Every living thing needs energy. But energy does not appear from nowhere — it travels through ecosystems in predictable patterns. This lesson explains how food chains, food webs and energy pyramids show where energy goes and why most of it never reaches the top.
Use the PDF for classwork, homework or revision. It includes key ideas, activities, questions, an extend task and success-criteria proof.
Many students think energy comes from the animal that was eaten, but that is only part of the story. Write your best chain of sources before reading on.
Think about how much food a lion needs compared to how much grass grows. This prepares you for the energy pyramid later in the lesson.
A food chain is a simple way to trace energy from its source through an ecosystem by following who eats whom.
A food chain always starts with a producer, usually a plant or algae, because producers capture energy from sunlight. The next organism is a primary consumer that eats the producer. The next is a secondary consumer that eats the primary consumer. The chain can keep going with tertiary consumers at the top.
The arrow in a food chain points from the organism that is eaten to the organism that eats it. This shows the direction of energy flow. For example, in grass → grasshopper → lizard → hawk, the arrow points from grass to grasshopper because energy moves from the grass into the grasshopper when it is eaten.
Real ecosystems are more complex than a single food chain. A food web shows the many feeding relationships that exist in the same place.
A grasshopper does not only eat grass. It might eat leaves from several plants. A lizard does not only eat grasshoppers. It might also eat caterpillars or spiders. A hawk might eat lizards, small birds or mice. When you draw all these connections together, you get a food web.
Food webs are more useful than food chains because they show what happens when one species changes. If a drought kills off the grasshoppers, a lizard that also eats caterpillars might survive. In a simple food chain, the lizard would have no other food source and would die out. Food webs show that ecosystems have some backup connections.
Energy does not cycle through a food chain. It flows in one direction, and most of it is lost before it reaches the next level.
When a grasshopper eats grass, it does not turn all the grass into grasshopper body mass. Some energy is used for movement, some is lost as heat, and some passes out as waste. On average, only about 10 percent of the energy from one level transfers to the next. This means producers must capture a huge amount of energy to support just a few top predators.
An energy pyramid shows this visually. The bottom level is wide because producers capture the most energy. Each level above is narrower because less energy is available. This is why there is more grass than grasshoppers, more grasshoppers than lizards, and more lizards than hawks.
Wrong: "Energy is recycled in a food chain."
Right: Energy flows through an ecosystem and is lost as heat at each level. Matter is recycled, but energy is not.
Wrong: "The arrow points from predator to prey."
Right: The arrow shows energy flow from prey to predator. It points to the organism that receives the energy.
Right: Producers are at the bottom of the energy pyramid. Top predators are at the top because they receive the least energy.
Right: Only about 10 percent of energy transfers to the next level. The rest is lost as heat, movement and waste.
Stacked pyramid showing energy levels from producers at the wide base to top predators at the narrow peak, with approximate percentages labelled at each level.
Show who eats whom. Arrows point from prey to predator, showing energy flow.
Networks of connected food chains. More realistic than a single chain.
Show energy loss at each level. Only about 10 percent transfers to the next level.
Drawing arrows the wrong way. Remember: arrow points to who gets the energy.
Use the organisms below to build a simple Australian food web. Draw arrows showing energy flow and label each organism with its trophic level.
Organisms: grass, grasshopper, lizard, hawk, caterpillar, magpie, nectar, bee
A student says: "If there are more kangaroos, there will automatically be more dingoes." Use the Claim-Evidence-Reasoning frame below to evaluate this claim.
Claim: State whether the student is correct or incorrect.
Evidence: Use facts from the lesson about food webs and energy flow.
Reasoning: Explain how the evidence supports your claim.
1. In a food chain, what does the arrow represent?
2. Which organism is always at the first trophic level?
3. Why is a food web a better model than a single food chain?
4. According to the energy pyramid, why are there fewer hawks than grasshoppers in an ecosystem?
5. If a disease wiped out all the lizards in a food web, what would be the most likely immediate effect?
Explain the difference between a food chain and a food web. 1 mark for defining a food chain, 1 mark for defining a food web, 1 mark for explaining why a food web is more realistic.
Use the terms producer, primary consumer, energy pyramid and trophic level to explain why a paddock can support many sheep but only a few wedge-tailed eagles. 1 mark for each term used correctly, 1 mark for logical explanation of energy loss.
A farmer sprays insecticide that kills most of the grasshoppers in a paddock. Explain three ways this could affect the food web, using at least two key terms from the lesson. 1 mark for each effect explained, 2 marks for using key terms correctly, 1 mark for linking the effects to the whole ecosystem.
Look back at what you wrote in the Think First section. Can you now trace the energy in a kangaroo's muscles all the way back to the sun? Can you explain why ecosystems need more grass than lions using the energy pyramid?
1: B. The arrow shows the direction of energy flow from the organism that is eaten to the organism that eats it.
2: C. Producers are always at the first trophic level because they capture energy from sunlight and make their own food.
3: A. A food web is better because most organisms eat more than one type of food, so a single chain is too simple.
4: D. Only a small fraction of energy reaches the top predator level because most energy is lost as heat, movement and waste at each trophic level.
5: B. If lizards are removed, grasshoppers would increase because one of their main predators has been removed. This is a direct effect on the food web.
Sample answer: A food chain is a simple model showing one path of energy from producer to top predator (1 mark). A food web is a network of many interconnected food chains (1 mark). A food web is more realistic because most organisms eat more than one type of food and are eaten by more than one predator (1 mark).
Sample answer: Grass in the paddock is the producer at the first trophic level (1 mark). Sheep are primary consumers that eat the grass (1 mark). The energy pyramid shows that only about 10 percent of energy transfers to the next level (1 mark). This means there is much less energy available for wedge-tailed eagles at a higher trophic level, so only a few can be supported (1 mark).
Sample answer: Lizards that eat grasshoppers would have less food, so their population might decrease (1 mark). Plants that grasshoppers eat might increase because fewer grasshoppers are eating them (1 mark). Hawks or other predators that eat lizards might also be affected because their food source is reduced (1 mark). Key terms used: food web and trophic level (2 marks).
Energy flows through ecosystems in one direction, from producers through consumers.
Food webs show realistic feeding relationships. Energy pyramids show that only about 10 percent of energy transfers between levels.
Understanding energy flow helps explain why top predators are rare and why disrupting one species can affect many others.
Future lessons will explore how human activities change ecosystems and what happens when food webs are disrupted.
Leap through questions on food chains, food webs, trophic levels and energy pyramids. Follow the energy flow!