Skip to content
HSCScienceModule 1 pilotSources and coverage
Investigating Science · Year 11 · Lesson 3 of 12

Observations that changed investigations

How does observation instigate scientific investigation?

30–45 min suggested learning

Module 1 pilot only. This learning resource supports the 2017 syllabus and complements your school’s supervised practical program.

Think first and set your goal

Think First

Why can noticing an unusual result matter more than immediately naming an explanation?

Saved on this device

Learning Intentions

  • Trace observation, inference and follow-up in historical cases.
  • Distinguish discovery from later evidence and development.
  • Use displacement as a safe quantitative observation.

Key Terms

displacement
A change in occupied volume, including water displaced by an immersed object.
follow-up investigation
A planned collection of further evidence prompted by an earlier result.
alternative explanation
Another account consistent with some of the same evidence.

Displacement: the measurable idea behind a story

Displacement: the measurable idea behind a story

An immersed object occupies space that water previously occupied. In a graduated cylinder, the water-level rise can measure the volume of a fully submerged irregular object, provided it does not dissolve, absorb water or react and trapped air is avoided. This is the useful scientific idea associated with Archimedes and displacement.

Separate that measurable principle from the popular bath-and-crown story. The details of an ancient anecdote are not a classroom measurement. We can test volume displacement directly without treating every feature of the story as established history. Measurements need a stated meniscus rule and suitable cylinder resolution.

Book notes: Displacement: the measurable idea behind a story

An immersed object occupies space that water previously occupied. In a graduated cylinder, the water-level rise can measure the volume of a fully submerged irregular object, provided it does not dissolve, absorb water or react and trapped air is avoided. This is the useful scientific idea associated with Archimedes and displacement.

Saved on this device

Which is the direct observation in Fleming’s case?

Fleming: an observation was a starting point

Fleming: an observation was a starting point

In 1928 Alexander Fleming noticed a region where bacterial growth was inhibited around contaminating mould on a culture plate. That pattern motivated investigation of an antibacterial substance. The observation was not a clinical trial and did not immediately produce a widely usable medicine.

Later isolation, testing, production and the work of other researchers were essential to developing penicillin. A useful historical account follows the chain from observation to an inference and then to additional evidence. This is a source-analysis case only: do not culture unknown microorganisms or grow mould in this activity.

Book notes: Fleming: an observation was a starting point

In 1928 Alexander Fleming noticed a region where bacterial growth was inhibited around contaminating mould on a culture plate. That pattern motivated investigation of an antibacterial substance. The observation was not a clinical trial and did not immediately produce a widely usable medicine.

Saved on this device

Why were repeated observations of Jupiter useful?

Galileo: repeated positions changed an interpretation

Galileo: repeated positions changed an interpretation

In January 1610 Galileo used a telescope to observe small points of light near Jupiter. Their changing positions over repeated nights supported the interpretation that they were moons orbiting Jupiter, rather than unrelated fixed background stars. The telescope expanded what could be observed; repeated records helped discriminate between explanations.

The observation did not mean that one glance established every feature of the Solar System. It challenged the idea that all celestial objects circle Earth and generated further questions. Record which part of a historical account is an observation, which is an interpretation and which required later work.

Book notes: Galileo: repeated positions changed an interpretation

In January 1610 Galileo used a telescope to observe small points of light near Jupiter. Their changing positions over repeated nights supported the interpretation that they were moons orbiting Jupiter, rather than unrelated fixed background stars. The telescope expanded what could be observed; repeated records helped discriminate between explanations.

Saved on this device

Water rises from 22.0 to 29.0 mL when an object is submerged. What is the displacement?

Worked example

Worked example: A safe, non-absorbent object is submerged. The cylinder reads 31.0 mL before and 38.5 mL after. What is supported?

  1. Subtract the initial reading from the final reading.
  2. Volume displaced = 38.5 − 31.0 = 7.5 mL.
  3. For a fully submerged non-absorbent object without trapped air, this is an estimate of its volume: 7.5 cm³.
  4. Volume alone does not establish the object’s material; mass is also needed for density.

A 7.5 cm³ volume estimate is supported under the stated conditions. Identity or historical authenticity is not established.

Activities

Activities

Activity 1

For Fleming’s case, write one observation, one inference and one follow-up question.

Saved on this device

Activity 2

Explain why repeated telescope observations are stronger than one drawing of points near Jupiter.

Saved on this device

Explore virtual investigations · Use the Working Scientifically toolkit

Independent practice

Five questions from this lesson’s eight-question bank

Answer the five-question Quick Check. Use the feedback to repair an idea before retrying.

Short answer

Explain and evaluate

Q1. Use Galileo’s case to explain how observations can generate further investigation.

Saved on this device
Explain and evaluate

Q2. Calculate volume for readings 44.0 and 52.5 mL, and identify one limitation.

Saved on this device
Explain and evaluate

Q3. Why is “Fleming saw mould, so penicillin was immediately a proven medicine” an inadequate account?

Saved on this device
Answers and model responses

Activities

Activity 1

Observation: reduced bacterial growth around mould. Inference: the mould produced something inhibiting growth. Question: does a prepared mould extract inhibit growth compared with a suitable control? This is source analysis, not a student culture instruction.

Activity 2

Repeated changes in position relative to Jupiter can distinguish an orbital interpretation from fixed background objects. Dates and consistent reference points make the comparison possible.

Short Answer Model Answers

Q1: A telescope revealed nearby points of light; repeated changes prompted an orbital explanation. Further dated observations could test that explanation against fixed stars and investigate the orbit pattern.

Q2: Volume = 8.5 mL = 8.5 cm³. Accept trapped air, incomplete submersion, absorption or limited cylinder resolution with its effect explained.

Q3: The observed inhibition prompted an antibacterial hypothesis. Isolation, testing, dosage/safety evidence and production were later steps involving other researchers. The initial observation alone did not establish clinical use.