Drill 1: (i) $f(a)$ is defined; (ii) $\lim_{x \to a} f(x)$ exists, so the one-sided limits agree; (iii) the limit equals $f(a)$. At $x = 2$, $y = \tfrac{1}{x-2}$ has an infinite discontinuity: $f(2)$ is undefined and the function grows without bound on both sides, so condition (i) fails and there is a vertical asymptote.
Drill 2: $f(x) = |x-4|$ equals $4 - x$ for $x < 4$ and $x - 4$ for $x > 4$. The left gradient is $-1$ and the right gradient is $+1$. These are finite but unequal, so $f$ is not differentiable at $x = 4$: there is a corner at $(4, 0)$. It is continuous there, since both pieces give 0.
Drill 3: Continuity requires $3(2) + 1 = 2^2 + k$, so $7 = 4 + k$ and $k = 3$. Gradients: the left piece has constant gradient 3, the right piece has gradient $2x = 4$ at $x = 2$. Since $3 \neq 4$, $f$ is continuous but not differentiable at $x = 2$ — a corner. Choosing $k$ can fix continuity but cannot fix the gradient mismatch.
Drill 4: Differentiable at $a$ implies continuous at $a$. Taking the contrapositive, not continuous at $a$ implies not differentiable at $a$. A jump discontinuity means $f$ is not continuous, so no derivative can exist there, and no limit needs computing.
Drill 5: One good answer: $y = |x| + |x - 3|$, which has corners at $x = 0$ and $x = 3$ and is continuous everywhere. Another: a curve with a corner at one point and a vertical tangent at another, for instance built from $|x|$ near 0 and $(x-5)^{1/3}$ near 5. Both are continuous throughout because neither piece jumps.
Q1 (3 marks): (a) $f(2) = 2^2 + 1 = 5$ from the first piece, which owns $x = 2$. The right-hand limit is $\lim_{x \to 2^+}(4x - 3) = 5$. Both equal 5, and each piece is continuous in its own right, so $f$ is continuous at $x = 2$ ✓ [1]. (b) Left gradient: $\tfrac{d}{dx}(x^2 + 1) = 2x$, which is 4 at $x = 2$. Right gradient: $\tfrac{d}{dx}(4x - 3) = 4$. Both equal 4 [1]. (c) The one-sided gradients agree and $f$ is continuous, so $f$ IS differentiable at $x = 2$ with $f'(2) = 4$. (The line $4x - 3$ is the tangent to $y = x^2 + 1$ at $x = 2$, which is why the two pieces join invisibly.) [1]
Q2 (3 marks): (a) From continuity, the two pieces must agree at $x = 1$: $a(1)^2 + 3 = b(1) + 1$, that is $a + 3 = b + 1$. From matching gradients, $2ax$ at $x = 1$ must equal $b$: $2a = b$ [1]. (b) Substituting $b = 2a$ into $a + 3 = b + 1$ gives $a + 3 = 2a + 1$, so $a = 2$ and $b = 4$. Check: both pieces give 5 at $x = 1$, and both gradients give 4 ✓ [1]. (c) Each equation alone is one linear equation in two unknowns, so it has infinitely many solutions — a whole line of $(a, b)$ pairs. Differentiability is genuinely two conditions, not one: matching gradients alone allows the pieces to be parallel but separated (a jump), and matching values alone allows them to meet at a corner. Only together do they pin down a unique pair [1].
Q3 (3 marks): (a) $f(x) = x^3$ at $x = 0$: $f'(x) = 3x^2$ so $f'(0) = 0$, but the curve is increasing on both sides. It is a horizontal point of inflection, not a turning point [1]. (b) $f(x) = |x|$ at $x = 0$: the function decreases then increases, so $(0, 0)$ is a genuine minimum, yet $f'(0)$ does not exist, so it is not a solution of $f'(x) = 0$ at all [1]. (c) A corrected rule: the turning points of $f$ occur among the points where $f'(x) = 0$ together with the points where $f'$ fails to exist; each candidate must then be tested, by the sign of $f'$ either side or by the second derivative, to decide whether it is a maximum, a minimum or neither. The two counterexamples show that the original rule is wrong in both directions: it admits points that are not turning points, and it misses turning points that exist [1].