Skip to content
HSCScienceModule 1 pilotSources and coverage
Investigating Science · Year 11 · Lesson 9 of 12

Recording and processing observations

How does the collection and presentation of primary data affect the outcome of a scientific investigation?

30–45 min suggested learning

Module 1 pilot only. This learning resource supports the 2017 syllabus and complements your school’s supervised practical program.

Think first and set your goal

Think First

Should you keep only the mean, or can the raw readings tell a different story?

Saved on this device

Learning Intentions

  • Build tables with quantities, units and raw repeats.
  • Calculate means and ranges without hiding variation.
  • Record qualitative notes beside numerical results.

Key Terms

raw data
The original records before calculations or transformations.
mean
The sum of the recorded values divided by their number.
range
Maximum value minus minimum value, describing the spread of a dataset.

Design a table before starting

Design a table before starting

Put the independent-variable values in one column and give each repeated response its own column. State quantities and units in headings. Record the actual precision of the instrument and add a notes column for relevant qualitative observations, such as a collision or an unusual path. Distinguish a missing reading from zero.

A zero-second descent would mean a measured zero, not “we forgot to time it”. Use a clear missing-data code with a reason. Keep the original order or trial IDs so you can check whether equipment drift or practice affected results. A processed summary should be traceable to these raw records.

Book notes: Design a table before starting

Put the independent-variable values in one column and give each repeated response its own column. State quantities and units in headings. Record the actual precision of the instrument and add a notes column for relevant qualitative observations, such as a collision or an unusual path. Distinguish a missing reading from zero.

Saved on this device

Times 1.2, 1.4 and 1.3 s have a mean of:

Calculate a centre and a spread

Calculate a centre and a spread

For descent times of 1.2, 1.4 and 1.3 s, the mean is (1.2 + 1.4 + 1.3)/3 = 1.3 s. The range is 1.4 − 1.2 = 0.2 s. The mean summarises centre; the range gives a simple description of variability in these trials. A mean alone conceals the difference between tightly grouped and widely scattered results.

Use the number of actual valid readings in the denominator. A missing reading must not silently become zero. Do not automatically discard an unusual reading. First inspect the raw notes and method; an exclusion needs an identified reason and a transparent record.

Book notes: Calculate a centre and a spread

For descent times of 1.2, 1.4 and 1.3 s, the mean is (1.2 + 1.4 + 1.3)/3 = 1.3 s. The range is 1.4 − 1.2 = 0.2 s. The mean summarises centre; the range gives a simple description of variability in these trials. A mean alone conceals the difference between tightly grouped and widely scattered results.

Saved on this device

The range of 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8 s is:

Keep representations linked to evidence

Keep representations linked to evidence

A photograph, sketch or video can preserve spatial or behavioural features not captured by a number. Include a scale, date/time and clear label where relevant. A hand-drawn diagram can simplify a view, but the simplification should be acknowledged; a digital image also depends on exposure, framing and processing.

Separate observation notes from inferred explanations. “Spinner contacted desk” records an event; “wing length caused instability” proposes a mechanism. Store processed values alongside, not instead of, the original records, and explain transformations so another person can check them.

Book notes: Keep representations linked to evidence

A photograph, sketch or video can preserve spatial or behavioural features not captured by a number. Include a scale, date/time and clear label where relevant. A hand-drawn diagram can simplify a view, but the simplification should be acknowledged; a digital image also depends on exposure, framing and processing.

Saved on this device

How should a missing timing reading be recorded?

Worked example

Worked example: Summarise the 5 cm wing-length row.

  1. Add the three readings: 1.6 + 1.7 + 1.8 = 5.1 s.
  2. Mean = 5.1/3 = 1.7 s.
  3. Range = 1.8 − 1.6 = 0.2 s.
  4. Keep all three raw readings and the stated fixed-height conditions.

Mean descent time 1.7 s, range 0.2 s across three synthetic trials; this is teaching data, not a class measurement.

Synthetic teaching dataset: paper-spinner descent times over the same fixed height.
Wing length (cm)Trial 1 (s)Trial 2 (s)Trial 3 (s)
31.21.41.3
51.61.71.8
722.22.1

Compare pH readings without confusing the scales

Compare pH readings without confusing the scalesMean recorded pH at 25 °C02468101214Neutral: 7A: 4.0B: 6.0C: 8.0pH is unitless and logarithmic.
Synthetic pH data for three anonymous supplied aqueous samples at 25 °C. These are calculation records only: do not taste, mix or handle unknown liquids.
Text description
  • Sample A has repeated pH readings 4.1, 4.0 and 3.9. Sample B has readings 6.1, 6.0 and 5.9. Sample C has readings 8.1, 8.0 and 7.9. A and B are acidic; C is alkaline under these conditions. The unitless pH scale is logarithmic.

Sample A has repeated pH readings 4.1, 4.0 and 3.9. Sample B has readings 6.1, 6.0 and 5.9. Sample C has readings 8.1, 8.0 and 7.9. A and B are acidic; C is alkaline under these conditions. The unitless pH scale is logarithmic.

Synthetic repeated readings from a pH meter
SampleReading 1 (pH)Reading 2 (pH)Reading 3 (pH)
A4.143.9
B6.165.9
C8.187.9

Calculate the mean recorded pH and range for each sample. Compare acidity and identify what the repetitions cannot establish.

  1. Mean of recorded pH values for A = (4.1 + 4.0 + 3.9) ÷ 3 = 4.0; range = 4.1 − 3.9 = 0.2.
  2. For B, mean recorded pH = 6.0 and range = 0.2; for C, mean = 8.0 and range = 0.2. pH has no unit; these are ranges of readings, not uncertainty bounds for the true value.
  3. At 25 °C, A and B are below neutral pH 7 (acidic), while C is above it (alkaline). A has lower pH than B. A two-pH difference represents a 100-fold hydrogen-ion activity ratio, not “two times as acidic”. For dilute solutions, concentration is often used as an approximation to activity.
  4. A mean of logged pH readings is a descriptive summary; it is not the pH of a mixture or a mean hydrogen-ion concentration. Similar repeated readings do not establish calibration accuracy.

A: mean recorded pH 4.0, range 0.2; B: mean recorded pH 6.0, range 0.2; C: mean recorded pH 8.0, range 0.2. A is more acidic than B; C is alkaline. Check calibration with suitable reference buffers; these data do not establish sample identity, acid strength, safety or a universal property.

Independent practice

Five questions from this lesson’s eight-question bank

Answer the five-question Quick Check. Use the feedback to repair an idea before retrying.

Short answer

Explain and evaluate

Q1. Calculate mean and range for 2.4, 2.6 and 2.5 s.

Saved on this device
Explain and evaluate

Q2. Explain why “mean = 1.7” is an incomplete report.

Saved on this device
Explain and evaluate

Q3. A group replaces a missing value with zero. Explain the consequence.

Saved on this device
Answers and model responses

Activities

Activity 1

3 cm: mean 1.3 s, range 0.2 s. 7 cm: mean 2.1 s, range 0.2 s.

Activity 2

Use wing length (cm), trial time (s) with repeat columns and notes. Use a stated missing-data code, preserve its reason and omit it from the mean denominator; never treat it as zero.

Short Answer Model Answers

Q1: Mean = 7.5/3 = 2.5 s; range = 2.6 − 2.4 = 0.2 s. Include units and retain the raw values.

Q2: It lacks a stated quantity/unit and context. It also omits repeats/spread and conditions, so readers cannot assess what was measured or how variable it was.

Q3: Zero is a measured response, not missing data. Including it depresses the mean and misrepresents the observations. Mark missing data and use actual valid readings with a documented denominator.