Year 9 Science Unit 3 — Energy Block 2: Sources ⏱ ~40 min Lesson 13 of 24

Non-Renewable Energy Sources

Australia is the world's largest exporter of coal and the second-largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG). For over a century, these fossil fuels have powered our industries, heated our homes, and driven our economy. But they come with a cost: burning coal releases approximately 0.9 kg of CO₂ for every kilowatt-hour of electricity. This lesson explores how coal, oil, and natural gas formed over millions of years, how we extract and convert them into electricity, and why Australia faces the challenge of transitioning away from the very resources that built its prosperity.

Think First

Every time you charge your phone, turn on a light, or take a hot shower, you are using energy that came from somewhere. But where?

Before reading on, estimate what percentage of Australia's electricity comes from: (a) coal, (b) natural gas, (c) oil, (d) nuclear, (e) renewables. Write your estimates as percentages that add to 100%. You will compare them to real data at the end of the lesson.

Choose how you work — type your answers below or write in your book.

📖 Know

  • The main non-renewable sources: coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear
  • That fossil fuels formed from ancient organic matter over millions of years
  • The basic energy transformations in fossil fuel power generation

💡 Understand

  • Why non-renewable sources are finite and their extraction impacts
  • The relationship between burning fossil fuels and CO₂ emissions
  • How Australia's economy depends on fossil fuel exports

🔧 Can Do

  • Describe energy transformations in fossil fuel systems
  • Compare renewable and non-renewable sources using multiple criteria
  • Evaluate the environmental and economic trade-offs of energy choices

🇦🇺 Australia's Electricity Mix — Non-Renewable Focus (2024)

Australia's Electricity Sources Coal 46% Renewables 37% Gas 16% Non-Renewable Facts ⚫ Coal: ~46% of grid 🔥 Gas: ~16% of grid 🛢️ Oil: ~1% (transport) ☢️ Nuclear: 0% in Australia Aus = #1 coal exporter globally Aus = #2 LNG exporter globally Source: AEMO, 2024 data
1
⚫ Coal

The powerhouse of Australia's grid

Coal is a sedimentary rock formed from the compressed remains of ancient swamp plants that lived 300 million years ago. Over geological time, heat and pressure transformed plant matter into peat, then lignite (brown coal), then bituminous coal (black coal), and finally anthracite — the highest grade.

How a Coal Power Station Works Coal Chemical Furnace Heat Boiler Steam Turbine Generator Electricity ⚡ Chemical → Thermal → Kinetic → Electrical Efficiency: ~33-40% | Waste: ~60-67% as thermal + CO₂ CO₂ → atmosphere

Australia has vast coal reserves — approximately 147 billion tonnes, enough to last over 300 years at current production rates. The Bowen Basin in Queensland and the Hunter Valley in NSW are Australia's coal heartlands. In 2023, Australia exported 185 million tonnes of metallurgical coal (for steelmaking) and 190 million tonnes of thermal coal (for electricity). These exports earned $65 billion, making coal Australia's second-largest export after iron ore.

Coal power stations are approximately 33–40% efficient. A typical 1,000 MW station burns 300 tonnes of coal per hour — equivalent to the weight of 50 African elephants. The energy transformation chain is: chemical → thermal → kinetic → electrical. The remaining 60–67% becomes waste thermal energy (heating cooling water) and CO₂ emissions. A 1,000 MW coal station emits about 8 million tonnes of CO₂ annually — equivalent to the emissions of 1.7 million cars.

Australian Context
The Loy Yang Power Station: Located in Victoria's Latrobe Valley, Loy Yang A and B together generate 3,300 MW — enough to power 2 million homes. The station burns brown coal from an adjacent open-cut mine, making it one of the lowest-cost generators in Australia. However, it is also one of the most emissions-intensive: each megawatt-hour produces approximately 1.3 tonnes of CO₂. The Victorian government has committed to closing Loy Yang A by 2035 and Loy Yang B by 2047, replacing them with renewable energy and battery storage. This transition is complex: the Latrobe Valley has relied on coal for 100 years, and the closure will affect 1,000 direct jobs. The Victorian government has established a $540 million transition fund to retrain workers and attract new industries to the region.
2
🔥 Natural Gas

Cleaner than coal, but still fossil

Natural gas is primarily methane (CH₄), formed from the remains of marine microorganisms that settled on ancient seabeds. Over millions of years, heat and pressure transformed this organic matter into natural gas trapped in underground rock formations.

From Wellhead to Power Station: Natural Gas Well Methane Pipeline LNG Plant (-162°C) LNG Ship Gas Turbine ~60% eff. Electricity ⚡ Chemical → Thermal → Kinetic → Electrical Combined cycle gas = ~60% efficient | CO₂ = ~0.4 kg/kWh

Natural gas power stations are significantly more efficient than coal stations. A modern combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) reaches 60% efficiency — almost double that of coal. Gas also produces about half the CO₂ per kilowatt-hour: approximately 0.4 kg/kWh for gas versus 0.9 kg/kWh for coal. This is why gas is often described as a "transition fuel" — it can replace coal while renewables scale up.

Australia is the world's second-largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG), after Qatar. The North West Shelf project off Western Australia has been operating since 1989 and remains one of the largest LNG facilities in the world. In 2023, Australia exported 81 million tonnes of LNG, earning $90 billion — surpassing coal as Australia's most valuable energy export. The gas is cooled to −162°C, where it becomes liquid and shrinks to 1/600th of its volume, enabling economical transport by specialised tanker ships to Japan, South Korea, and China.

Australian Context
The Scarborough Gas Field: Located off the coast of Western Australia, the Scarborough gas field contains an estimated 7.3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas — enough to power all Australian homes for 15 years. The proposed development would extract this gas, process it on a floating platform, and pipe it to the Pluto LNG plant onshore. Supporters argue it will create 3,000 jobs and generate $50 billion in export revenue. Opponents note that the project would release 1.4 billion tonnes of CO₂ over its lifetime — equivalent to three years of Australia's total emissions. The debate encapsulates Australia's energy dilemma: fossil fuels drive the economy, but they also drive climate change.
3
🛢️ Oil (Petroleum)

The transport fuel that powers a nation

Crude oil is a liquid fossil fuel formed from ancient marine organisms. Like natural gas, it formed under heat and pressure over millions of years. Oil is rarely used for electricity generation in Australia — instead, it dominates transport: cars, trucks, ships, and aircraft.

Refineries process crude oil into useful products through fractional distillation. The different hydrocarbon molecules in crude oil have different boiling points. When heated, they separate into fractions: petrol (C₅–C₁₂, boils at 40–180°C), diesel (C₁₂–C₂₀, boils at 180–370°C), kerosene (jet fuel), and heavy fuel oil for ships. A typical barrel of crude oil (159 litres) yields approximately 72 litres of petrol, 32 litres of diesel, and smaller amounts of other products.

Australia's oil production has declined dramatically. In 2000, Australia produced 85% of its oil needs domestically. By 2023, that figure had fallen to 20%. The Bass Strait fields — which powered Australian transport for 50 years — are now nearly depleted. Today, Australia imports 80% of its oil, mostly from Singapore, Malaysia, and the Middle East. This creates a significant energy security risk: Australia holds only 60 days of oil reserves, well below the International Energy Agency's recommended 90 days.

Comparing Fossil Fuel Emissions

FuelCO₂ per kWhEfficiency (power)Main use in Australia
Coal (black)~0.85 kg33–40%Electricity (46% of grid)
Coal (brown)~1.20 kg25–30%Electricity (Victoria)
Natural gas (CCGT)~0.40 kg50–60%Electricity + industry (16%)
Oil (petrol)~0.25 kg*20–30% (engine)Transport (dominant)
Oil (diesel)~0.27 kg*35–45% (engine)Trucks, mining, trains

* Per kWh of mechanical work at the wheels, not electrical generation. Transport emissions are substantial despite lower per-kWh figures because vehicles are less efficient than power stations.

4
☢️ Nuclear + Environmental Impact

The debate Australia avoids

Nuclear energy generates electricity through nuclear fission: splitting uranium-235 atoms releases enormous heat energy with no direct CO₂ emissions. A single uranium fuel pellet the size of a fingertip contains as much energy as 1 tonne of coal. Nuclear power stations are approximately 33% efficient, similar to coal, but their emissions are negligible during operation.

Australia has the world's largest known uranium reserves — 1.7 million tonnes, about one-third of global resources. The Olympic Dam mine in South Australia is the world's largest uranium deposit. However, Australia has never operated a nuclear power station. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and domestic policy have prevented nuclear power development. The debate resurfaces periodically: proponents argue nuclear could provide reliable, zero-carbon baseload power; opponents cite high costs (nuclear plants cost $10–15 billion each), long construction times (10–15 years), and the challenge of radioactive waste storage.

Fun Fact — Australian Uranium

Australia exports uranium to 11 countries but prohibits its use for domestic power generation. In 2023, Australia exported 4,800 tonnes of uranium oxide — enough to generate the entire electricity needs of the United Kingdom for two years. All of it came from just four mines: Olympic Dam (SA), Ranger (NT, now closed), Four Mile (SA), and Honeymoon (SA). The irony is striking: Australia exports the fuel for carbon-free nuclear power overseas while burning coal at home.

Sports Science Link

The Australian Formula 1 Grand Prix in Melbourne burns approximately 120,000 litres of high-octane petrol over the race weekend. Each F1 car uses about 110 kg of fuel per 305 km race. The energy transformation is remarkable: chemical → thermal → kinetic (pistons) → kinetic (wheels) with an engine efficiency of approximately 50% — far higher than a road car's 25–30%. However, the total carbon footprint of transporting teams, equipment, and 400,000 spectators to Albert Park dwarfs the fuel burned on track. In 2023, Formula 1 committed to using 100% sustainable fuels by 2026, derived from non-food biomass and municipal waste, demonstrating how even motorsport is grappling with fossil fuel dependence.

🎮 Estimate your household's annual CO₂ from electricity

Monthly electricity bill ($) $ / month
Electricity cost per kWh $ / kWh
Grid carbon intensity

Copy Into Your Books

Coal

  • Chemical → Thermal → Kinetic → Electrical
  • ~33-40% efficient (brown coal lower)
  • ~0.85 kg CO₂ per kWh
  • Australia: #1 exporter globally

Natural Gas

  • Chemical → Thermal → Kinetic → Electrical
  • ~50-60% efficient (CCGT)
  • ~0.40 kg CO₂ per kWh
  • Australia: #2 LNG exporter globally

Oil (Petroleum)

  • Chemical → Thermal → Kinetic (transport)
  • ~20-45% efficient (vehicle engines)
  • ~0.25-0.27 kg CO₂ per kWh mechanical
  • Australia imports 80% of oil needs

Nuclear

  • Nuclear → Thermal → Kinetic → Electrical
  • ~33% efficient
  • Near-zero CO₂ during operation
  • Australia: largest uranium reserves, no nuclear power
Identify + Apply

Energy Transformation Chains

For each non-renewable technology, write the complete energy transformation chain. Name the energy form at each stage and the object/substance that has it.

1 A coal-fired power station in the Latrobe Valley, Victoria.

✏️ Answer in your book.

2 A natural gas combined-cycle turbine at a power station in Queensland.

✏️ Answer in your book.

3 A petrol-powered car driving on the Hume Highway between Sydney and Melbourne.

✏️ Answer in your book.
Evaluate + Recommend

The Transition Challenge

The town of Morwell in Victoria's Latrobe Valley has relied on coal for 100 years. The Hazelwood power station closed in 2017, and Loy Yang is scheduled to close by 2047. Using what you have learned about non-renewable and renewable energy sources, recommend an energy transition plan for Morwell. For each source you recommend, explain why it suits this location and describe the energy transformations involved. Consider: existing workforce skills, land availability, transmission infrastructure, and environmental impact.

✏️ Design and justify in your book.
Q
Multiple Choice

Quick-Fire Checks

Select the best answer for each question. Score 5/5 to unlock the game phase.

1. Which energy transformation chain correctly describes electricity generation at a coal-fired power station?

ANuclear → Thermal → Electrical
BChemical → Thermal → Kinetic → Electrical
CChemical → Kinetic → Electrical
DThermal → Chemical → Electrical

2. A natural gas combined-cycle power station is approximately 60% efficient, while a coal power station is approximately 35% efficient. For the same electrical output, how much less CO₂ does the gas station produce per kWh compared to coal?

AThey produce the same CO₂ because both burn fossil fuels
BGas produces about 10% less CO₂
CGas produces about 50% less CO₂ (~0.4 kg/kWh vs ~0.9 kg/kWh)
DGas produces about 80% less CO₂

3. Why is oil (petroleum) rarely used for electricity generation in Australia?

AOil is more valuable for transport fuels, and Australia imports most of its oil
BOil cannot be used to generate electricity
COil power stations are banned in Australia
DOil produces more CO₂ than coal

4. Australia has the world's largest uranium reserves but no nuclear power stations. Which of the following best explains this situation?

AUranium is too expensive to use for power generation
BAustralia lacks the technology to build nuclear reactors
CNuclear power is illegal under international law
DDomestic policy prohibits nuclear power, despite having the largest reserves

5. A family switches from a coal-heavy electricity grid (0.85 kg CO₂/kWh) to a renewable-dominated grid (0.05 kg CO₂/kWh). Their home uses 20 kWh per day. Approximately how much CO₂ do they save per year?

AAbout 500 kg
BAbout 5,800 kg (5.8 tonnes)
CAbout 500 kg per month
DAbout 50 kg
SA
Written Response

Short Answer Questions

Use clear scientific language. Check the model answers after attempting each question.

3 marks

Question 1. A coal power station burns 250 tonnes of black coal per hour to generate 500 MW of electricity. The coal contains 25 MJ of chemical energy per kilogram. Calculate the efficiency of the power station. Show all working and state the efficiency as a percentage.

✏️ Answer in your book.
Hint: Convert 250 tonnes to kilograms first. Calculate total input energy = mass × energy per kg. Calculate output energy = power × time. Efficiency = (output ÷ input) × 100.
4 marks

Question 2. A student claims: "Natural gas is the perfect solution because it produces half the CO₂ of coal and is very efficient. We should build more gas power stations and stop worrying about renewables." Evaluate this claim, providing at least one argument supporting the claim and at least two arguments challenging it. Use specific scientific evidence from this lesson.

✏️ Answer in your book.
Hint: Consider that gas is still a fossil fuel. What about methane leaks? What about the finite supply? Can gas stations run without fuel deliveries? What happens when gas runs out?
5 marks

Question 3. Australia is the world's largest coal exporter and second-largest LNG exporter, earning over $150 billion annually from fossil fuel exports. At the same time, Australia has committed to net-zero emissions by 2050. Explain the tension between Australia's economic dependence on fossil fuel exports and its climate commitments. Your answer should refer to specific energy transformations, efficiency differences between sources, and the concept of finite resources.

✏️ Answer in your book.
Hint: Think about the jobs and revenue from exports versus the emissions. Consider that renewable energy cannot be exported in the same way as coal or LNG (though hydrogen might change this). What happens to export revenue when other countries stop buying fossil fuels?

Model Answers

Q1 (3 marks)
Step 1: Mass of coal = 250 tonnes = 250,000 kg. Energy per kg = 25 MJ. Total chemical energy input per hour = 250,000 × 25 = 6,250,000 MJ = 6.25 × 10⁶ MJ. (1 mark)
Step 2: Power output = 500 MW = 500 MJ/s. Time = 1 hour = 3,600 s. Electrical energy output per hour = 500 × 3,600 = 1,800,000 MJ = 1.8 × 10⁶ MJ. (1 mark)
Step 3: Efficiency = (1,800,000 ÷ 6,250,000) × 100 = 28.8% ≈ 29%. (1 mark)
Marking criteria: (1) Correctly calculates total chemical energy input (6.25 × 10⁶ MJ). (2) Correctly calculates electrical energy output (1.8 × 10⁶ MJ). (3) Correctly calculates and states efficiency (~29%).
Q2 (4 marks)
Supporting argument: Natural gas CCGT is approximately 60% efficient versus coal at 33–40%. Gas produces approximately 0.4 kg CO₂/kWh compared to coal's 0.85 kg CO₂/kWh. This represents a genuine emissions reduction. Gas plants can also start quickly, making them useful backup for intermittent renewables. (1 mark)
Challenge 1: Natural gas is still a fossil fuel. Methane (the main component) is itself a potent greenhouse gas — 80 times more powerful than CO₂ over a 20-year period. Leaks during extraction and transport can offset much of the combustion advantage. The Scarborough gas field alone would release 1.4 billion tonnes of CO₂ equivalent. (1 mark)
Challenge 2: Natural gas reserves are finite. Australia may have 300 years of coal but only 30–50 years of economically recoverable gas at current rates. Building new gas infrastructure locks in fossil fuel dependence for decades, delaying the transition to genuinely sustainable energy. When gas runs out, the infrastructure becomes stranded. (1 mark)
Conclusion: While gas is cleaner than coal, it is not a long-term solution. It may play a transitional role, but investment should prioritise renewables and storage rather than new fossil fuel infrastructure. (1 mark)
Marking criteria: (1) Valid supporting argument with efficiency/CO₂ data. (2) Challenge 1 (methane leaks or finite supply). (3) Challenge 2 (different challenge with evidence). (4) Balanced conclusion recognising transitional role only.
Q3 (5 marks)
Economic dependence: Australia's fossil fuel exports earned over $150 billion in 2023 — coal ($65 billion) and LNG ($90 billion). These exports support 150,000 direct jobs and fund government services. The Bowen Basin, Hunter Valley, and North West Shelf are economic heartlands. Transitioning away threatens regional economies. (1 mark)
Climate commitments: Australia has committed to net-zero by 2050. Coal produces 0.85 kg CO₂/kWh; LNG produces 0.4 kg CO₂/kWh. Australia's domestic emissions are approximately 400 million tonnes annually, with coal responsible for the largest share. Export emissions (when coal/LNG are burned overseas) are not counted in Australia's domestic total but contribute to global climate change. (1 mark)
Energy transformation differences: Coal: chemical → thermal → kinetic → electrical at 33–40% efficiency, with 60–67% waste thermal + CO₂. Gas CCGT: same chain but 50–60% efficient with less CO₂. Renewables (solar/wind): bypass combustion entirely — light/kinetic → electrical directly. This fundamental difference means renewables have near-zero operational emissions regardless of efficiency. (1 mark)
Finite resource challenge: Coal and gas formed over 300 million years from ancient organic matter. Current extraction rates deplete reserves in decades to centuries. Unlike renewable sources (solar, wind) that are naturally replenished, fossil fuels cannot be replaced on human timescales. Australia's economic model relies on selling a finite resource that the world is trying to stop using. (1 mark)
Conclusion: The tension is genuine and complex. Australia's economy depends on exporting fossil fuels, but climate science demands their phase-out. The transition requires new export industries (green hydrogen, critical minerals, renewable technology) and support for affected communities. Delaying transition increases both economic and climate risk. (1 mark)
Marking criteria: (1) Explains economic dependence with specific data. (2) Explains climate commitments with emissions data. (3) Compares energy transformations and efficiency. (4) Explains finite resource challenge. (5) Balanced conclusion recognising complexity.
🎮
Game Phase

Doodle Jump

Take a break and climb as high as you can! Use the arrow keys or tap left/right to move your character.

Game loads inside this page — no external links needed.

📚 Revisit the Content

Want to review any section before moving on?

Energy Mix Coal Natural Gas Oil Nuclear Carbon Calculator
I have completed this lesson
Click to mark as done. Your progress is saved automatically.
← Previous: Renewable Energy Sources