Module Review
You've now explored statistical analysis from data collection through to prediction. This review consolidates every concept from the module into a coherent framework, use it to identify gaps, strengthen understanding, and prepare for your examinations. This is your last lesson; make every XP count.
Practise this lesson
Three printable worksheets that build from foundations to mastery, or build your own from any module’s questions.
Rate your confidence in each key area before reviewing (1 = shaky, 5 = solid). This will guide where to focus your revision time.
Every formula and rule you need for Module 4 Statistics assessments:
Correlation coefficient $r$: $-1 \leq r \leq +1$ · $|r|$ measures strength · sign gives direction · $r \ne$ causation.
Statistical analysis builds in a logical sequence, each lesson extends the previous one:
Quick check: Data set: 8, 12, 15, 18, 22, 25, 28, 30, 35, 40. An outlier (value = 100) is added. Which measure of centre is MORE affected?
We just saw five pitfalls that cost marks, using mean for skewed data, quoting one statistic, omitting context, reversing skew direction, and missing units. That raises a question: knowing the pitfalls is one thing, what concrete habits during the exam stop you from falling into them under time pressure? This card answers it → four exam technique rules: show all working, interpret every result in context, check skew language matches the tail direction, and always include units.
- Show working: Method marks are awarded even when the final answer is wrong.
- Interpret in context: Do not just calculate, explain what the number means in the given situation.
- Compare systematically: Centre, spread, shape, always all three for comparison questions.
- Use statistical language: "median", "IQR", "correlation", "interpolation", these words signal understanding.
- Draw carefully: Label axes, use scales, mark key points (Q1, Q3, median, whiskers).
- State reliability: For every prediction, say whether it is interpolation or extrapolation and whether it is reliable.
Five exam pitfalls: using mean for skewed data; quoting only one statistic; stating values without context; reversing skew direction; missing units or scale. For each, the fix is to check for outliers, compare both measures, and always interpret in context.
Pause, copy the four exam technique rules: (1) show all working for method marks; (2) interpret results in context, not just numbers; (3) use the correct statistical term (median not mean for skewed data); (4) check that skew direction language matches the actual tail into your book.
Data: 12, 15, 18, 22, 25, 28, 32, 35, 38, 42. (a) Find mean and median. (b) Add value 100, which measure changes more? (c) A test on this data has mean = 70, SD = 10. Find the range for the middle 68%.
Median $= \dfrac{25+28}{2} = 26.5$ (average of 5th and 6th values)
New median $= 25$ (6th of 11 values)
$70 \pm 10 = 60$ to $80$
Fill the gap: A line through (2, 40) and (6, 80) has slope $m = $ . When $x = 4$, the predicted $y = $ .
Revision activities
Data: 12, 15, 18, 22, 25, 28, 32, 35, 38, 42. Find: mean, median, range, IQR. Is the distribution roughly symmetric?
A test has mean = 70, SD = 10 (normally distributed). What percentage score above 80? What percentage score below 50? Is a score of 95 unusual?
Box plot: min = 10, Q1 = 20, median = 35, Q3 = 50, max = 70. (a) Find IQR. (b) Are there any outliers (using 1.5 × IQR rule)? (c) Describe the shape.
Line through (2, 40) and (6, 80). Find the equation. Predict $y$ at $x = 4$ and at $x = 15$. Comment on reliability.
Match each situation to the best statistical approach:
Top 3 list: Name THREE things you must always do when comparing two distributions in an HSC answer.
You've covered 12 lessons of statistical analysis: from organising raw data to predicting outcomes with a line of best fit. The most important insight in the whole module is probably this: statistics is not just calculation, it is a way of thinking critically about data, uncertainty, and the claims people make from numbers. Every lesson has prepared you to be a better consumer and producer of statistical reasoning.
Look back at your self-assessment from Card 01. Which areas improved most? What still needs work?
Pick your answer, then rate your confidence.
SA 1. Data: 8, 12, 15, 18, 22, 25, 28, 30, 35, 40. (a) Calculate the mean, median, range, and IQR. (b) Add value 100. Recalculate the mean and median. Which measure is more robust? Explain. (2 marks)
SA 2. Two schools: School A mean = 78, SD = 5, $n = 200$. School B mean = 75, SD = 12, $n = 200$. (a) Compare the distributions comprehensively. (b) A student with $z$-score = 1.5 at School A transfers to School B with the same raw mark. What is their new $z$-score at School B? (c) Which school would you recommend for a risk-averse student vs a risk-tolerant student? Justify with statistics. (3 marks)
📖 Answers (click to reveal)
Drill 1: Mean = 26.7; Median = 26.5; Range = 30; IQR = Q3 − Q1 = 35 − 18 = 17. Roughly symmetric (mean ≈ median). Drill 2: 80 = mean + 1 SD → 16% above; 50 = mean − 2 SD → 2.5% below. 95 is 2.5 SD above mean, unusual. Drill 3: IQR = 50 − 20 = 30. Fences: 20 − 45 = −25 and 50 + 45 = 95. Max = 70 < 95 and min = 10 > −25, no outliers. Roughly symmetric (median 35 is midpoint of IQR 20–50). Drill 4: m = 10, b = 20; y = 10x + 20. At x = 4: y = 60 (interpolation, reliable). At x = 15: y = 170 (extrapolation, unreliable).
SA 1 (2 marks): (a) Mean = 23.3; Median = (22 + 25)/2 = 23.5; Range = 32; Q1 = 15, Q3 = 30, IQR = 15 [1]. (b) New mean = (233 + 100)/11 = 30.3; new median = 22 (6th of 11). Median is more robust, changed by 1.5 vs mean changed by 7 [1].
SA 2 (3 marks): (a) School A: higher mean (78 vs 75), smaller SD (5 vs 12), better typical performance AND more consistent. School B: lower average with wide variation [1]. (b) Raw mark = 78 + 1.5 × 5 = 85.5. New z-score at B = (85.5 − 75)/12 = 0.875. Student drops from well above average to moderately above average [1]. (c) Risk-averse: School A, more predictable, most students score 68–88 (within 2 SD). Risk-tolerant: School B, chance of exceptional result (above 99) but also risk of poor one (below 51) [1].
Five timed questions spanning all Module 4 topics. This is the final boss, your chance to prove you've mastered Statistical Analysis. Beat the boss to bank a tier.
⚔ Enter the final arenaClimb platforms reviewing all Module 4 concepts. Pool: lesson 12.
Mark module as complete
Tick when you've finished the practice and review for the entire module.