Practise this lesson
Four printable worksheets that build from the foundations up to exam-style questions, start at whatever level suits you.
Brazil vs. Germany: Two Factories, One Molecule
In 2023, Brazil produced approximately 35 billion litres of ethanol from sugar cane, almost entirely by fermentation. At the same time, chemical plants in Europe and Asia produced ethanol from ethene and steam over a phosphoric acid catalyst in high-pressure reactors. Both processes make identical molecules of CH₃CH₂OH. The Brazilian factory runs at 35°C with yeast in giant vats. The European plant runs at 300°C and 65 atmospheres of pressure with stainless steel vessels.
Before you read on, write down: Which method do you think produces higher-purity ethanol? Which costs more to run? Which is more sustainable? You will return to evaluate each prediction at the end of the lesson.
Know
- Three methods to produce alcohols: alkene hydration, haloalkane substitution, fermentation
- Conditions for each: catalyst, temperature, pressure, solvent, atmosphere
- Balanced equations with correct arrow notation (⇌ for hydration, → for substitution and fermentation)
Understand
- Why alkene hydration uses ⇌, reversible equilibrium, Le Chatelier's principle applies
- Why 300°C is a rate-yield compromise for alkene hydration
- Why fermentation requires anaerobic conditions and is limited to ~15% ethanol
- How aqueous vs. alcoholic NaOH determines substitution vs. elimination
Can Do
- Write and balance equations for all three methods with conditions
- Apply Le Chatelier's principle to explain pressure and temperature effects on hydration yield
- Evaluate and compare the three methods using rate, purity, cost, and sustainability criteria
Alkene Hydration, Industrial Context & Equilibrium
You met alkene hydration in L06 as a reaction type, now you examine it as an industrial process, which means thinking about equilibrium, yield, scale, and the economic context that determines whether this reaction is worth running at all.
The hydration of ethene to produce ethanol is one of the most important industrial organic reactions in the world:
CH₂=CH₂ + H₂O ⇌ CH₃CH₂OH
The reaction is reversible written with ⇌, not →. At equilibrium, both the forward reaction (hydration → ethanol) and the reverse reaction (dehydration → ethene + steam) occur simultaneously.
Conditions Chosen to Maximise Yield, Le Chatelier's Principle
HIGH PRESSURE (~65 atm): The left side has 2 moles of gas (ethene + steam); the right side has effectively 0 moles of gas (ethanol condenses as liquid). Increasing pressure shifts equilibrium to the side with fewer gas moles, the right side, increasing ethanol yield.
TEMPERATURE (~300°C): The forward reaction is exothermic. Lower temperature would favour the forward direction and increase yield. However, lower temperature also means slower rate and lower throughput. 300°C is a rate-vs-yield compromise not optimal for yield, but acceptable for rate. (Same trade-off as the Haber process for ammonia.)
H₃PO₄ CATALYST: Speeds up attainment of equilibrium without shifting the equilibrium position. More ethanol is produced faster per unit time.
RECYCLE LOOP: Single-pass conversion is only ~5%, most ethene does not react in one pass. Unreacted ethene is separated from the product stream, recycled, and passed through again. This continuous recycling achieves high overall yield despite low single-pass conversion.
Conditions, Alkene Hydration (Industrial Ethanol)
- Reagent
- H₂O (steam)
- Catalyst
- H₃PO₄ (absorbed on silica support, heterogeneous)
- Temperature
- ~300°C (rate-yield compromise)
- Pressure
- ~65 atm (high pressure, shifts equilibrium right)
- Arrow
- ⇌ (reversible equilibrium)
Substitution of Haloalkanes, Making Alcohols from Halides
Haloalkanes are the most versatile building blocks in organic synthesis, and one of their most important transformations is nucleophilic substitution with hydroxide ion, which converts a C–X bond directly into a C–OH bond without needing a double bond at all.
When a haloalkane is heated with aqueous NaOH or KOH, the halogen is replaced by a hydroxyl group. This is nucleophilic substitution OH⁻ acts as a nucleophile and replaces the halogen (which leaves as halide X⁻).
R–X + NaOH(aq) → R–OH + NaX
Worked Equations
| Haloalkane | Equation | Product |
|---|---|---|
| bromoethane | CH₃CH₂Br + NaOH(aq) → CH₃CH₂OH + NaBr | ethanol |
| 2-bromopropane | CH₃CHBrCH₃ + NaOH(aq) → CH₃CHOHCH₃ + NaBr | propan-2-ol |
| 2-bromo-2-methylpropane | (CH₃)₃CBr + NaOH(aq) → (CH₃)₃COH + NaBr | 2-methylpropan-2-ol |
Key Features
(1) Aqueous NaOH: The hydroxide must be aqueous (dissolved in water) to give substitution. If NaOH is in ethanol (alcoholic NaOH), elimination occurs instead, producing an alkene.
(2) Reflux: Heating increases rate. Reflux prevents volatile haloalkane and alcohol vapours from escaping, condensed vapours drip back into the flask, keeping reactants in contact and improving yield.
(3) Halide leaving group reactivity: R–I (fastest) > R–Br > R–Cl (slowest). C–I bonds are weakest and most easily broken; C–Cl bonds are strongest.
Conditions, Haloalkane Substitution to Alcohol
- Reagent
- NaOH(aq) or KOH(aq), aqueous hydroxide (NOT alcoholic)
- Catalyst
- None
- Conditions
- Heat under reflux
- Equipment
- Round-bottom flask, reflux condenser, heating mantle
- Arrow
- → (goes essentially to completion)
Reflux apparatus for haloalkane substitution, condenser returns volatile reactants to the flask, preventing loss and improving yield
Fermentation, Biological Production of Ethanol
Fermentation is the oldest chemical process humans have used deliberately, and it works because yeast cells contain an enzyme (zymase) that catalyses the conversion of glucose to ethanol under conditions impossible to replicate in an industrial pressure reactor.
Fermentation is the biological conversion of glucose to ethanol and carbon dioxide, catalysed by the enzyme zymase found in yeast cells:
C₆H₁₂O₆ → 2C₂H₅OH + 2CO₂
6C + 12H + 6O → (4C + 12H + 2O) + (2C + 4O) = 6C + 12H + 6O ✓
All Three Conditions Required
Maximum ethanol concentration: ~15%. When ethanol reaches ~15%, it becomes toxic to yeast cells and fermentation stops, regardless of remaining glucose. Spirits (40%) require fractional distillation of the fermented liquid.
Feedstock: Any sugar or starch, sugar cane, sugar beet, corn, wheat, barley, cassava. Starch must first be hydrolysed to glucose by amylase enzymes before zymase can act.
Conditions, Fermentation
- Reagent
- Glucose solution (C₆H₁₂O₆ in water)
- Catalyst
- Yeast (enzyme zymase, biological catalyst)
- Temperature
- ~35°C (enzyme optimum)
- Atmosphere
- Anaerobic (no oxygen / air excluded)
- Equipment
- Sealed fermentation vessel (vented to release CO₂)
- Arrow
- → (goes essentially to completion, stops at ~15% ethanol)
Fermentation equation, C₆H₁₂O₆ → 2C₂H₅OH + 2CO₂ · carbon balance: 6C glucose splits into 4C (ethanol) + 2C (CO₂)
Comparing the Three Methods, Feedstock, Yield & Sustainability
Choosing between hydration, haloalkane substitution, and fermentation is not a chemistry question, it is an engineering, economic, and environmental question that chemistry informs but does not answer alone.
| Feature | Hydration (alkene + H₂O) | Haloalkane substitution | Fermentation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting material | Ethene (crude oil) | Haloalkane (from alkane halogenation) | Glucose (plant biomass) |
| Catalyst | H₃PO₄ (heterogeneous) | None | Yeast (zymase enzyme) |
| Temperature | ~300°C (high) | Reflux (~80–100°C) | ~35°C (very low) |
| Pressure | ~65 atm (high) | Atmospheric | Atmospheric |
| Reaction type | Addition (⇌ equilibrium) | Nucleophilic substitution (→) | Biological (→) |
| Ethanol purity | High (~95%) | Variable, must purify | Low (~15%, must distil) |
| Rate | Fast (continuous) | Moderate | Slow (batch, days–weeks) |
| Renewable feedstock? | No (fossil fuel) | No (fossil fuel) | Yes (plant biomass) |
| Carbon footprint | High | High | Lower (near-carbon-neutral) |
| Scale | Very large industrial | Lab to small industrial | Small to very large |
| Second organic product | None | NaX salt (waste stream) | CO₂ (useful, carbonation, bread) |
HSC Comparison Key Points
Rate: hydration > substitution > fermentation. Hydration is continuous industrial; fermentation is slow batch.
Purity: hydration gives highest purity; fermentation gives lowest (15%, must distil to get concentrated product).
Sustainability: fermentation wins on renewable feedstock, plant biomass grown using solar energy; net CO₂ near zero for the growth phase. Hydration and substitution both depend on fossil fuel feedstocks.
Energy: fermentation at 35°C = low energy input. Hydration at 300°C + 65 atm = very high energy and infrastructure cost.
Common Misconceptions, Alcohol Production
"Higher temperature increases ethanol yield in alkene hydration." Wrong, the forward reaction is exothermic. Higher temperature favours the reverse (endothermic) reaction by Le Chatelier, DECREASING yield. 300°C is chosen for rate, not yield.
"Fermentation is always more sustainable than hydration." Oversimplified, distillation of low-purity fermented ethanol consumes significant energy, and large-scale fermentation requires land clearing, irrigation, and may compete with food crops. Context matters.
"NaOH always gives substitution with haloalkanes." Only aqueous NaOH gives substitution (→ alcohol). Alcoholic NaOH gives elimination (→ alkene). The solvent determines the product.
"Fermentation equation: C₆H₁₂O₆ → C₂H₅OH + CO₂ (no coefficients)." Unbalanced, must be C₆H₁₂O₆ → 2 C₂H₅OH + 2 CO₂. Missing coefficients always lose marks.
Writing Balanced Equations for All Three Production Methods
Equation: CH₂=CH₂ + H₂O ⇌ CH₃CH₂OH
Note: reversible arrow (⇌), this is an equilibrium reaction.
Conditions: H₂O (steam), H₃PO₄ catalyst, ~300°C, ~65 atm.
Equation: CH₃CH₂Br + NaOH(aq) → CH₃CH₂OH + NaBr
Note: single arrow (→), substitution goes essentially to completion.
Conditions: NaOH(aq) [aqueous], heat under reflux.
Equation: C₆H₁₂O₆ → 2C₂H₅OH + 2CO₂
Balance check: Left, 6C, 12H, 6O. Right, 4C+12H+2O + 2C+4O = 6C, 12H, 6O ✓
Conditions: yeast (zymase enzyme), ~35°C, anaerobic (no oxygen).
(a) CH₂=CH₂ + H₂O ⇌ CH₃CH₂OH [H₃PO₄, ~300°C, ~65 atm]
(b) CH₃CH₂Br + NaOH(aq) → CH₃CH₂OH + NaBr [aqueous NaOH, reflux]
(c) C₆H₁₂O₆ → 2C₂H₅OH + 2CO₂ [yeast/zymase, ~35°C, anaerobic]
Explaining Equilibrium Considerations in Alkene Hydration
Equation: CH₂=CH₂ + H₂O ⇌ CH₃CH₂OH
Left side: 2 moles of gas (ethene + steam). Right side: 0 moles of gas (ethanol condenses as liquid).
By Le Chatelier's Principle: increasing pressure shifts equilibrium to the side with fewer moles of gas, the right side (products). ∴ High pressure increases ethanol yield.
The forward reaction is exothermic. By Le Chatelier, DECREASING temperature favours the exothermic direction → shifts equilibrium right → increases ethanol yield.
However, lower temperature also means slower reaction rate and lower throughput.
300°C gives a rate fast enough for continuous industrial production while still achieving an acceptable (if not maximum) equilibrium yield. This is a kinetics-vs-thermodynamics compromise, analogous to the Haber process.
After each pass through the reactor, the exit stream contains mostly unreacted ethene + small amounts of ethanol. The ethanol is condensed and separated. Unreacted ethene is recycled, pumped back to the reactor inlet and passed through again.
This continuous recycling achieves high overall yield despite only ~5% conversion per pass. Almost all ethene is eventually converted across multiple passes.
(a) High pressure (65 atm) favours the side with fewer gas moles (right side), Le Chatelier, increasing ethanol yield.
(b) Lower temperature would increase yield (exothermic forward reaction) but would slow the rate unacceptably. 300°C is a kinetics-thermodynamics compromise.
(c) Unreacted ethene is separated from the product stream and recycled to the reactor inlet, continuous recycling achieves high overall yield despite low single-pass conversion.
Evaluating Production Methods, Brazil vs. Germany (7 marks)
Fermentation: C₆H₁₂O₆ → 2C₂H₅OH + 2CO₂ · yeast (zymase), ~35°C, anaerobic.
Hydration: CH₂=CH₂ + H₂O ⇌ CH₃CH₂OH · H₂O (steam), H₃PO₄, ~300°C, ~65 atm.
Brazil has abundant agricultural land for sugar cane, a renewable, photosynthetically produced glucose source. Fermentation requires no high-pressure infrastructure, operates at 35°C (low energy input), and is near-carbon-neutral (CO₂ released during fermentation is offset by CO₂ absorbed during sugar cane growth). The resulting ethanol is used as car fuel, reducing fossil fuel import dependence. Brazil's warm climate enables continuous sugar cane cultivation year-round.
Germany has sophisticated petrochemical infrastructure, ethene is available from oil refinery cracking. Catalytic hydration produces high-purity ethanol (~95%) continuously at large scale, suitable for industrial solvents, pharmaceutical manufacturing, and chemical synthesis where strict purity is required. The process has far higher throughput than fermentation. Fermentation's slow rate and low purity (requiring energy-intensive distillation) make it less competitive for high-volume industrial applications in a high-wage economy with existing large-scale infrastructure.
Arguments FOR (fermentation more sustainable): renewable feedstock; lower energy requirement (35°C vs 300°C + 65 atm); near-carbon-neutral when plant growth is accounted for; no fossil fuel dependence.
Arguments AGAINST (claim is oversimplified): fermentation produces only ~15% ethanol, purification to industrial grade requires fractional distillation consuming significant energy. Large-scale fermentation requires clearing land for biomass crops, potentially involving deforestation, habitat loss, and food-vs-fuel competition. Water consumption for irrigation is very high.
Conclusion: Fermentation has genuine sustainability advantages in many contexts. However, it is not universally "better", net sustainability depends on feedstock, land use, water use, energy source for distillation, and local infrastructure. The claim is too absolute.
(a) Equations with conditions as above.
(b) Fermentation in Brazil: renewable agricultural feedstock, low energy/infrastructure, near-carbon-neutral, reduces import dependence.
(c) Hydration in Germany: ethene from refinery cracking, high purity, high throughput, no distillation needed for industrial-grade concentration.
(d) Partially correct but oversimplified. Fermentation has genuine sustainability advantages but distillation energy cost, land use, water use, and food-vs-fuel trade-offs mean it is not automatically "more sustainable" in every context.
Earn 0 more XP in the Learn phase to unlock Practice.
Practice
Apply what you've learned. Complete Activities, then answer the MC and Short Answer questions.
Arrow Notation Audit, Correct the Equations
Each equation below contains an error in the arrow notation or equation balance. Identify and correct each one.
- CH₂=CH₂ + H₂O → CH₃CH₂OH (industrial ethanol)
- CH₃Br + NaOH(aq) ⇌ CH₃OH + NaBr
- C₆H₁₂O₆ → C₂H₅OH + CO₂ (fermentation)
Conditions Matching, Which Method?
For each set of conditions below, identify which method of alcohol production is being described and write the balanced equation:
- Yeast, 35°C, sealed vessel, no oxygen
- H₃PO₄ catalyst, 300°C, 65 atm, steam
- KOH(aq), round-bottom flask, reflux condenser, heating mantle, 1-bromopropane as starting material
Question 1. A student reacts 1-chloropropane with aqueous NaOH under reflux. Which product is formed and what is the reaction type?
Question 2. In the industrial production of ethanol by alkene hydration, single-pass conversion is approximately 5%. Which combination correctly explains how high overall yield is still achieved?
Question 3. Which set of conditions correctly describes fermentation of glucose to produce ethanol?
Question 4. Which statement correctly compares the three methods of ethanol production?
Question 5. The industrial hydration of ethene is described as operating at a rate-yield compromise temperature. Which statement best explains this?
Question 6 4 marks
Write a balanced equation for the fermentation of glucose to produce ethanol. State all three conditions required for fermentation, and explain why each condition is necessary.
Question 7 5 marks
The industrial hydration of ethene is carried out at ~300°C, ~65 atm, with a H₃PO₄ catalyst. Using Le Chatelier's Principle, explain: (a) why high pressure is used rather than atmospheric pressure; (b) why 300°C is described as a compromise temperature and not the temperature that maximises ethanol yield.
Question 8 6 marks
Brazil produces most of its transport fuel ethanol by fermentation of sugar cane, while Germany produces most of its industrial ethanol by catalytic hydration of ethene. Evaluate which method is more sustainable for large-scale ethanol production, considering feedstock, energy, purity, and land use.
Show All Answers
Multiple Choice Answers
Short Answer Sample Answers
Equation: C₆H₁₂O₆ → 2C₂H₅OH + 2CO₂ [1 mark, must have coefficient 2 on both products]
Condition 1, Yeast (zymase enzyme): biological catalyst that facilitates the multi-step conversion of glucose to ethanol; without it the reaction is too slow to be useful [1 mark]
Condition 2, ~35°C: optimal temperature for enzyme activity; above ~45°C enzyme denatures and loses function; below ~15°C rate is too slow [1 mark]
Condition 3, Anaerobic (no oxygen/air excluded): in the presence of oxygen, yeast undergoes aerobic respiration (→ CO₂ + H₂O) rather than fermentation; oxygen must be excluded for ethanol to be produced [1 mark]
(a) High pressure [2–3 marks]: Equation: CH₂=CH₂ + H₂O ⇌ CH₃CH₂OH. Left side: 2 moles of gas (ethene + steam). Right side: 0 moles of gas (ethanol condenses as liquid under process conditions). Le Chatelier's Principle: increasing pressure shifts equilibrium to the side with fewer moles of gas, the right side (products). ∴ High pressure increases the equilibrium yield of ethanol.
(b) Temperature compromise [2–3 marks]: Forward reaction is exothermic. By Le Chatelier, decreasing temperature favours the exothermic direction (forward), shifting equilibrium right and increasing yield. However, lower temperature also decreases reaction rate, reducing economic throughput. 300°C is a compromise, the rate is fast enough for continuous industrial production while still giving an acceptable equilibrium yield.
Arguments for fermentation being more sustainable: Uses renewable feedstock (plant biomass, sugar cane, corn); grown using solar energy and photosynthesis. Near-carbon-neutral, CO₂ released during fermentation is largely offset by CO₂ absorbed during plant growth. Operates at 35°C, very low energy input compared to 300°C + 65 atm for hydration. No dependence on declining fossil fuel reserves. [up to 3 marks]
Arguments against fermentation being universally more sustainable: Produces only ~15% ethanol, must be distilled to reach industrial-grade concentrations; distillation is energy-intensive and erodes the sustainability advantage. Large-scale fermentation requires clearing land for biomass crops, potentially involving deforestation, habitat loss, and food-vs-fuel competition. Very high water consumption for crop irrigation. Slow batch process with high labour requirements at scale. [up to 3 marks]
Conclusion: Fermentation has genuine sustainability advantages, particularly in countries with surplus agricultural land, warm climate, and renewable energy for distillation (e.g. Brazil). However, it is not universally more sustainable. The net outcome depends on land use, water availability, energy source for distillation, and scale. [1 mark for qualified conclusion acknowledging context-dependence]
Brazil vs. Germany, Were Your Predictions Right?
Return to your predictions. Check each one:
Higher-purity ethanol: Alkene hydration (industrial, Germany) produces ~95% purity directly from the reactor. Fermentation produces only ~15%, the Brazilian ethanol requires fractional distillation to reach fuel grade. If you predicted hydration, you were right.
Higher running cost: This is context-dependent, but alkene hydration requires 300°C and 65 atm pressure, enormous energy and infrastructure costs per unit of product. Fermentation at 35°C costs far less per batch energy-wise, though distillation adds cost. If you said hydration costs more to run in terms of energy and capital infrastructure, you were broadly right.
More sustainable: Fermentation has genuine sustainability advantages, renewable feedstock, low energy, near-carbon-neutral. But it's not a simple win: distillation energy, land clearing, and water use complicate the picture. The honest answer is "it depends on context", which is exactly the kind of nuanced evaluation the HSC rewards in top-band responses.
Coming up in Lesson 11: You will see what happens when ethanol burns, comparing its enthalpy of combustion with fossil fuels and evaluating the biofuel debate using actual energy data.
Production of Alcohols, Hydration, Substitution & Fermentation
Ethanol is simultaneously the world's most consumed psychoactive substance, a major industrial solvent, a fuel additive, and a feedstock for dozens of other chemicals, and it can be made three completely different ways, each with different feedstocks, conditions, costs, and environmental footprints.
Review
Quick-fire drill, read the prompt, recall the answer, then reveal to check.
Reveal
⇌ (reversible/equilibrium arrow), because the hydration reaction is reversible; ethanol can dehydrate back to ethene + steam. The reaction reaches a dynamic equilibrium, not full completion. Using → would imply complete reaction and earn no marks.
Reveal
(1) Yeast (enzyme zymase, biological catalyst)
(2) Temperature ~35°C (enzyme optimum; denatures above ~45°C)
(3) Anaerobic conditions (no oxygen; with O₂, yeast performs aerobic respiration → CO₂ + H₂O instead of ethanol)
Reveal
CH₂=CH₂ + H₂O ⇌ CH₃CH₂OH. Left side: 2 mol gas. Right side: 0 mol gas (ethanol is liquid). By Le Chatelier, increasing pressure shifts equilibrium to the side with fewer moles of gas, the right side (products). ∴ High pressure increases the equilibrium yield of ethanol.
Reveal
Purity: Hydration produces ~95% purity ethanol directly. Fermentation produces only ~15%, must be concentrated by fractional distillation for industrial use.
Rate: Hydration is fast and continuous (industrial throughput). Fermentation is slow (days to weeks, batch process).
Feedstock: Hydration uses non-renewable ethene (fossil fuel); fermentation uses renewable plant biomass (glucose).
Reveal
The solvent of the NaOH solution determines the reaction pathway:
• Aqueous NaOH [NaOH(aq)] → nucleophilic substitution → alcohol (R–OH) + NaX
• Alcoholic NaOH [NaOH in ethanol] → elimination → alkene (R–CH=CH₂) + NaX + H₂O
This is one of the most tested condition-dependent choices in Module 7.