 2\ln 40$. So $2\ln(20 + v) = -t + 2\ln 40$, giving $\ln\!\left(\dfrac{20+v}{40}\right) = -\dfrac{t}{2}$, i.e. $20 + v = 40 e^{-t/2}$.
Combine logs immediately and isolate the exponential, keeps the algebra tidy when solving for $t^*$.
3
Apex: $v = 0 \Rightarrow 20 = 40 e^{-t^*/2} \Rightarrow e^{-t^*/2} = \tfrac12 \Rightarrow t^* = 2\ln 2 \approx 1.39$ s. (In vacuum it would be $u/g = 2$ s, drag saves about $0.6$ s.)
Always compare with the vacuum value $u/g$ to sanity-check that drag has shortened the time.
PROBLEM 2 · LINEAR DRAG, MAX HEIGHT
Continuing from Problem 1 ($u = 20$, $g = 10$, $k = \tfrac12$), use $v\,dv/dx$ to find the maximum height reached.
The general formula $H = \dfrac{1}{2k}\ln(1 + ku^2/g)$ gives the same value, use it as a check: $\dfrac{1}{2/90}\ln(1 + (1/90)(900)/10) = 45\ln 2$.
Fill the gap: For rising motion under quadratic drag, $\dot v = -g - kv^2$, the maximum height is $H = \dfrac{1}{p}\ln\!\left(1 + \dfrac{ku^2}{q}\right)$. Give $p =$ and $q =$ .
6
Misconceptions to fix · the 3 traps that cost marks
Misconceptions to fix · the 3 traps that cost marks
Misconceptions to fix · the 3 traps that cost marks
Trap 01
Getting the sign of drag wrong while rising
With "up positive" and $v > 0$, drag opposes motion so it points down: write $-kv$ (linear) or $-kv^2$ (quadratic). Don't write $+kv$ "because drag is positive in magnitude", the magnitude is positive, but in the equation it carries a minus.
Trap 02
Re-using the rising equation on the way down
$\dot v = -g - kv$ only describes rising. After the apex, $v < 0$ in the up-positive convention and drag now opposes the downward velocity, i.e. acts upward. The descent equation is $\dot v = -g + kv$ (or $+kv^2$ for quadratic), with care over signs.
Trap 03
Using $dv/dt$ when the question asks for height
"Maximum height" $\Rightarrow$ use $v\,dv/dx$, separate, integrate $v$ from $u$ to $0$ and $x$ from $0$ to $H$. Going through $t$ adds an unnecessary stage and is more error-prone.
Did you get this? True or false: while a ball rises under linear drag with up-positive convention, both gravity and air resistance contribute negative terms to $dv/dt$.
7
Revisit your thinking
Activities · practice with the ideas
Activities · practice with the ideas
1
A particle is thrown up at $u = 15$ m/s under $\dot v = -10 - v$ (take $g = 10$, $k = 1$). Find the time to maximum height.
2
For the same setup, find the maximum height using $v\,dv/dx$.
3
Derive the general formula $H = \dfrac{u}{k} - \dfrac{g}{k^2}\ln\!\left(1 + \dfrac{ku}{g}\right)$ from $v\,dv/dx = -(g+kv)$.
4
Quadratic drag: a particle of unit mass has $\dot v = -10 - \tfrac{v^2}{40}$ and $u = 20$. Find the maximum height.
5
For quadratic drag, derive $t^* = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{gk}}\arctan\!\left(u\sqrt{k/g}\right)$ as the time to reach maximum height, starting from $\dot v = -(g+kv^2)$.
Odd one out: Three of these statements about a ball rising under linear drag (up positive) are correct. Which one is NOT?
11
Revisit your thinking
Earlier you predicted whether drag makes the time-to-apex and the apex height smaller or larger than the vacuum values $u/g$ and $u^2/(2g)$.
Drag strictly reduces both: $t^* = \dfrac{1}{k}\ln(1 + ku/g) < u/g$ and $H = \dfrac{u}{k} - \dfrac{g}{k^2}\ln(1 + ku/g) < \dfrac{u^2}{2g}$. The physical reason: while rising, gravity and drag both point downward, so the deceleration is greater than $g$ alone. After the apex the signs change, the rising equation is only valid for $v > 0$, a subtle but examinable point.
auto-saved
1
Show what you have learned
Multiple choice, then short answer under exam conditions.
01
Multiple choice
+5 XP per correct · +25 XP all-correct
Pick your answer, then rate your confidence. That tells the system what to drill next. Each retry pulls a fresh mix from the bank.
02
Short answer
ApplyBand 32 marks
Q1. A particle of unit mass is projected vertically upward at $u = 10$ m/s. Resistance gives $\dot v = -g - v$ where $g = 10$. Show that the time to reach maximum height is $t^* = \ln 2$ seconds. (2 marks)
auto-saved
ApplyBand 43 marks
Q2. For the same particle, use $v\,\dfrac{dv}{dx}$ to find the maximum height reached. Compare with the vacuum value $u^2/(2g)$. (3 marks)
auto-saved
AnalyseBand 53 marks
Q3. A projectile of unit mass moves vertically upward with equation $\dot v = -g - kv^2$, initial speed $u$. (a) Show that the time to reach maximum height is $\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{gk}}\arctan\!\left(u\sqrt{k/g}\right)$. (b) Hence find the maximum height in terms of $u$, $g$, $k$. (3 marks)