The Scientific Process
Two students argue about which paper towel brand soaks up the most water. One says "this one, I just know it." The other says "let us actually test it." That second student is thinking like a scientist. Doing science is not random guessing; it follows a careful set of steps called the Working Scientifically processes. In this lesson you will walk through those steps, from asking a question all the way to sharing your results, and you will learn why a planned, fair test beats a lucky guess every time.
Printable Worksheets
Print or save as PDF, or build a custom worksheet from any module's questions.
Q1 Ā· You want to find out which of three brands of paper towel soaks up the most water. Write down, step by step, how you would test it fairly. It is okay if you are not sure of the right order yet.
Q2 Ā· A friend says "Cold water dissolves sugar faster, I can just tell." What is the difference between guessing this and actually testing it? Which one would you trust more, and why?
ā Know
- The practice of science involves using the Working Scientifically processes (NESA SC4-OTU-01, SC4-WS-04)
- The main steps of a scientific investigation, from question to communicating results
- Science relies on systematic observations and controlled experiments, not casual guessing (NESA SC4-WS-04)
ā Understand
- Why each step of the scientific process matters and how the steps fit together
- The difference between a systematic observation and a casual one
- Why a fair test, where you change only one thing, gives evidence you can trust
ā Can do
- List the steps of a scientific investigation in order
- Explain what makes an observation systematic and an experiment controlled
- Turn an everyday question into a simple fair test that changes one thing
Science is not only a set of facts to learn. Science is also something you do. The NSW syllabus says that the practice of science involves using the Working Scientifically processes. These are the skills and steps scientists use to find things out in a careful, organised way.
Working Scientifically means you do not just trust a hunch. Instead you ask a question, gather evidence, and check your thinking. A scientist who wants to know which paper towel soaks up the most water does not simply pick a favourite. They plan a test, measure carefully, and let the evidence decide.
The Working Scientifically processes include things like:
- Questioning and predicting: asking a question and making a sensible guess called a hypothesis.
- Planning and conducting: designing a fair test and carrying it out safely.
- Processing and analysing: recording data, then looking for patterns in it.
- Communicating: sharing your results clearly so others can check them.
You will meet each of these as we walk through a scientific investigation step by step.
A scientific investigation follows a clear path. Each step leads to the next, like rungs on a ladder. Here is the path, using the question "Does temperature change how fast sugar dissolves?" as an example.
- Question: ask something you can actually test. Example: does sugar dissolve faster in hot water than in cold water?
- Hypothesis: make a sensible prediction. Example: I predict sugar dissolves faster in hot water.
- Plan: decide what you will change, what you will keep the same, and what you will measure.
- Method: write the exact steps so someone else could repeat your test.
- Observe and measure: carry out the test and watch carefully, using a timer and measuring cups.
- Record: write down your results in a neat table as you go, not from memory afterwards.
- Analyse: look at your results and find the pattern. Example: the warmer the water, the faster the sugar dissolved.
- Conclude: answer your question using the evidence. Example: sugar dissolves faster in hotter water.
- Communicate: share your results so others can check or repeat them.
You do not always have to use every step, and sometimes a result sends you back to ask a brand new question. But this order gives you a reliable plan to follow.
- Hypothesis
- Record
- Analyse
- Conclude
- Make a sensible prediction before you test
- Write your results in a neat table as you go
- Look at your results and find the pattern
- Answer your question using the evidence
An observation is something you notice using your senses or instruments. But there are two very different ways to observe.
- A casual observation is quick and loose. Example: "I reckon the plant near the window looks a bit taller." You did not measure, you did not write it down, and you cannot be sure.
- A systematic observation is planned, repeated and recorded carefully. Example: you measure each plant with a ruler at the same time every day, write the heights in a table, and do this for two weeks.
The word systematic means "following a system", a clear and organised plan. Systematic observations are stronger because they can be repeated and checked. If another student followed your exact steps, they should get a similar result. That is what makes the evidence trustworthy.
The NSW syllabus is clear that science uses systematic observations and controlled experiments, not casual guessing. So whenever you observe in science, slow down, measure, repeat and record.
A controlled experiment is a test where you change just one thing on purpose and keep everything else the same. This is also called a fair test. It lets you be sure that any change in your result was caused by the one thing you changed, and nothing else.
Think about the sugar question: does temperature change how fast sugar dissolves? To make it a fair test:
- Change one thing: the temperature of the water (for example cold, warm and hot).
- Keep these the same: the amount of water, the amount of sugar, the type of sugar, and how much you stir.
- Measure: how long the sugar takes to fully dissolve.
If you changed the temperature AND the amount of stirring at the same time, you could not tell which one caused the sugar to dissolve faster. By changing only one thing, you keep the test fair. You will look at this idea in much more detail in a later lesson, but the key idea to plant now is simple: change one thing, keep the rest the same.
In a controlled experiment, or fair test, you change only ___ thing and keep everything else the ___. Science uses systematic observations and ___ experiments, not casual ___.
You might wonder why scientists go to all this trouble. Why not just guess? Because a guess can be wrong, and you would have no way to know. A fair test gives you evidence, and evidence lets you trust your answer.
Here is what a good scientific process gives you:
- It is repeatable. If someone follows your method, they should get a similar result. That builds trust.
- It is fair. Because you changed only one thing, you know what caused the result.
- It removes lucky accidents. Repeating the test and recording carefully means one odd result does not fool you.
- It can be checked. Because you communicate your method and data, others can test it too.
Imagine telling your class "this paper towel is best, trust me." Now imagine saying "I tested all three brands with the same amount of water, three times each, and brand B soaked up the most every time." The second answer is far stronger, because it is built on systematic observations and a controlled experiment. That is the power of working scientifically.
A student wants to test which of three paper towel brands soaks up the most water. They dip brand A in a big bowl for 10 seconds, brand B in a small cup for 3 seconds, and brand C under a running tap. Then they decide brand C is best because it felt the wettest. Predict: what has gone wrong with this test, and how could the student fix it to make it a fair, controlled experiment?
How close was your prediction?
At the start of the lesson you wrote a plan to test which paper towel soaks up the most water. Now write an improved, complete answer.
Your answer must: (1) list the main steps of a scientific investigation in order; (2) explain what you would change and what you would keep the same to make it a fair test; (3) explain why a systematic observation is better than a casual one. Use the words question, controlled experiment, systematic and evidence.
Q1. List, in order, at least five steps of a scientific investigation, from asking a question to communicating your results. (3 marks)
Q2. Explain the difference between a systematic observation and a casual observation. Give one example of each. (3 marks)
Q3. You want to test whether cold water or hot water dissolves sugar faster. Describe how you would set up a fair test. State the one thing you would change, two things you would keep the same, and the one thing you would measure. (4 marks)
Answers
ā¾MCQ 1
B. The practice of science involves using the Working Scientifically processes, the careful skills and steps scientists use. It is not lucky guesses, memorising facts alone, or voting on answers.
MCQ 2
D. Measuring each plant with a ruler every morning and recording the heights in a table is planned, repeated and recorded, so it is systematic. The other three are quick, loose impressions, which are casual observations.
MCQ 3
A. A controlled experiment, or fair test, changes only one thing and keeps everything else the same. That way you know the one thing you changed caused the result.
MCQ 4
C. The question is about temperature, so the one thing you change is the temperature of the water. The amount of sugar, the stirring and the amount of water must all be kept the same to keep the test fair.
MCQ 5
A. The conclude step is where you answer your original question using the evidence you collected. Making a first prediction, choosing equipment, and discarding results are not what concluding means.
Short Answer 1
Model answer: A scientific investigation goes: ask a question, make a hypothesis (a prediction), plan and write a method, observe and measure carefully, record your results in a table, analyse the results to find the pattern, conclude by answering your question, and communicate your results so others can check them. Any five of these in a sensible order earn full marks.
Short Answer 2
Model answer: A casual observation is quick and loose and is not measured or recorded, for example saying "the room feels hot today." A systematic observation is planned, repeated and recorded carefully, for example measuring the room temperature with a thermometer at the same time each day and writing it in a table. Systematic observations are stronger because they can be repeated and checked.
Short Answer 3
Model answer: I would change only the temperature of the water, using cold water in one cup and hot water in another. I would keep the same the amount of water and the amount of sugar (and also the type of sugar and the stirring). I would measure how long the sugar takes to fully dissolve in each cup. Because I change only one thing and keep the rest the same, it is a fair, controlled experiment.