Designing a Statistical Inquiry
Everything that can go wrong with a statistical investigation is decided before any data is collected. This lesson is about the part most people skip: turning a vague question into something that can actually be answered.
Take the question "is our canteen good value?" and try to write down exactly what you would measure. You will find you need several decisions: value compared with what, judged by whom, and over which items. Write down three decisions you had to make, and note that a different person could reasonably decide each one differently.
A statistical inquiry begins by converting a question of interest, which is usually vague, into an aim and a hypothesis, which are precise. The test of a good aim is simple: could two people, working separately from your written aim alone, collect comparable data? If not, the aim is not finished.
Question of interest → aim → hypothesis → variables → plan → data
Each arrow narrows something. The question says what you are curious about; the aim says exactly what will be measured, on whom, and when; the hypothesis states what you expect to find, in a form that the data can contradict. That last point matters: a hypothesis nothing could disprove is not a hypothesis, it is an opinion.
Know
- The stages of a statistical inquiry, from question of interest to reported conclusion
- The difference between an aim and a hypothesis
- What makes a variable categorical, discrete or continuous
Understand
- Why a hypothesis must be falsifiable to be useful
- Why the design decisions must be fixed before any data is collected
Can Do
- Turn a vague question of interest into a precise aim
- Write a hypothesis the data could contradict
- Identify the variables in an inquiry and classify each one
A question of interest is where you start, not what you investigate. Compare these three versions of the same curiosity.
| Version | Statement | Problem |
|---|---|---|
| Question | Do students who sleep more do better at school? | Nothing here can be measured |
| Better | Is there a relationship between hours of sleep and test marks? | Which students, which test, over what period? |
| Aim | To investigate the relationship between average nightly sleep over one week and the mark achieved in the Year 10 mathematics half-yearly examination, for students in Year 10 at this school | None: this can be collected |
Apply the two-people test to the final version. Two students given only that sentence would measure the same thing on the same group. That is the standard an aim has to meet.
A hypothesis states what you expect, in a form the data could contradict.
Not a hypothesis: "Sleep affects marks in some way." Any result whatsoever is consistent with this, so collecting data cannot teach you anything.
A hypothesis: "Students who average more than eight hours of sleep per night will achieve a higher mean mark than students who average fewer than seven." Now a result where the two groups are equal, or where the second group scores higher, would contradict it.
Being contradictable is the whole point. An investigation is only informative if it had some chance of coming out the other way, and a hypothesis that nothing could disprove guarantees the investigation is uninformative before it starts.
Every inquiry has at least one variable, and naming them forces you to decide how each will be recorded.
Categorical variables take labels: favourite subject, method of travel to school, yes or no. These are counted into groups; you cannot average them.
Numerical discrete variables are counted: number of siblings, number of pets, goals scored. Values are whole numbers with gaps between them.
Numerical continuous variables are measured: height, time taken, hours of sleep. Between any two values there is another, and the precision is set by your instrument.
The classification is not bookkeeping. It decides what you may calculate and what you may draw: a mean is meaningless for a categorical variable, and a histogram needs a continuous one. Choosing the wrong display is usually a classification error made earlier.
A plan records five decisions, and records them in advance.
| Decision | Example |
|---|---|
| Who is the population? | All Year 10 students at this school |
| How will the sample be chosen? | Random selection from the roll, 40 students |
| What exactly is measured? | Sleep, self-reported to the nearest half hour, for seven nights |
| How is it recorded? | A shared spreadsheet, one row per student, columns for each night |
| What could go wrong? | Self-reported sleep may be over-estimated; some students may not complete all seven nights |
The last row is the one most often left out, and the most valuable. Naming a weakness in advance lets you design around it, and lets you say honestly, in the report, what your conclusion cannot support.
Watch Me Solve It · 3 examples
-
1Name what is vague"Too expensive" compared with what, for which items, and judged against whose prices? Three separate decisions are hidden in three words.
-
2Choose a comparisonCompare the canteen price of an item with the price of the same item at the nearest supermarket. That makes "expensive" measurable rather than a matter of opinion.
-
3Fix the scopeRestrict to the twenty most frequently sold items, priced during one week, so that the comparison is finite and repeatable.
-
4Write the aim and name the variablesAim: to compare the price of the twenty most frequently sold canteen items with the price of the same items at the nearest supermarket, during the first week of term. Variables: item name (categorical), canteen price (continuous), supermarket price (continuous).
-
1Ask what result would contradict itThere is none. Any amount of phone use could be described as "a lot" or "not a lot" after the fact, so the data can never disagree with the statement.
-
2Find the missing elementThere is no threshold and no comparison. A testable statement needs one or the other.
-
3Rewrite with a threshold"The mean daily phone use of Year 10 students at this school exceeds three hours." A mean of 2.4 hours would now contradict it.
-
4Check it can failState the contradicting result explicitly before collecting: a sample mean at or below three hours. Being able to write that sentence is the test.
-
1Year groupCategorical. The values are labels, and although they look like numbers, averaging them is meaningless. A column graph of counts suits it.
-
2Number of siblingsNumerical discrete. It is counted, so the values are whole numbers with gaps. A column graph or a dot plot suits it.
-
3HeightNumerical continuous. It is measured, and between any two heights there is another. A histogram suits it, since the values group into intervals.
-
4Walks to schoolCategorical, with two values. A two-way table or a simple column graph suits it, and it is often used to split the other variables into groups for comparison.
Brain Trainer · 4 problems
Four quick problems. Work each one, then reveal the answer.
-
1 Is "do people like our uniform?" an aim?
Which people, and what counts as "like"? Nothing here can be measured.No, it is a question of interest -
2 Classify the variable "time taken to run 100 m".
It is measured, not counted, and between any two times there is another.Numerical continuous -
3 Is "our team will probably do well" a hypothesis?
No result could contradict it.No, it is not falsifiable -
4 Which stage names what could go wrong?
It belongs in the plan, written before any data is collected.The plan
Multiple Choice · 5 questions
Which of these is a properly written aim?
A hypothesis is useful only if:
The number of text messages a student sent yesterday is:
Deciding which comparison to make AFTER looking at some of the data is a problem because:
Naming, in advance, what could go wrong with your data collection is valuable mainly because:
Short Answer · 3 questions
(a) Write an aim that passes the two-people test.
(b) Write a falsifiable hypothesis, and state what result would contradict it.
(c) Name three variables in your design and classify each.
"Aim: to see if music helps studying. Hypothesis: music makes a difference. I will ask some friends."
(a) Identify three separate problems.
(b) Rewrite the aim and hypothesis.
(c) State one thing that could go wrong with the data collection, and how you would design around it.
(a) A hypothesis must be able to be contradicted.
(b) The design must be fixed before any data is collected.
(c) The limitations must be stated in the report.
(a) Design A compares attendance at schools that have a breakfast programme with attendance at schools that do not. State two reasons why a difference found this way might not be caused by the programme.
(b) Design B measures attendance at one school for a term before the programme starts and a term after it starts. State two reasons why a difference found this way might not be caused by the programme.
(c) Describe a third design that addresses the main weakness of both, and state what it still cannot rule out.
Aim
What, on whom, over what period
Hypothesis
A prediction the data could contradict
Variables
Categorical, discrete or continuous
Plan first
Including what could go wrong
Your Badges
0 of 6Mark lesson as complete
Tick when you've finished Learn, Practice and the Stretch. Earns +85 XP and +25 coins.