Calculate KE, GPE, and total energy in bound orbits
Derive and use escape velocity
Explain the significance of negative total energy
CONCEPTUAL — A satellite in orbit has kinetic energy. Is its total energy positive, negative, or zero? What does this tell you about whether it can escape?
Calculate kinetic energy, gravitational potential energy, and total energy in bound orbits. Derive escape velocity using energy conservation.
From our derivation of orbital velocity $v = \sqrt{GM/r}$, we can find the kinetic energy of a satellite in circular orbit. The satellite mass $m$ cancels in the orbital velocity formula, but it remains in the energy expression.
Energy In Orbits
Since $KE \propto 1/r$, a satellite at a higher altitude (larger $r$) has less kinetic energy than one in a lower orbit. This may seem counterintuitive at first, but remember: orbital speed decreases with altitude, and this decrease in $v^2$ outweighs any constant mass term.
Gravitational potential energy in orbital mechanics is defined with a specific convention: zero at infinite separation. This means all finite orbits have negative potential energy.
The negative sign is essential. It reflects the fact that gravity is an attractive force. To move a satellite from distance $r$ to infinity, you must do positive work on it — increasing its potential energy from a negative value up to zero.
More negative = lower energy = closer to the central mass. A satellite at $r = 7.0 \times 10^6 \text{ m}$ has a more negative U than one at $r = 10.0 \times 10^6 \text{ m}$. The satellite closer to Earth is deeper in the gravitational well.
The total mechanical energy of an orbiting satellite is the sum of its kinetic and gravitational potential energies. For a circular orbit, this sum simplifies to an elegant result.
The total energy is always negative for any bound orbit. This is the defining characteristic of a gravitationally bound system: the satellite does not have enough energy to escape to infinity.
Escape velocity is the minimum initial speed needed for an object to travel from a given point to infinity, with just enough kinetic energy to overcome gravitational binding. At infinity, both the velocity and potential energy approach zero.
Notice that the mass of the escaping object $m$ cancels out — escape velocity depends only on the central body's mass and the starting distance from its centre. A spacecraft and a single proton launched from the same point need the same initial speed to escape (ignoring atmospheric drag).
For Earth, at the surface ($r = R_E = 6.37 \times 10^6 \text{ m}$):
$U = -GMm/r$ is negative everywhere at finite distance from a mass. Zero potential energy is defined at infinity only. A satellite in orbit is deep in a gravitational well — its potential energy is significantly negative.
$v_e = \sqrt{2GM/r}$ — the projectile mass $m$ cancels in the derivation. A feather and a rocket require the same initial speed to escape from the same point (neglecting atmospheric drag).
Once escape velocity is reached, no further energy input is needed. The object will coast to infinity, slowing down asymptotically toward zero speed (in the absence of other masses and atmosphere). Escape velocity is the initial speed required at the starting point — not a speed that must be maintained.
Voyager 1 escaped the solar system using gravity assists (slingshot manoeuvres) from Jupiter and Saturn. These increased its speed without burning fuel by transferring orbital energy from the planets to the spacecraft. The planets lost an infinitesimal amount of orbital energy; the spacecraft gained a transformative boost.
The Oberth effect explains why burning engines at periapsis (closest approach) is most fuel-efficient: because orbital speed is highest at the closest point, the same $\Delta v$ produces the greatest change in kinetic energy. The relationship $\Delta E = \frac{1}{2}m(v + \Delta v)^2 - \frac{1}{2}mv^2$ shows that for a given $\Delta v$, the energy gain is maximised when $v$ is already large. This is why spacecraft fire their engines at closest approach during flybys.
Q1. Find the KE, U, and $E_{\text{total}}$ for a 1000 kg satellite orbiting at $r = 10{,}000 \text{ km}$ from Earth's centre. ($G = 6.67 \times 10^{-11} \text{ N m}^2\text{/kg}^2$, $M_E = 5.97 \times 10^{24} \text{ kg}$)
[3 marks]
Q2. Calculate the escape velocity from the Moon's surface. ($M_M = 7.35 \times 10^{22} \text{ kg}$, $R_M = 1.74 \times 10^6 \text{ m}$)
[2 marks]
Q3. A satellite in low Earth orbit has $E_{\text{total}} = -4.5 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}$. How much energy must be supplied to move it to geostationary orbit, where its total energy is $-1.2 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}$?
[2 marks]
$$KE = \frac{1}{2}\frac{GMm}{r}$$
Derived from $v = \sqrt{GM/r}$. Always positive. Decreases as $r$ increases.
$$U = -\frac{GMm}{r}$$
Always negative for finite $r$. Zero at infinity.
$$E_{\text{total}} = -\frac{1}{2}\frac{GMm}{r}$$
Always negative. Binding energy = $|E_{\text{total}}|$.
$$v_e = \sqrt{\frac{2GM}{r}}$$
Factor of 2 is mandatory. $v_e = \sqrt{2} \times v_{\text{orbital}}$ at same $r$. Independent of projectile mass.
Now that you have learned the energy equations, revisit your initial answer. For a bound satellite: $E_{\text{total}} = -\frac{1}{2}GMm/r$, which is always negative. This negative total energy is what keeps the satellite bound — it does not have enough energy to reach infinity (where $E = 0$). The more negative the total energy, the more tightly bound the satellite is. Only if $E_{\text{total}} \geq 0$ could the satellite escape.
1. The total energy of a bound orbit is:
2. Escape velocity at distance $r$ from a mass $M$ is:
3. Compared to orbital velocity at the same radius, escape velocity is:
4. Gravitational potential energy is defined as zero at:
5. Doubling the orbital radius of a satellite:
Q1. An 800 kg satellite orbits Earth at an altitude of 500 km. Calculate its kinetic energy, gravitational potential energy, and total energy.
($G = 6.67 \times 10^{-11} \text{ N m}^2\text{/kg}^2$, $M_E = 5.97 \times 10^{24} \text{ kg}$, $R_E = 6.37 \times 10^6 \text{ m}$)
[3 marks] Apply Band 4-5Q2. Calculate the escape velocity from the surface of Earth. Show algebraically why this result is independent of the mass of the projectile.
[3 marks] Apply Band 5-6Q3. Evaluate the statement: "A satellite with total energy $E = -3 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}$ is more tightly bound than one with $E = -1 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}$." Explain what "more tightly bound" means physically and calculate the energy required to move each satellite to infinity.
[4 marks] Evaluate Band 6Q1. Satellite at 500 km altitude — 3 marks
Step 1 — Find orbital radius (centre-to-centre):
$$r = R_E + h = 6.37 \times 10^6 \text{ m} + 5.00 \times 10^5 \text{ m} = 6.87 \times 10^6 \text{ m}$$
Step 2 — Calculate kinetic energy:
$$KE = \frac{1}{2}\frac{GMm}{r} = \frac{1}{2} \times \frac{6.67 \times 10^{-11} \text{ N m}^2\text{/kg}^2 \times 5.97 \times 10^{24} \text{ kg} \times 800 \text{ kg}}{6.87 \times 10^6 \text{ m}}$$
$$KE = 2.32 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}$$
Step 3 — Calculate gravitational potential energy:
$$U = -\frac{GMm}{r} = -\frac{6.67 \times 10^{-11} \text{ N m}^2\text{/kg}^2 \times 5.97 \times 10^{24} \text{ kg} \times 800 \text{ kg}}{6.87 \times 10^6 \text{ m}}$$
$$U = -4.64 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}$$
Step 4 — Calculate total energy:
$$E_{\text{total}} = KE + U = 2.32 \times 10^{10} \text{ J} + (-4.64 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}) = -2.32 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}$$
Award 1 mark for correct radius with centre-to-centre, 1 mark for correct KE and U, 1 mark for correct total energy.
Q2. Escape velocity from Earth — 3 marks
Step 1 — Set total energy to zero at escape threshold:
$$\frac{1}{2}mv_e^2 - \frac{GM_E m}{R_E} = 0$$
Step 2 — Solve for $v_e$:
$$\frac{1}{2}mv_e^2 = \frac{GM_E m}{R_E}$$
$$v_e^2 = \frac{2GM_E}{R_E}$$
Step 3 — The projectile mass $m$ cancels:
$$v_e = \sqrt{\frac{2GM_E}{R_E}} = \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 6.67 \times 10^{-11} \text{ N m}^2\text{/kg}^2 \times 5.97 \times 10^{24} \text{ kg}}{6.37 \times 10^6 \text{ m}}}$$
$$v_e = \sqrt{1.25 \times 10^8 \text{ m}^2\text{/s}^2} = 1.12 \times 10^4 \text{ m/s} = 11.2 \text{ km/s}$$
Independence from projectile mass: The mass $m$ appears on both sides of the energy equation and cancels out completely. Therefore, $v_e$ depends only on the central body's mass $M_E$ and the starting radius $R_E$, not on what is being launched. A spacecraft and a marble require the same initial speed to escape from Earth's surface (neglecting atmospheric effects).
Award 1 mark for correct derivation with factor of 2, 1 mark for correct numerical answer, 1 mark for showing mass cancellation.
Q3. Evaluate "more tightly bound" — 4 marks
The statement is TRUE.
From $E_{\text{total}} = -\frac{1}{2}GMm/r$, a more negative total energy means a smaller orbital radius $r$ — the satellite is closer to the central body.
"More tightly bound" means:
Energy to move to infinity (binding energy):
For $E_1 = -3 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}$: escape energy = $|E_1| = 3 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}$
For $E_2 = -1 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}$: escape energy = $|E_2| = 1 \times 10^{10} \text{ J}$
The first satellite requires three times as much energy to free it from Earth's gravity. This confirms it is more tightly bound — it is deeper in the gravitational well and harder to dislodge.
Award 1 mark for correct evaluation of the statement, 1 mark for explaining "more tightly bound," 1 mark for correct escape energies, 1 mark for comparative reasoning.
🎯 Energy in Orbits Boss Battle
Test your orbital energy and escape velocity calculation skills under pressure!
Game iframe will be embedded here.
Boss Battle: Energy in Orbits