Drill 1: $x = 1, 2, \dots, 8$ with $p(x) = \tfrac{1}{8} = 0.125$ for every $x$. The eight probabilities sum to $8 \times \tfrac{1}{8} = 1$ ✓
Drill 2: $n = 20 - 5 + 1 = 16$, so $p(x) = \tfrac{1}{16}$. $P(X > 16)$ counts 17, 18, 19, 20, which is 4 values, giving $\tfrac{4}{16} = \tfrac{1}{4}$.
Drill 3: BANANA has B once, A three times, N twice, over 6 positions. So $p(\text{A}) = \tfrac{3}{6} = \tfrac{1}{2}$, $p(\text{N}) = \tfrac{2}{6} = \tfrac{1}{3}$, $p(\text{B}) = \tfrac{1}{6}$. These are not all equal, so the letter is not uniformly distributed, even though the position was chosen uniformly.
Drill 4: If every positive integer had the same probability $c$, then either $c = 0$ and the total is 0, or $c > 0$ and the total is infinite. Neither can equal 1, so no such distribution exists. This is why the definition insists on finitely many values.
Drill 5: The student is right. Each of the 16 values contributes $\tfrac{1}{16}$, so any three of them together contribute $3 \times \tfrac{1}{16} = \tfrac{3}{16}$. For a uniform variable the probability of an event depends only on how many values it contains, not on which ones.
Q1 (3 marks): (a) $X$ is discrete uniform on $\{1, 2, \dots, 12\}$, so $n = 12$ and $p(x) = \tfrac{1}{12}$ for every $x$ [1]. (b) $P(X \leq 4) = \tfrac{4}{12} = \tfrac{1}{3}$. The multiples of 3 are 3, 6, 9, 12, so $P = \tfrac{4}{12} = \tfrac{1}{3}$ [1]. (c) Conditioning on $X \leq 7$ leaves 7 equally likely values, of which 3 and 6 are multiples of 3, so the answer is $\tfrac{2}{7}$. Conditioning changes both parts of the fraction: the numerator drops from 4 to 2, because 9 and 12 are excluded, and the denominator drops from 12 to 7. Changing only one of them is the standard error — keeping the denominator at 12 gives $\tfrac{2}{12}$, and keeping the numerator at 4 gives $\tfrac{4}{7}$, and both are wrong [1].
Q2 (3 marks): (a) Each die shows one of 4 faces and the two rolls are independent, so there are $4 \times 4 = 16$ equally likely ordered pairs [0.5]. (b) $Y = 1$ only from $(1,1)$: 1 outcome. $Y = 2$ from $(1,2), (2,1), (2,2)$: 3 outcomes. $Y = 3$ from the 5 pairs whose maximum is 3. $Y = 4$ from the 7 pairs whose maximum is 4. So $p(1) = \tfrac{1}{16}$, $p(2) = \tfrac{3}{16}$, $p(3) = \tfrac{5}{16}$, $p(4) = \tfrac{7}{16}$, and these sum to $\tfrac{16}{16} = 1$ ✓ [1.5]. (c) $Y$ is not uniform. Uniformity on 4 values would require every $p(y) = \tfrac{1}{4} = \tfrac{4}{16}$, but the probabilities run from $\tfrac{1}{16}$ to $\tfrac{7}{16}$. The underlying 16 outcomes are equally likely; the maximum is not, because larger values are produced by more of them [1].
Q3 (3 marks): (a) The student is describing the slip drawn. The variable that actually matters to the question of fairness is the student who wins [0.5]. (b) The slip drawn is uniform: every slip is physically identical and equally likely to be selected. The winning student is not uniform: a Year 11 or 12 student holds two of the slips and so is twice as likely to win as a student from any other year [1.5]. (c) Mathematically, a "fair" draw would mean the winning student is uniformly distributed over all students, and it is not. But the design is not an error, it is a deliberate weighting in favour of senior students, and whether that is fair in the everyday sense is a question about the school's intention rather than about the mathematics. The precise statement is: the draw is uniform over slips and non-uniform over students [1].