Reducing Balance Loans
A car dealer offers two loans: Option A at 8% reducing balance, Option B at 6% flat rate. Most people choose Option B because 6% sounds better than 8%. They are making a costly mistake. A flat rate loan charges interest on the original principal for the entire term, even as you pay it down. The true rate of a 6% flat rate loan is often 10–12%, nearly double the advertised rate.
Practise this lesson
Three printable worksheets that build from foundations to mastery, or build your own from any module’s questions.
A $20,000 car loan: Option A is 8% reducing balance over 5 years. Option B is 6% flat rate over 5 years. Which costs less total interest? Predict before calculating.
Before reading onwrite your gut feeling. We will revisit this at the end of the lesson.
Two fundamentally different loan types, understanding the difference can save you thousands of dollars.
Flat rate interest: $\text{Total Interest} = P \times r_{\text{flat}} \times n$
Reducing balance: Interest charged on current balance only. Use $M = PV \times \dfrac{r}{1-(1+r)^{-n}}$
True rate conversion: $r_{\text{reducing}} \approx \dfrac{2 \times n \times r_{\text{flat}}}{n + 1}$
Rule of thumb: True reducing rate $\approx 2 \times$ flat rate
Key facts
- Reducing balance vs flat rate
- True rate approximation formula
- Where flat rates appear in practice
Concepts
- Why flat rates are deceptive
- How to compare loan types fairly
- The mathematics behind each method
Skills
- Compare flat and reducing balance loans
- Estimate the true interest rate of a flat rate loan
- Make informed borrowing decisions
A flat rate loan calculates interest on the original principal for the entire loan term, regardless of repayments made.
$$\text{Total Interest} = P \times r_{\text{flat}} \times n$$Example: $20,000 car loan at 6% flat rate over 5 years.
Total interest $= 20000 \times 0.06 \times 5 = \$6{,}000$. Total repayment $= \$26{,}000$. Monthly $= 26000 \div 60 = \$433.33$.
Flat rates are common in car finance, personal loans, and consumer credit. They are banned or heavily regulated in many countries because they mislead borrowers.
A flat-rate loan charges simple interest on the full original principal for the whole term. True monthly repayment = (P + I)/n. Because you owe less as you pay down the loan but interest stays fixed, the effective rate is much higher.
Pause, copy the flat-rate repayment formula: monthly repayment = (P + I_total) / n, and explain why the effective rate is higher: you still pay interest on the original principal even after repaying most of it into your book.
Quick check: A $20,000 loan at 6% flat rate over 5 years. The total interest charged is:
A flat-rate loan charges simple interest on the full original principal for the entire term, you keep paying as if you owe the whole amount even after repaying half. A reducing balance loan charges interest only on the outstanding balance each period: interest = r × current balance. As you repay principal, the interest component falls each period, so total interest paid over the life of the loan is lower than a flat-rate loan at the same stated rate.
A reducing balance loan charges interest only on the outstanding balance each period. As you repay the principal, your interest bill falls.
Same example at 8% reducing balance (compounded monthly) over 5 years:
$r = 0.08 \div 12 = 0.00\overline{6}$, $n = 60$.
$$M = 20000 \times \frac{0.00\overline{6}}{1 - (1.00\overline{6})^{-60}} = \$405.53 \text{ per month}$$Total repaid $= 405.53 \times 60 = \$24{,}332$. Total interest $= \$4{,}332$.
A reducing balance loan charges interest only on the outstanding balance each period. As the principal falls, so does the interest component, this is how mortgages and most bank loans actually work.
Pause, copy the reducing balance interest formula: interest for each period = r × opening balance for that period, and note the consequence: as the balance falls, the interest component of each repayment falls, making the loan fairer than a flat-rate loan into your book.
True or false: An 8% reducing balance loan can cost less total interest than a 6% flat rate loan on the same principal and term.
Worked examples · reveal each step
$15,000 car loan. Dealer A: 5.5% flat rate over 4 years. Dealer B: 8% reducing balance over 4 years (compounded monthly). Which is cheaper? Find the true rate of Dealer A.
A $1000 loan at 25% flat rate over 2 weeks. Find total repayment and approximate annual equivalent reducing rate.
Reducing balance loans charge interest = r × current balance each period, so the true rate equals the stated rate. For flat-rate loans, the stated rate understates the true cost. To find the true effective rate of a flat-rate loan: either use the approximation (true rate ≈ 2 × flat rate), or solve for r by setting the present value of all repayments equal to the original loan amount using the PV annuity formula.
To compare a flat rate loan fairly with a reducing balance loan, convert the flat rate to an approximate reducing balance rate:
$$r_{\text{reducing}} \approx \frac{2 \times n \times r_{\text{flat}}}{n + 1}$$where $n$ is the number of repayment periods.
Example: 6% flat rate over 5 years (60 monthly periods).
$$r_{\text{reducing}} \approx \frac{2 \times 60 \times 0.06}{61} = \frac{7.2}{61} \approx 11.8\%$$The 6% flat rate is equivalent to approximately 11.8% reducing balance nearly double the advertised rate.
To find the true annual rate of a flat-rate loan: use the reducing balance formula or table to find the rate r such that the present value of repayments equals the original loan. The true rate is typically close to twice the flat rate.
Pause, copy the true-rate rule of thumb (true effective rate ≈ 2 × stated flat rate) and note when to use the full PV method: when exact precision is required, set PV = M × [1 − (1+r)^(−n)] / r and solve for r into your book.
Fill the gap: A 6% flat rate loan over 5 years (60 monthly periods) has an approximate equivalent reducing balance rate of %.
Common errors · the 3 traps that cost marks
Match each loan feature to its description:
Quick-fire practice · 2 activities
A $25,000 car loan: Option A is 6% flat rate over 5 years. Option B is 9% reducing balance (compounded monthly) over 5 years. Which is cheaper? By how much? Also find the approximate true reducing rate for Option A.
A furniture store advertises "0% interest for 12 months" on a $3,000 purchase but charges a $150 establishment fee and $10/month account-keeping fee. Is this really interest-free? What is the effective annual rate? Would a 10% p.a. reducing balance loan (compounded monthly) be cheaper?
Top 3 list: Name THREE real-world situations where flat rate loans appear. For each, explain one mathematical fact a borrower should check before signing.
Most people predict Option B (6% flat) is cheaper because 6% < 8%. But Option A (8% reducing balance) actually costs less total interest.
Flat rate: Interest $= 20000 \times 0.06 \times 5 = \$6{,}000$.
Reducing balance: Monthly $= \$405.53$, total $= \$24{,}332$, interest $= \$4{,}332$.
The reducing balance loan saves $1,668 despite the higher advertised rate. This is the flat rate trap, always convert to comparable terms before choosing a loan.
What has changed in your understanding? What surprised you most?
Pick your answer, then rate your confidencethat tells the system what to drill next.
Q1. A $20,000 loan at 6% flat rate over 5 years. The total interest charged is:
Q2. The approximate true reducing balance rate for a 6% flat rate loan repaid monthly over 5 years (n = 60) is closest to:
Q3. In a reducing balance loan, the interest charged in each period is calculated on:
Q4. A car dealer advertises a loan at "5% flat rate". Before accepting, a smart borrower should:
Q5. Flat rate loans are considered deceptive because:
SA 1. A $18,000 car loan is offered at 5% flat rate over 4 years. (a) Find total interest and monthly repayment. (b) Find the approximate true reducing balance rate. (c) Compare to an 8.5% reducing balance loan (compounded monthly) over 4 years, which is cheaper? (2 marks)
SA 2. A furniture store offers "12 months interest free" with a $150 establishment fee and $10/month account-keeping fee on a $3,000 purchase. (a) What is the total cost? (b) If paid in 12 equal monthly payments, what is the effective interest rate? (c) Would a 10% p.a. reducing balance loan (compounded monthly) be cheaper? (2 marks)
SA 3. (a) Derive the formula for converting a flat rate to an approximate reducing balance rate. (b) A payday lender charges 25% flat rate over 2 weeks on a $1,000 loan. Calculate the total repayment and the approximate equivalent annual reducing rate. (c) Explain, using mathematical evidence, why payday lending is considered predatory. (3 marks)
Comprehensive answers (click to reveal)
MC 1, A: Flat: Interest = 20000 × 0.06 × 5 = $6,000.
MC 2, C: r_red = (2 × 60 × 0.06) / 61 = 7.2/61 ≈ 11.8%.
MC 3, B: Reducing balance, interest each period is calculated on the outstanding balance, not the original principal.
MC 4, D: Always convert flat rate to equivalent reducing rate before comparing with other loan products.
MC 5, C: Flat rates charge interest on the full original principal throughout the term, even as the balance falls, making the true rate much higher than advertised.
SA 1 (2 marks): (a) Flat: Interest = 18000 × 0.05 × 4 = $3,600. Total = $21,600. Monthly = 21600/48 = $450.00 [0.5 mark]. (b) True rate = (2 × 48 × 0.05)/49 = 4.8/49 ≈ 9.8% reducing [0.5 mark]. (c) Reducing 8.5%: r = 0.085/12 = 0.007083, n = 48. M = 18000 × 0.007083/[1−(1.007083)^−48] ≈ $443.52. Total = 443.52 × 48 = $21,289. Interest = $3,289. Reducing balance is cheaper by $311 [1 mark].
SA 2 (2 marks): (a) Total = 3000 + 150 + 12×10 = $3,270. Extra = $270 [0.5 mark]. (b) M = 3270/12 = $272.50. Solve: 3000 = 272.50 × [1−(1+r)^−12]/r. By trial/iteration: r ≈ 1.5%/month = 18% p.a. effective [0.5 mark]. (c) 10% reducing: r = 0.00833, n = 12. M = 3000 × 0.00833/[1−(1.00833)^−12] ≈ $263.34. Total = $3,160. Yes, the 10% reducing balance loan is cheaper than the "interest free" deal [1 mark].
SA 3 (3 marks): (a) For n equal repayments, average balance ≈ P(n+1)/(2n). Total interest: P × r_flat × n = P(n+1)/(2n) × r_red × n. Divide both sides by P × n: r_flat = (n+1)/(2n) × r_red. Therefore r_red = 2n × r_flat/(n+1) [1 mark]. (b) Total = 1000 + 250 = $1,250. Simple annual = 25% × 26 = 650% p.a. Compound: (1.25)^26 − 1 ≈ 32,300% p.a. [1 mark]. (c) Annual rates of 650–32,000% are vastly beyond any reasonable cost of borrowing. Borrowers unable to repay see debt multiply rapidly. The flat rate structure disguises the true cost. These facts constitute mathematical evidence of predatory intent [1 mark].
Five timed questions on flat rate loans, reducing balance loans, true rate conversion and loan comparisons. Beat the boss to bank a tier, gold (90% + speed), silver (75%), or bronze (50%). Replays welcome.
⚔ Enter the arenaClimb platforms by answering questions on reducing balance vs flat rate loans. Pool: lesson 8.
Mark lesson as complete
Tick when you've finished the practice and review.