MCQ Answers
1. B — Green hydrogen stores and transports renewable energy for use when needed.
2. A — Tides are predictable because they follow gravitational forces.
3. D — Australia's renewable resources and Asian market proximity create export potential.
4. C — Political popularity is not one of the four scientific evaluation dimensions.
5. B — Geothermal requires hot rock at accessible depths (e.g., Cooper Basin).
SAQ 1 — Hydrogen as Energy Carrier (3 marks)
Marking Criteria: 1 mark — explains why hydrogen is a carrier (not naturally occurring, must be manufactured using energy from another source). 1 mark — one valid advantage over batteries. 1 mark — one valid disadvantage over batteries.
Model answer: Green hydrogen is called an energy carrier rather than an energy source because hydrogen gas (H₂) does not exist in usable quantities in nature. It must be manufactured — typically by using electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen (electrolysis). The energy stored in hydrogen originally came from another source, such as solar or wind. This makes hydrogen a carrier, like a battery or a tank of petrol, rather than a primary source like sunlight or coal.
One advantage of hydrogen over lithium-ion batteries is energy density by mass. Hydrogen contains about 33 kWh per kg, while lithium-ion batteries store about 0.25 kWh per kg. This makes hydrogen far better for applications where weight matters, such as aviation and long-distance shipping. Hydrogen can also be stored indefinitely and transported through pipelines or as liquid, making it suitable for seasonal energy storage.
One disadvantage is round-trip efficiency. The full chain — electrolysis (70%), transport (90%), fuel cell (50%) — results in only about 31.5% of the original electrical energy being recovered. Lithium-ion batteries achieve 85–95% round-trip efficiency. This means hydrogen wastes more than twice as much energy as batteries for the same storage task, making it less efficient for short-term cycling.
SAQ 2 — Hydrogen Chain Efficiency (4 marks)
Marking Criteria: 1 mark — multiplies efficiencies correctly. 1 mark — states final percentage (31.5%). 1 mark — identifies at least two stages where energy is lost. 1 mark — explains the form of lost energy (heat, mechanical).
Model answer: To find the overall efficiency, multiply the efficiency of each stage:
Overall efficiency = 100% × 70% × 90% × 50%
= 1.0 × 0.70 × 0.90 × 0.50
= 0.315 = 31.5%
Only 31.5% of the original solar energy ends up as electricity after the complete hydrogen chain.
The "lost" energy becomes heat at each stage:
• Electrolysis: About 30% of electrical energy becomes heat rather than chemical energy in hydrogen bonds. The electrolyser and surrounding water warm up.
• Compression and shipping: Compressing hydrogen gas requires mechanical work, and some energy is lost as heat in compressors and during cooling to cryogenic temperatures (-253°C) for liquid transport.
• Fuel cell: The chemical reaction converting hydrogen and oxygen back to water is only 50% efficient in converting chemical energy to electricity. The remaining 50% is released as heat warming the fuel cell stack.
SAQ 3 — Evaluating "Solar and Wind Only" (5 marks)
Marking Criteria: 1 mark — presents a clear evaluation stance. 1 mark — uses environmental dimension with evidence. 1 mark — uses economic dimension with evidence. 1 mark — uses social/security dimension with evidence. 1 mark — balanced conclusion acknowledging complexity.
Model answer: The statement "Australia should invest only in solar and wind and ignore all other energy technologies" is an oversimplification that ignores the complexity of energy system design. While solar and wind are essential, a diversified portfolio is necessary for reliability, economic resilience, and global competitiveness.
Environmental: Solar and wind produce near-zero emissions during operation and are environmentally superior to fossil fuels. However, both are intermittent — they do not produce electricity on demand. Relying solely on them would require massive overbuilding or storage, which has its own environmental footprint (lithium mining, land use for pumped hydro reservoirs).
Economic: Solar and wind are now the cheapest sources of new electricity in Australia. However, ignoring hydrogen export would forfeit a potential $100 billion+ industry supplying clean fuel to Japan and Korea. Ignoring geothermal would leave Australia's vast hot-rock resource untapped. Economic diversification reduces exposure to any single technology's cost fluctuations.
Social/Security: A solar-and-wind-only grid could face supply security risks during extended wind lulls or cloudy weeks. The 2021 Texas blackout demonstrated how over-reliance on one source type creates vulnerability. Furthermore, remote mining communities and Indigenous settlements may benefit from small modular nuclear or geothermal where renewable + battery combinations are impractical.
In conclusion, solar and wind should dominate Australia's energy future, but diversification into hydrogen, storage, and potentially geothermal or nuclear creates a more resilient, export-capable, and reliable energy system. The ethical framework demands we evaluate all options rather than committing to a single technology.