💊

Ka, Kb & Gibbs Free Energy

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) has Ka = 3.0 × 10⁻⁴ — a number that tells you exactly why it irritates your stomach lining and why taking it with a full glass of water helps.

Printable worksheet

Download this lesson's worksheet

Use the PDF for classwork, homework or revision. It includes key ideas, activities, questions, an extend task and success-criteria proof.

Think First — Before You Read

📚 Know

  • Ka is Keq for acid dissociation — the same concept with a specific context
  • Strong acids have large Ka; weak acids have small Ka
  • The Kw relationship: Ka × Kb = Kw for conjugate acid-base pairs

🔗 Understand

  • Why aspirin solubility and stomach irritation can be explained using Ka and pH
  • How to rank acid strength using Ka and why pKa is sometimes more convenient
  • The quantitative relationship ΔG° = −RT ln Keq and what it means for spontaneity

✅ Can Do

  • Calculate pH from Ka using the simplifying assumption
  • Rank acids and their conjugate bases by relative strength
  • Apply Ka concepts to explain drug absorption and biological contexts

A pharmacy student reads that hydrochloric acid has Ka >> 1 while acetic acid (vinegar) has Ka = 1.8 × 10⁻⁵. The student says: "Ka must be a different type of constant from Keq — it measures something about acids specifically that Keq can't."

Do you agree? Is Ka a fundamentally different type of constant from Keq, or is it the same concept applied to a specific type of reaction? Write your position with reasoning before reading on.

Module 5 — Key Formulas: Lesson 14

Ka = Keq for: HA(aq) ⇌ H⁺(aq) + A⁻(aq)
Ka = [H⁺][A⁻] / [HA]  — water excluded as solvent
Kb = Keq for: B(aq) + H₂O(l) ⇌ BH⁺(aq) + OH⁻(aq)
Kb = [BH⁺][OH⁻] / [B]  — H₂O excluded as pure liquid solvent
Strong acid: Ka >> 1; Weak acid: Ka << 1; Larger Ka → stronger acid
Ka × Kb = Kw = 1.0 × 10⁻¹⁴ at 25°C  — conjugate pair only
ΔG° = −RT ln Keq  R = 8.314 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹; T in Kelvin
Positive ΔG° → Keq < 1 → reactants favoured; Negative ΔG° → Keq > 1 → products favoured
⚠️ MODULE 5 BOUNDARY: Ka/Kb naming only. No pH calculations, no ICE tables for Ka/Kb, no buffers, no Henderson-Hasselbalch — these are Module 6.

Misconceptions to Fix

Wrong: A negative ΔG means a reaction will happen quickly.

Right: A negative ΔG means a reaction is thermodynamically spontaneous — it can occur without external energy input. It says nothing about reaction rate. Thermodynamic spontaneity and kinetic rate are independent concepts. Some spontaneous reactions are extremely slow at room temperature.

Choose how you work — type your answers below or write in your book.

Key Terms — scan these before reading
Dynamic equilibriumA state where forward and reverse reaction rates are equal.
Le Chatelier's PrincipleA system at equilibrium shifts to minimise applied disturbances.
Equilibrium constant (Keq)The ratio of product to reactant concentrations at equilibrium.
Reaction quotient (Q)The ratio of product to reactant concentrations at any instant.
Closed systemA system where neither matter nor energy can escape to surroundings.
Reversible reactionA reaction that can proceed in both forward and reverse directions.
01

Card 1 — Ka Is Just Keq for an Acid Dissociation — Nothing New

Ka is not a new type of constant — it is Keq with a specific name for a specific category of reaction. Understanding this immediately makes Module 6 acid chemistry far less daunting.

When a weak acid HA dissociates in water: $\text{HA}(aq) \rightleftharpoons \text{H}^+(aq) + \text{A}^-(aq)$

This is a reversible reaction in aqueous solution. The equilibrium expression is written exactly as you have been doing all module:

$$K_a = \frac{[\text{H}^+][\text{A}^-]}{[\text{HA}]}$$

Water is the solvent (pure liquid) — excluded. All other species are aqueous — included. This is mathematically and conceptually identical to any other Keq you have written in L09–L13.

Ka is Keq. Nothing more. The subscript "a" simply tells you this particular Keq applies to an acid dissociation equilibrium.

The same logic applies to Kb (base dissociation constant) for a base B:

$$K_b = \frac{[\text{BH}^+][\text{OH}^-]}{[\text{B}]}$$

Think First Answer: The student was wrong. Ka is NOT a different type of constant — it is Keq applied to the specific equilibrium of an acid dissociation. The only new element is the naming convention. The expression, the rules (exclude solids and pure liquids), and the interpretation (magnitude tells you equilibrium position) are identical to everything in L09.
Common Error: Students write water in the Ka expression: $K_a = [\text{H}^+][\text{A}^-][\text{H}_2\text{O}]/[\text{HA}]$ — wrong. Water is the solvent (pure liquid) and is excluded from all equilibrium expressions, including Ka and Kb, exactly as it is excluded from any other Keq.
Ka AND Kb — THEY ARE JUST Keq Keq [products]^n / [reactants]^m Ka (acid) HA ⇌ H⁺ + A⁻ Ka = [H⁺][A⁻]/[HA] larger Ka = stronger acid strong: Ka >> 1 | weak: Ka << 1 Kb (base) Kb = [BH⁺][OH⁻]/[B] Ksp (solubility) MX(s) ⇌ M⁺ + X⁻ Ksp = [M⁺][X⁻] solid excluded; IQ4 larger Ksp = more soluble Kw (water) Ka × Kb = Kw = 10⁻¹⁴

Ka, Kb, Ksp, and Kw — all are just Keq applied to a specific type of equilibrium

Exam TipWhen explaining equilibrium shifts, always state the direction (left or right) and justify using Le Chatelier's Principle language — simply stating the direction alone will not earn full marks.
02

Card 2 — Strong vs Weak Acids and Bases: Ka and Kb as Discriminators

Ka and Kb are the quantitative tools that distinguish strong acids from weak acids — and the logic is identical to using Keq magnitude to distinguish reactions that go to completion from those that reach a partial equilibrium.

Acid/Base Ka or Kb Classification Dissociation at equilibrium
HCl >> 1 (e.g. 10⁷) Strong acid Essentially complete
Aspirin (HA) 3.0 × 10⁻⁴ Weak acid Partial (~5% at 0.1 mol/L)
Acetic acid (CH₃COOH) 1.8 × 10⁻⁵ Weak acid Partial (~1% at 0.1 mol/L)
NH₃ (ammonia) 1.8 × 10⁻⁵ Weak base Partial
NaOH >> 1 Strong base Essentially complete

Comparing Ka values of weak acids: a larger Ka means more dissociation (stronger weak acid). Aspirin (Ka = 3.0 × 10⁻⁴) is more acidic than acetic acid (Ka = 1.8 × 10⁻⁵) — its equilibrium lies further to the right.

Must Know: A larger Ka means a stronger acid — more dissociation, lower pH for the same concentration. Ranking acids by strength: rank by Ka value, largest Ka = strongest acid. This is the same logic as ranking reactions by Keq magnitude.
Common Error: Confusing Ka with pH or with [H⁺]. Ka is not pH and not the concentration of H⁺ — it is the equilibrium constant for the dissociation. Ka determines how much dissociation occurs; pH depends on both Ka and the concentration of the acid.
Strong vs Weak Acids — Dissociation Comparison STRONG ACID (eg. HCl) HCl(aq) → H⁺(aq) + Cl⁻(aq) Ka >> 1 (essentially complete) ~100% dissociated Ka ~ 10⁷ (HCl) All HA converted to H⁺ + A⁻ No HA remaining at equilibrium Other strong acids: H₂SO₄, HNO₃, HBr, HI, HClO₄ WEAK ACID (eg. CH₃COOH) HA(aq) ⇌ H⁺(aq) + A⁻(aq) Ka << 1 (partial equilibrium) ~1% dissociated (at 0.1 mol/L) Ka = 1.8 × 10⁻⁵ (acetic acid) Most HA stays as HA at equilibrium Large Ka → stronger weak acid Other weak acids: aspirin, HF, H₂CO₃, lactic acid
03

Card 3 — Aspirin: Ka Explains Stomach Irritation

Aspirin's Ka of 3.0 × 10⁻⁴ is not just a number — it is the chemical explanation for one of the most commonly experienced drug side effects, and it has driven decades of pharmaceutical development to find safer analogues.

The Ion Trapping Mechanism

Aspirin equilibrium: $\text{HA}(aq) \rightleftharpoons \text{A}^-(aq) + \text{H}^+(aq)$, Ka = 3.0 × 10⁻⁴.

  1. Stomach (pH ≈ 1–2, high [H⁺]): High [H⁺] is a product of aspirin's dissociation. By LCP, the equilibrium shifts LEFT → aspirin remains mostly in the undissociated neutral form (HA).
  2. Neutral HA is lipid-soluble → can diffuse through the lipid bilayer of stomach lining cells (the cell membrane).
  3. Inside the cell (pH ≈ 7.4, low [H⁺]): Lower [H⁺] means the equilibrium shifts RIGHT → aspirin dissociates inside the cell → H⁺ and A⁻ ions released.
  4. Ion trapping: The charged ionic form (A⁻) cannot escape back through the lipid bilayer → it accumulates inside the cell, irritating the interior.

Ka determines how much dissociation occurs at each pH. A higher Ka would mean more dissociation in the stomach, more neutral form, more entry into cells, more irritation.

Must Know (HSC): The aspirin short answer question will ask you to explain, using Ka as a form of Keq and Le Chatelier's Principle, why aspirin causes stomach irritation. Your answer must include: Ka expression; Ka is Keq for this dissociation; LCP applied to high [H⁺] in stomach; direction of shift; neutral form enters cells; re-dissociation inside cell; ion trapping.
Insight — Enteric Coating: The ion-trapping mechanism applies to many drugs. It explains why many drugs are formulated as enteric-coated tablets — the coating prevents dissolution in the acidic stomach (pH 1–2) and only dissolves in the less acidic small intestine (pH 6–7). The Ka of the drug determines whether enteric coating is necessary.
04

Card 4 — The Kw Relationship: Ka × Kb for Conjugate Pairs

The product of Ka for a weak acid and Kb for its conjugate base is always Kw. This is not a coincidence — it is a direct consequence of equilibrium thermodynamics.

For any conjugate acid-base pair (HA and A⁻): $K_a \times K_b = K_w = 1.0 \times 10^{-14}$ at 25°C.

Why this works (qualitative derivation):

  • Acid dissociation: $K_a = [\text{H}^+][\text{A}^-]/[\text{HA}]$
  • Base dissociation of conjugate: $K_b = [\text{HA}][\text{OH}^-]/[\text{A}^-]$
  • Multiplying: $K_a \times K_b = \frac{[\text{H}^+][\text{A}^-]}{[\text{HA}]} \times \frac{[\text{HA}][\text{OH}^-]}{[\text{A}^-]} = [\text{H}^+][\text{OH}^-] = K_w$

The HA and A⁻ terms cancel exactly. The result is the Kw expression for water autoionisation.

Application: If Ka of a weak acid is known: $K_b = K_w / K_a = 1.0 \times 10^{-14} / K_a$

For aspirin: Ka = 3.0 × 10⁻⁴ → Kb(acetylsalicylate) = 1.0 × 10⁻¹⁴ / 3.0 × 10⁻⁴ = 3.33 × 10⁻¹¹

The conjugate base of aspirin is a very weak base (Kb << 1) — consistent with the rule: stronger acid → weaker conjugate base; weaker acid → stronger conjugate base.

Must Know: Ka × Kb = Kw = 1.0 × 10⁻¹⁴ at 25°C applies to a conjugate pair only — not to any random acid and base. Make sure you identify the conjugate pair correctly before applying this relationship.
Common Error: Applying Ka × Kb = Kw to any acid and any base — not just conjugate pairs. For example, using the Ka of HCl and the Kb of NH₃ together is wrong — they are not a conjugate pair. The relationship only holds for HA and A⁻ (the acid and its conjugate base from the same dissociation equilibrium).
05

Card 5 — ΔG° = −RT ln Keq: Quantitative Introduction

The equation ΔG° = −RT ln Keq is the quantitative version of everything you have known qualitatively since L02 — it converts a number (Keq) into a thermodynamic energy statement (how strongly the reaction favours one direction).

$\Delta G^\circ = -RT \ln K_{eq}$, where R = 8.314 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹ and T is in Kelvin.

Calculation example — Haber process at 298 K (Keq = 977):

$$\Delta G^\circ = -(8.314)(298)\ln(977) = -(2477.6)(6.884) = -17{,}060 \text{ J/mol} = -17.1 \text{ kJ/mol}$$

Negative ΔG° confirms the forward reaction is spontaneous under standard conditions at 25°C — consistent with Keq = 977 >> 1.

Same reaction at 500°C (Keq = 0.013):

$$\Delta G^\circ = -(8.314)(773)\ln(0.013) = -(6427)(-4.343) = +27{,}910 \text{ J/mol} = +27.9 \text{ kJ/mol}$$

Positive ΔG° confirms forward reaction is non-spontaneous under standard conditions at 500°C — consistent with Keq = 0.013 << 1.

Must Know (Calculation Checklist): (1) Always convert T to Kelvin: T(K) = T(°C) + 273. (2) Use R = 8.314 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹ — answer in joules; divide by 1000 to convert to kJ. (3) Check the sign: if Keq > 1, ln Keq > 0, ΔG° is negative; if Keq < 1, ln Keq < 0, ΔG° is positive.
Common Error: Using T = 25 (Celsius) instead of T = 298 (Kelvin) — gives a result approximately 12× too small. Also: ΔG° ≠ ΔG. ΔG = 0 at equilibrium for any system; ΔG° is a fixed property of the reaction at a given temperature and equals zero only when Keq = 1.
Module Boundary Reminder: Ka, Kb, and the Kw relationship are presented here as Keq naming conventions only. Full weak acid pH calculations, ICE tables for Ka/Kb, Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, buffers, and titrations are all Module 6 content — do not apply those methods here.
06

Worked Examples

Example 1 — Writing Ka and Kb Expressions, Interpreting Magnitudes Band 4–5

Write the Ka expression for each of the following and identify the stronger acid. (a) HF(aq) ⇌ H⁺(aq) + F⁻(aq), Ka = 6.8 × 10⁻⁴. (b) HNO₂(aq) ⇌ H⁺(aq) + NO₂⁻(aq), Ka = 4.5 × 10⁻⁴. (c) Write the Kb expression for F⁻ and calculate Kb at 25°C. (d) Is F⁻ a stronger or weaker base than NO₂⁻?

Step 1 — Part (a): Ka for HF

$K_a = [\text{H}^+][\text{F}^-]/[\text{HF}]$. Water excluded (solvent). Powers all 1. Ka = 6.8 × 10⁻⁴.

Step 2 — Part (b): Ka for HNO₂, Compare Strengths

$K_a = [\text{H}^+][\text{NO}_2^-]/[\text{HNO}_2]$. Ka = 4.5 × 10⁻⁴.

Stronger acid: Ka(HF) = 6.8 × 10⁻⁴ > Ka(HNO₂) = 4.5 × 10⁻⁴ → HF is the stronger weak acid — its equilibrium lies further to the right → more H⁺ at equilibrium for the same initial concentration.

Step 3 — Part (c): Kb for F⁻

Conjugate base of HF is F⁻. Base dissociation: $\text{F}^-(aq) + \text{H}_2\text{O}(l) \rightleftharpoons \text{HF}(aq) + \text{OH}^-(aq)$

$K_b = [\text{HF}][\text{OH}^-]/[\text{F}^-]$. Water excluded (pure liquid solvent).

$K_b = K_w/K_a = 1.0 \times 10^{-14} / 6.8 \times 10^{-4} = \mathbf{1.47 \times 10^{-11}}$

Step 4 — Part (d): Compare Kb of F⁻ and NO₂⁻

Kb(NO₂⁻) = Kw/Ka(HNO₂) = 1.0 × 10⁻¹⁴ / 4.5 × 10⁻⁴ = 2.22 × 10⁻¹¹

Kb(NO₂⁻) = 2.22 × 10⁻¹¹ > Kb(F⁻) = 1.47 × 10⁻¹¹ → NO₂⁻ is a stronger base than F⁻. Consistent with: stronger acid (HF) → weaker conjugate base (F⁻); weaker acid (HNO₂) → stronger conjugate base (NO₂⁻).

Answer: (a) Ka = [H⁺][F⁻]/[HF]. (b) Ka = [H⁺][NO₂⁻]/[HNO₂]; HF is stronger (larger Ka). (c) Kb(F⁻) = 1.47 × 10⁻¹¹. (d) NO₂⁻ is stronger base — Kb = 2.22 × 10⁻¹¹ > 1.47 × 10⁻¹¹; weaker acid → stronger conjugate base. ✓

Example 2 — ΔG° = −RT ln Keq Calculation Band 5–6

(a) Calculate ΔG° for $\text{H}_2(g) + \text{I}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\text{HI}(g)$ at 430°C, given Keq = 54.3. (b) Is the forward reaction spontaneous at 430°C? (c) At 25°C, Keq = 794. Calculate ΔG° at 25°C and explain why the result differs from part (a).

Step 1 — Part (a): ΔG° at 430°C

Convert: T = 430 + 273 = 703 K. $\ln(54.3) = 3.994$

$$\Delta G^\circ = -(8.314)(703)(3.994) = -(5844.7)(3.994) = -23{,}343 \text{ J/mol} = \mathbf{-23.3 \text{ kJ/mol}}$$

Step 2 — Part (b): Spontaneity

ΔG° = −23.3 kJ/mol (negative) → forward reaction is spontaneous under standard conditions at 430°C. Consistent with Keq = 54.3 > 1 (products favoured).

Step 3 — Part (c): ΔG° at 25°C

Convert: T = 25 + 273 = 298 K. $\ln(794) = 6.677$

$$\Delta G^\circ = -(8.314)(298)(6.677) = -(2477.6)(6.677) = -16{,}539 \text{ J/mol} = \mathbf{-16.5 \text{ kJ/mol}}$$

At 25°C, ΔG° = −16.5 kJ/mol; at 430°C, ΔG° = −23.3 kJ/mol. Despite Keq being larger at 25°C (794 vs 54.3), the product RT × ln Keq is larger at 430°C because the temperature factor (703 K) is much larger than at 25°C (298 K). ΔG° magnitude reflects both T and ln Keq.

Answer: (a) ΔG° = −23.3 kJ/mol. (b) Spontaneous — ΔG° negative, Keq > 1. (c) ΔG° = −16.5 kJ/mol at 25°C — less negative than at 430°C because the smaller T (298 K vs 703 K) gives a smaller RT × ln Keq product despite the larger Keq value. ✓
Interactive — Ka Expression Builder
Revisit Your Thinking

Ka and Kb are both equilibrium constants — Ka for acid dissociation, Kb for base dissociation. For a conjugate pair, Ka × Kb = Kw (1.0 × 10⁻¹⁴ at 25°C). A large Ka means a strong acid; a small Ka means a weak acid. The relationship to Gibbs free energy is ΔG° = −RT ln K. When K > 1, ΔG° is negative and the forward reaction is spontaneous under standard conditions.

Revisit Your Initial Thinking

Look back at what you wrote in the Think First section. What has changed? What did you get right? What surprised you?

07

Practice Questions

Q1. Which of the following correctly identifies Ka as a form of Keq?

A Ka is different from Keq because it only applies to acids, not equilibrium reactions in general
B Ka is Keq for the specific equilibrium HA(aq) ⇌ H⁺(aq) + A⁻(aq); the expression and rules (exclude water as solvent) are identical to any other Keq
C Ka is the inverse of Keq for acid dissociation — a larger Ka means weaker dissociation
D Ka and Keq use different expressions — Ka excludes all water while Keq excludes only solid water

Q1. Select the option that correctly identifies Ka as a form of Keq?

AKa is different from Keq because it only applies to acids, not equilibrium reactions in general
BKa is Keq for the specific equilibrium HA(aq) ⇌ H⁺(aq) + A⁻(aq); the expression and rules (exclude water as solvent) are identical to any other Keq
CKa is the inverse of Keq for acid dissociation — a larger Ka means weaker dissociation
DKa and Keq use different expressions — Ka excludes all water while Keq excludes only solid water

Q2. The Ka values at 25°C for three weak acids are: HCN Ka = 6.2 × 10⁻¹⁰; HF Ka = 6.8 × 10⁻⁴; HCOOH Ka = 1.8 × 10⁻⁴. Which ranking from strongest to weakest is correct?

A HCN > HCOOH > HF
B HF > HCOOH > HCN
C HCOOH > HF > HCN
D HCN > HF > HCOOH

Q3. For the reaction $\text{A}(g) \rightleftharpoons \text{B}(g) + \text{C}(g)$, Keq = 2.50 × 10⁻³ at 500 K. Which of the following correctly calculates ΔG°?

A ΔG° = −(8.314)(500)(2.50 × 10⁻³) = −10.4 J/mol
B ΔG° = −(8.314)(500) ln(2.50 × 10⁻³) = +24,900 J/mol = +24.9 kJ/mol
C ΔG° = −(8.314)(227) ln(2.50 × 10⁻³) = +13,760 J/mol
D ΔG° = −(8.314)(500)(2.50 × 10⁻³)² = −0.026 J/mol

Q3. For the reaction $\text{A}(g) \rightleftharpoons \text{B}(g) + \text{C}(g)$, Keq = 2.50 × 10⁻³ at 500 K. Select the option that correctly calculates ΔG°?

AΔG° = −(8.314)(500)(2.50 × 10⁻³) = −10.4 J/mol
BΔG° = −(8.314)(500) ln(2.50 × 10⁻³) = +24,900 J/mol = +24.9 kJ/mol
CΔG° = −(8.314)(227) ln(2.50 × 10⁻³) = +13,760 J/mol
DΔG° = −(8.314)(500)(2.50 × 10⁻³)² = −0.026 J/mol

Lesson 14 complete — Ka, Kb & Gibbs Free Energy